The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of chronic mesenteric ischaemia

Cristina Almansa, Helga Bertani, Kyung W. Noh, Michael B. Wallace, Timothy A. Woodward, Massimo Raimondo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Doppler transabdominal ultrasound is a validated screening test for chronic mesenteric ischaemia, but gas and obesity are limitations. Endoscopic ultrasound has been proposed as a comprehensive test to evaluate chronic upper abdominal pain and is capable of Doppler measurement. We aim to evaluate the accuracy of Doppler endoscopic ultrasound (D-EUS) as a single screening test to rule out chronic mesenteric ischaemia in patients with abdominal pain and compare it with Doppler transabdominal ultrasound (D-TUS). Methods: We enrolled all patients ≥50 years with chronic upper abdominal pain and vascular risk referred for endoscopic ultrasound. All were scheduled for D-EUS and D-TUS plus a confirmatory test if one of the previous resulted positive. We estimated the accuracy of both techniques comparing them using McNemar test. Results: 68 patients completed the study. Fifty-three (78%) underwent D-EUS, D-TUS, and a confirmatory test. Fifteen (38%) underwent follow-up after negative results. Three (4%) in the D-EUS group and 14 in the D-TUS (21%) were excluded due to artefacts. D-EUS presented a sensitivity of 63%, specificity of 84%, whilst D-TUS presented a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 78%. Specificity of D-EUS was not significantly different to D-TUS. Conclusions: These results support the role of Doppler endoscopic ultrasound to exclude chronic mesenteric ischaemia as cause of chronic abdominal pain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)470-474
Number of pages5
JournalDigestive and Liver Disease
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Doppler Ultrasonography
Abdominal Pain
Mesenteric Ischemia
Chronic Pain
Artifacts

Keywords

  • Chronic abdominal pain
  • Chronic mesenteric ischaemia
  • Doppler
  • Endoscopic ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Hepatology

Cite this

The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of chronic mesenteric ischaemia. / Almansa, Cristina; Bertani, Helga; Noh, Kyung W.; Wallace, Michael B.; Woodward, Timothy A.; Raimondo, Massimo.

In: Digestive and Liver Disease, Vol. 43, No. 6, 06.2011, p. 470-474.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Almansa, Cristina ; Bertani, Helga ; Noh, Kyung W. ; Wallace, Michael B. ; Woodward, Timothy A. ; Raimondo, Massimo. / The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of chronic mesenteric ischaemia. In: Digestive and Liver Disease. 2011 ; Vol. 43, No. 6. pp. 470-474.
@article{63af033057ee474c8dc7bc1eea02a1a9,
title = "The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of chronic mesenteric ischaemia",
abstract = "Introduction: Doppler transabdominal ultrasound is a validated screening test for chronic mesenteric ischaemia, but gas and obesity are limitations. Endoscopic ultrasound has been proposed as a comprehensive test to evaluate chronic upper abdominal pain and is capable of Doppler measurement. We aim to evaluate the accuracy of Doppler endoscopic ultrasound (D-EUS) as a single screening test to rule out chronic mesenteric ischaemia in patients with abdominal pain and compare it with Doppler transabdominal ultrasound (D-TUS). Methods: We enrolled all patients ≥50 years with chronic upper abdominal pain and vascular risk referred for endoscopic ultrasound. All were scheduled for D-EUS and D-TUS plus a confirmatory test if one of the previous resulted positive. We estimated the accuracy of both techniques comparing them using McNemar test. Results: 68 patients completed the study. Fifty-three (78{\%}) underwent D-EUS, D-TUS, and a confirmatory test. Fifteen (38{\%}) underwent follow-up after negative results. Three (4{\%}) in the D-EUS group and 14 in the D-TUS (21{\%}) were excluded due to artefacts. D-EUS presented a sensitivity of 63{\%}, specificity of 84{\%}, whilst D-TUS presented a sensitivity of 80{\%} and a specificity of 78{\%}. Specificity of D-EUS was not significantly different to D-TUS. Conclusions: These results support the role of Doppler endoscopic ultrasound to exclude chronic mesenteric ischaemia as cause of chronic abdominal pain.",
keywords = "Chronic abdominal pain, Chronic mesenteric ischaemia, Doppler, Endoscopic ultrasound",
author = "Cristina Almansa and Helga Bertani and Noh, {Kyung W.} and Wallace, {Michael B.} and Woodward, {Timothy A.} and Massimo Raimondo",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.dld.2011.01.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "470--474",
journal = "Digestive and Liver Disease",
issn = "1590-8658",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of chronic mesenteric ischaemia

