The risk of post ERCP pancreatitis with and without sphincterotomy in patients undergoing biliary stent placement

M. A. Shafi, R. M. Bashir, F. H. Al-Kawas, D. F. Fleischer, S. B. Benjamin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background:Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (ES) prior to the placement of biliary stent is frequently performed,however, data evaluating the utility and complications of this approach are limited.Our aim was to compare post ERCP complications in patients who underwent biliary stent insertion with and without ES. Methods:All patients undergoing stent placement from 1989 to 1995 were evaluated.Data collected included patient demographics,procedural indication,stent size,antecedent endoscopic therapy and ES and stent related complications. Patients with prior biliary sphinterotomy and with pancreatic stems were excluded. Results:Among the 148 patients (76 M, 72 F) who underwent stent placement over a 6 year period 61 patients underwent ES at the time of stent placement, 87 patients had stent placed without sphincterotomy. The groups were matched for age, sex, procedural indication and stent size. Eight patients (5.4%) had complications requiring hospitalization. There was no procedure related perforation or death. Stent w/ES, Stent only P value Total patients Complications n=61 n=87 Bleeding 3(4.9%) - ns Pancreatitis - 2(2.3%) ns Abdominal pain 1(1.6%) 2(2.3%) ns Total 4 4 ns Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of complications in patients undergoing biliary stent placement with or without sphincterotomy ES at the time of stent placement does not decrease the risk ofpost ERCP pancreatitis and is not necessary for routine biliary stent placement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)395
Number of pages1
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume43
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Pancreatitis
Stents
Endoscopic Sphincterotomy
Abdominal Pain
Hospitalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Shafi, M. A., Bashir, R. M., Al-Kawas, F. H., Fleischer, D. F., & Benjamin, S. B. (1996). The risk of post ERCP pancreatitis with and without sphincterotomy in patients undergoing biliary stent placement. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 43(4), 395.

The risk of post ERCP pancreatitis with and without sphincterotomy in patients undergoing biliary stent placement. / Shafi, M. A.; Bashir, R. M.; Al-Kawas, F. H.; Fleischer, D. F.; Benjamin, S. B.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 43, No. 4, 1996, p. 395.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shafi, MA, Bashir, RM, Al-Kawas, FH, Fleischer, DF & Benjamin, SB 1996, 'The risk of post ERCP pancreatitis with and without sphincterotomy in patients undergoing biliary stent placement', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 395.
Shafi, M. A. ; Bashir, R. M. ; Al-Kawas, F. H. ; Fleischer, D. F. ; Benjamin, S. B. / The risk of post ERCP pancreatitis with and without sphincterotomy in patients undergoing biliary stent placement. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1996 ; Vol. 43, No. 4. pp. 395.
@article{c7ff0fabba2b4027b6f75c03e765a7a8,
title = "The risk of post ERCP pancreatitis with and without sphincterotomy in patients undergoing biliary stent placement",
abstract = "Background:Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (ES) prior to the placement of biliary stent is frequently performed,however, data evaluating the utility and complications of this approach are limited.Our aim was to compare post ERCP complications in patients who underwent biliary stent insertion with and without ES. Methods:All patients undergoing stent placement from 1989 to 1995 were evaluated.Data collected included patient demographics,procedural indication,stent size,antecedent endoscopic therapy and ES and stent related complications. Patients with prior biliary sphinterotomy and with pancreatic stems were excluded. Results:Among the 148 patients (76 M, 72 F) who underwent stent placement over a 6 year period 61 patients underwent ES at the time of stent placement, 87 patients had stent placed without sphincterotomy. The groups were matched for age, sex, procedural indication and stent size. Eight patients (5.4{\%}) had complications requiring hospitalization. There was no procedure related perforation or death. Stent w/ES, Stent only P value Total patients Complications n=61 n=87 Bleeding 3(4.9{\%}) - ns Pancreatitis - 2(2.3{\%}) ns Abdominal pain 1(1.6{\%}) 2(2.3{\%}) ns Total 4 4 ns Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of complications in patients undergoing biliary stent placement with or without sphincterotomy ES at the time of stent placement does not decrease the risk ofpost ERCP pancreatitis and is not necessary for routine biliary stent placement.",
author = "Shafi, {M. A.} and Bashir, {R. M.} and Al-Kawas, {F. H.} and Fleischer, {D. F.} and Benjamin, {S. B.}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "395",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The risk of post ERCP pancreatitis with and without sphincterotomy in patients undergoing biliary stent placement

AU - Shafi, M. A.

AU - Bashir, R. M.

AU - Al-Kawas, F. H.

AU - Fleischer, D. F.

AU - Benjamin, S. B.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Background:Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (ES) prior to the placement of biliary stent is frequently performed,however, data evaluating the utility and complications of this approach are limited.Our aim was to compare post ERCP complications in patients who underwent biliary stent insertion with and without ES. Methods:All patients undergoing stent placement from 1989 to 1995 were evaluated.Data collected included patient demographics,procedural indication,stent size,antecedent endoscopic therapy and ES and stent related complications. Patients with prior biliary sphinterotomy and with pancreatic stems were excluded. Results:Among the 148 patients (76 M, 72 F) who underwent stent placement over a 6 year period 61 patients underwent ES at the time of stent placement, 87 patients had stent placed without sphincterotomy. The groups were matched for age, sex, procedural indication and stent size. Eight patients (5.4%) had complications requiring hospitalization. There was no procedure related perforation or death. Stent w/ES, Stent only P value Total patients Complications n=61 n=87 Bleeding 3(4.9%) - ns Pancreatitis - 2(2.3%) ns Abdominal pain 1(1.6%) 2(2.3%) ns Total 4 4 ns Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of complications in patients undergoing biliary stent placement with or without sphincterotomy ES at the time of stent placement does not decrease the risk ofpost ERCP pancreatitis and is not necessary for routine biliary stent placement.

AB - Background:Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (ES) prior to the placement of biliary stent is frequently performed,however, data evaluating the utility and complications of this approach are limited.Our aim was to compare post ERCP complications in patients who underwent biliary stent insertion with and without ES. Methods:All patients undergoing stent placement from 1989 to 1995 were evaluated.Data collected included patient demographics,procedural indication,stent size,antecedent endoscopic therapy and ES and stent related complications. Patients with prior biliary sphinterotomy and with pancreatic stems were excluded. Results:Among the 148 patients (76 M, 72 F) who underwent stent placement over a 6 year period 61 patients underwent ES at the time of stent placement, 87 patients had stent placed without sphincterotomy. The groups were matched for age, sex, procedural indication and stent size. Eight patients (5.4%) had complications requiring hospitalization. There was no procedure related perforation or death. Stent w/ES, Stent only P value Total patients Complications n=61 n=87 Bleeding 3(4.9%) - ns Pancreatitis - 2(2.3%) ns Abdominal pain 1(1.6%) 2(2.3%) ns Total 4 4 ns Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of complications in patients undergoing biliary stent placement with or without sphincterotomy ES at the time of stent placement does not decrease the risk ofpost ERCP pancreatitis and is not necessary for routine biliary stent placement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748985480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748985480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33748985480

VL - 43

SP - 395

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 4

ER -