The role of simulation in neurosurgical education

A survey of 99 United States neurosurgery program directors

Aruna Ganju, Salah G. Aoun, Marc R. Daou, Tarek Y. El Ahmadieh, Alice Chang, Lucy Wang, H. Hunt Batjer, Bernard Bendok

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: With the reduction of resident work hours and the increasing focus on patient safety, it has become evident that simulation has a growing role to play in surgical education. We surveyed the program directors of 99 U.S. Neurosurgery programs in an effort to better understand how simulation can be implemented in Neurosurgery and to gain insight into key issues that are currently being discussed amongst Neurosurgical educators. Methods: A 14-item questionnaire was emailed to 99 Neurosurgery residency program directors. Questions assessed the clinical impact of simulation, the role of simulation in academia, the investments required in time and money, and the model best suited for simulation. Results: The survey response rate was 53.5%. Seventy-two percent of respondents believed that simulation would improve patient outcome, 74% that it could supplement conventional training, but only 25% that it could replace it. The majority strongly believed that it could help preparing complex cases and could be of use to attending faculty. Forty-five percent thought that residents should achieve pre-defined levels of proficiency on simulators before working on patients. Seventy-four percent of respondents declared they would make simulator practice mandatory if available, and the majority was willing to invest daily time and considerable funds on simulators. Cadavers were the least preferred models to use compared to virtual simulation and noncadaveric physical models. Conclusions: Simulation should be integrated in Neurosurgery training curricula. The validation of available tools is the next step that will enable the training, acquisition, and testing of neurosurgical skills.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalWorld Neurosurgery
Volume80
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neurosurgery
Education
Financial Management
Patient Safety
Internship and Residency
Cadaver
Curriculum
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Academic training
  • Curriculum
  • Neurosurgical simulation
  • Program directors
  • Resident education
  • Work-hour

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

The role of simulation in neurosurgical education : A survey of 99 United States neurosurgery program directors. / Ganju, Aruna; Aoun, Salah G.; Daou, Marc R.; El Ahmadieh, Tarek Y.; Chang, Alice; Wang, Lucy; Batjer, H. Hunt; Bendok, Bernard.

In: World Neurosurgery, Vol. 80, No. 5, 11.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ganju, Aruna ; Aoun, Salah G. ; Daou, Marc R. ; El Ahmadieh, Tarek Y. ; Chang, Alice ; Wang, Lucy ; Batjer, H. Hunt ; Bendok, Bernard. / The role of simulation in neurosurgical education : A survey of 99 United States neurosurgery program directors. In: World Neurosurgery. 2013 ; Vol. 80, No. 5.
@article{7dffcaaa8cc24a208b84c31bcef3d2d2,
title = "The role of simulation in neurosurgical education: A survey of 99 United States neurosurgery program directors",
abstract = "Objective: With the reduction of resident work hours and the increasing focus on patient safety, it has become evident that simulation has a growing role to play in surgical education. We surveyed the program directors of 99 U.S. Neurosurgery programs in an effort to better understand how simulation can be implemented in Neurosurgery and to gain insight into key issues that are currently being discussed amongst Neurosurgical educators. Methods: A 14-item questionnaire was emailed to 99 Neurosurgery residency program directors. Questions assessed the clinical impact of simulation, the role of simulation in academia, the investments required in time and money, and the model best suited for simulation. Results: The survey response rate was 53.5{\%}. Seventy-two percent of respondents believed that simulation would improve patient outcome, 74{\%} that it could supplement conventional training, but only 25{\%} that it could replace it. The majority strongly believed that it could help preparing complex cases and could be of use to attending faculty. Forty-five percent thought that residents should achieve pre-defined levels of proficiency on simulators before working on patients. Seventy-four percent of respondents declared they would make simulator practice mandatory if available, and the majority was willing to invest daily time and considerable funds on simulators. Cadavers were the least preferred models to use compared to virtual simulation and noncadaveric physical models. Conclusions: Simulation should be integrated in Neurosurgery training curricula. The validation of available tools is the next step that will enable the training, acquisition, and testing of neurosurgical skills.",
keywords = "Academic training, Curriculum, Neurosurgical simulation, Program directors, Resident education, Work-hour",
author = "Aruna Ganju and Aoun, {Salah G.} and Daou, {Marc R.} and {El Ahmadieh}, {Tarek Y.} and Alice Chang and Lucy Wang and Batjer, {H. Hunt} and Bernard Bendok",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.wneu.2012.11.066",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
journal = "World Neurosurgery",
issn = "1878-8750",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of simulation in neurosurgical education