AU - Almansa, Cristina

AU - Bertani, Helga

AU - Noh, Kyung W.

AU - Wallace, Michael B.

AU - Woodward, Timothy A.

AU - Raimondo, Massimo

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Introduction: Doppler transabdominal ultrasound is a validated screening test for chronic mesenteric ischaemia, but gas and obesity are limitations. Endoscopic ultrasound has been proposed as a comprehensive test to evaluate chronic upper abdominal pain and is capable of Doppler measurement. We aim to evaluate the accuracy of Doppler endoscopic ultrasound (D-EUS) as a single screening test to rule out chronic mesenteric ischaemia in patients with abdominal pain and compare it with Doppler transabdominal ultrasound (D-TUS). Methods: We enrolled all patients ≥50 years with chronic upper abdominal pain and vascular risk referred for endoscopic ultrasound. All were scheduled for D-EUS and D-TUS plus a confirmatory test if one of the previous resulted positive. We estimated the accuracy of both techniques comparing them using McNemar test. Results: 68 patients completed the study. Fifty-three (78%) underwent D-EUS, D-TUS, and a confirmatory test. Fifteen (38%) underwent follow-up after negative results. Three (4%) in the D-EUS group and 14 in the D-TUS (21%) were excluded due to artefacts. D-EUS presented a sensitivity of 63%, specificity of 84%, whilst D-TUS presented a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 78%. Specificity of D-EUS was not significantly different to D-TUS. Conclusions: These results support the role of Doppler endoscopic ultrasound to exclude chronic mesenteric ischaemia as cause of chronic abdominal pain.

AB - Introduction: Doppler transabdominal ultrasound is a validated screening test for chronic mesenteric ischaemia, but gas and obesity are limitations. Endoscopic ultrasound has been proposed as a comprehensive test to evaluate chronic upper abdominal pain and is capable of Doppler measurement. We aim to evaluate the accuracy of Doppler endoscopic ultrasound (D-EUS) as a single screening test to rule out chronic mesenteric ischaemia in patients with abdominal pain and compare it with Doppler transabdominal ultrasound (D-TUS). Methods: We enrolled all patients ≥50 years with chronic upper abdominal pain and vascular risk referred for endoscopic ultrasound. All were scheduled for D-EUS and D-TUS plus a confirmatory test if one of the previous resulted positive. We estimated the accuracy of both techniques comparing them using McNemar test. Results: 68 patients completed the study. Fifty-three (78%) underwent D-EUS, D-TUS, and a confirmatory test. Fifteen (38%) underwent follow-up after negative results. Three (4%) in the D-EUS group and 14 in the D-TUS (21%) were excluded due to artefacts. D-EUS presented a sensitivity of 63%, specificity of 84%, whilst D-TUS presented a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 78%. Specificity of D-EUS was not significantly different to D-TUS. Conclusions: These results support the role of Doppler endoscopic ultrasound to exclude chronic mesenteric ischaemia as cause of chronic abdominal pain.

KW - Chronic abdominal pain

KW - Chronic mesenteric ischaemia

KW - Doppler

KW - Endoscopic ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955927444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955927444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dld.2011.01.003

DO - 10.1016/j.dld.2011.01.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 21316317

AN - SCOPUS:79955927444

VL - 43

SP - 470

EP - 474

JO - Digestive and Liver Disease

JF - Digestive and Liver Disease

SN - 1590-8658

IS - 6

ER -