The role of intensive therapy and autologous blood and marrow transplantation for chemotherapy-sensitive relapsed and primary refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Identification of major prognostic groups

H. Miles Prince, Kevin Imrie, Crump Michael, Alexander Keith Stewart, Carounk Girouard, Richard Colwill, Joseph Brandwein, Richard W. Tsang, J. Gerald Scott, David M C Sutton, Dominic Pantalony, Kelvin Carstairs, Simon B. Sutcliffe, Armand Keating

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Scopus citations

Abstract

Patients with intermediate grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) who relapse or fail to achieve a complete remission after anthracycline-containing induction regimens have a poor outcome with conventional-dose salvage treatment. This outcome may be improved with intensive therapy and autologous transplantation (ABMT) but even in patients with proven chemotherapy-sensitive disease, relapse rates of up to 60% are observed. Reliable and powerful prognostic indicators are needed to identify appropriate patients for this expensive procedure and those subjects to whom alternative or additional treatment should be offered. We were interested in testing the hypothesis that tumour burden, and hence remission status immediately prior to transplant, is an important prognostic indicator of survival. We aggressively treated patients with conventional-dose salvage chemotherapy to maximum tumour response, and tested, by multivariate regression analysis, predictors of outcome post-transplant. We studied 81 consecutive patients with intermediate grade and immunoblastic NHL who achieved either a partial (PR) or complete remission (CR) following repetitive cycles of conventional-dose salvage therapy. Intensive therapy consisted of etoposide (60 mg/kg) and intravenous melphalan (160-180 mg/m2) with or without total body irradiation (TBI) followed by infusion of autologous unpurged bone marrow and/or blood cells. The predicted 4-year survival and progression-free survival (PFS) with a median follow-up of 37 months was 58% and 48% (95% confidence interval (CI) 37-55%), respectively. The only factor predictive of outcome was remission status at transplant (P = 0-0001). The PFS at 4 years for the CR group was 61% (95% CI 53-75%). In contrast, only 25% (95% CI 11-40%) of patients undergoing autotransplant in PR were progression free at 4 years. We conclude that remission status at transplant after maximum tumour reduction is a powerful prognostic indicator.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)880-889
Number of pages10
JournalBritish Journal of Haematology
Volume92
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Autotransplant
  • Etoposide
  • Lymphoma
  • Melphalan
  • Prognostic factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology

Cite this

Prince, H. M., Imrie, K., Michael, C., Stewart, A. K., Girouard, C., Colwill, R., Brandwein, J., Tsang, R. W., Scott, J. G., Sutton, D. M. C., Pantalony, D., Carstairs, K., Sutcliffe, S. B., & Keating, A. (1996). The role of intensive therapy and autologous blood and marrow transplantation for chemotherapy-sensitive relapsed and primary refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Identification of major prognostic groups. British Journal of Haematology, 92(4), 880-889.