T2 - A survey of 99 United States neurosurgery program directors

AU - Ganju, Aruna

AU - Aoun, Salah G.

AU - Daou, Marc R.

AU - El Ahmadieh, Tarek Y.

AU - Chang, Alice

AU - Wang, Lucy

AU - Batjer, H. Hunt

AU - Bendok, Bernard

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Objective: With the reduction of resident work hours and the increasing focus on patient safety, it has become evident that simulation has a growing role to play in surgical education. We surveyed the program directors of 99 U.S. Neurosurgery programs in an effort to better understand how simulation can be implemented in Neurosurgery and to gain insight into key issues that are currently being discussed amongst Neurosurgical educators. Methods: A 14-item questionnaire was emailed to 99 Neurosurgery residency program directors. Questions assessed the clinical impact of simulation, the role of simulation in academia, the investments required in time and money, and the model best suited for simulation. Results: The survey response rate was 53.5%. Seventy-two percent of respondents believed that simulation would improve patient outcome, 74% that it could supplement conventional training, but only 25% that it could replace it. The majority strongly believed that it could help preparing complex cases and could be of use to attending faculty. Forty-five percent thought that residents should achieve pre-defined levels of proficiency on simulators before working on patients. Seventy-four percent of respondents declared they would make simulator practice mandatory if available, and the majority was willing to invest daily time and considerable funds on simulators. Cadavers were the least preferred models to use compared to virtual simulation and noncadaveric physical models. Conclusions: Simulation should be integrated in Neurosurgery training curricula. The validation of available tools is the next step that will enable the training, acquisition, and testing of neurosurgical skills.

AB - Objective: With the reduction of resident work hours and the increasing focus on patient safety, it has become evident that simulation has a growing role to play in surgical education. We surveyed the program directors of 99 U.S. Neurosurgery programs in an effort to better understand how simulation can be implemented in Neurosurgery and to gain insight into key issues that are currently being discussed amongst Neurosurgical educators. Methods: A 14-item questionnaire was emailed to 99 Neurosurgery residency program directors. Questions assessed the clinical impact of simulation, the role of simulation in academia, the investments required in time and money, and the model best suited for simulation. Results: The survey response rate was 53.5%. Seventy-two percent of respondents believed that simulation would improve patient outcome, 74% that it could supplement conventional training, but only 25% that it could replace it. The majority strongly believed that it could help preparing complex cases and could be of use to attending faculty. Forty-five percent thought that residents should achieve pre-defined levels of proficiency on simulators before working on patients. Seventy-four percent of respondents declared they would make simulator practice mandatory if available, and the majority was willing to invest daily time and considerable funds on simulators. Cadavers were the least preferred models to use compared to virtual simulation and noncadaveric physical models. Conclusions: Simulation should be integrated in Neurosurgery training curricula. The validation of available tools is the next step that will enable the training, acquisition, and testing of neurosurgical skills.

KW - Academic training

KW - Curriculum

KW - Neurosurgical simulation

KW - Program directors

KW - Resident education

KW - Work-hour

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888646013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888646013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.11.066

DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.11.066

M3 - Article

VL - 80

JO - World Neurosurgery

JF - World Neurosurgery

SN - 1878-8750

IS - 5

ER -