The relative efficiency of time-to-threshold and rate of change in longitudinal data

M. C. Donohue, A. C. Gamst, R. G. Thomas, R. Xu, L. Beckett, Ronald Carl Petersen, M. W. Weiner, P. Aisen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Randomized, placebo-controlled trials often use time-to-event as the primary endpoint, even when a continuous measure of disease severity is available. We compare the power to detect a treatment effect using either rate of change, as estimated by linear models of longitudinal continuous data, or time-to-event estimated by Cox proportional hazards models. We propose an analytic inflation factor for comparing the two types of analyses assuming that the time-to-event can be expressed as a time-to-threshold of the continuous measure. We conduct simulations based on a publicly available Alzheimer's disease data set in which the time-to-event is algorithmically defined based on a battery of assessments. A Cox proportional hazards model of the time-to-event endpoint is compared to a linear model of a single assessment from the battery. The simulations also explore the impact of baseline covariates in either analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)685-693
Number of pages9
JournalContemporary Clinical Trials
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2011

Fingerprint

Proportional Hazards Models
Linear Models
Economic Inflation
Alzheimer Disease
Randomized Controlled Trials
Placebos
Therapeutics
Power (Psychology)
Datasets

Keywords

  • Linear mixed models
  • Longitudinal data
  • Marginal linear models
  • Power
  • Survival analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The relative efficiency of time-to-threshold and rate of change in longitudinal data. / Donohue, M. C.; Gamst, A. C.; Thomas, R. G.; Xu, R.; Beckett, L.; Petersen, Ronald Carl; Weiner, M. W.; Aisen, P.

In: Contemporary Clinical Trials, Vol. 32, No. 5, 09.2011, p. 685-693.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Donohue, MC, Gamst, AC, Thomas, RG, Xu, R, Beckett, L, Petersen, RC, Weiner, MW & Aisen, P 2011, 'The relative efficiency of time-to-threshold and rate of change in longitudinal data', Contemporary Clinical Trials, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 685-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2011.04.007
Donohue, M. C. ; Gamst, A. C. ; Thomas, R. G. ; Xu, R. ; Beckett, L. ; Petersen, Ronald Carl ; Weiner, M. W. ; Aisen, P. / The relative efficiency of time-to-threshold and rate of change in longitudinal data. In: Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2011 ; Vol. 32, No. 5. pp. 685-693.
@article{56e4a08960d145a3b65c779c499b1956,
title = "The relative efficiency of time-to-threshold and rate of change in longitudinal data",
abstract = "Randomized, placebo-controlled trials often use time-to-event as the primary endpoint, even when a continuous measure of disease severity is available. We compare the power to detect a treatment effect using either rate of change, as estimated by linear models of longitudinal continuous data, or time-to-event estimated by Cox proportional hazards models. We propose an analytic inflation factor for comparing the two types of analyses assuming that the time-to-event can be expressed as a time-to-threshold of the continuous measure. We conduct simulations based on a publicly available Alzheimer's disease data set in which the time-to-event is algorithmically defined based on a battery of assessments. A Cox proportional hazards model of the time-to-event endpoint is compared to a linear model of a single assessment from the battery. The simulations also explore the impact of baseline covariates in either analysis.",
keywords = "Linear mixed models, Longitudinal data, Marginal linear models, Power, Survival analysis",
author = "Donohue, {M. C.} and Gamst, {A. C.} and Thomas, {R. G.} and R. Xu and L. Beckett and Petersen, {Ronald Carl} and Weiner, {M. W.} and P. Aisen",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.cct.2011.04.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "685--693",
journal = "Contemporary Clinical Trials",
issn = "1551-7144",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relative efficiency of time-to-threshold and rate of change in longitudinal data

AU - Donohue, M. C.

AU - Gamst, A. C.

AU - Thomas, R. G.

AU - Xu, R.

AU - Beckett, L.

AU - Petersen, Ronald Carl

AU - Weiner, M. W.

AU - Aisen, P.

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - Randomized, placebo-controlled trials often use time-to-event as the primary endpoint, even when a continuous measure of disease severity is available. We compare the power to detect a treatment effect using either rate of change, as estimated by linear models of longitudinal continuous data, or time-to-event estimated by Cox proportional hazards models. We propose an analytic inflation factor for comparing the two types of analyses assuming that the time-to-event can be expressed as a time-to-threshold of the continuous measure. We conduct simulations based on a publicly available Alzheimer's disease data set in which the time-to-event is algorithmically defined based on a battery of assessments. A Cox proportional hazards model of the time-to-event endpoint is compared to a linear model of a single assessment from the battery. The simulations also explore the impact of baseline covariates in either analysis.

AB - Randomized, placebo-controlled trials often use time-to-event as the primary endpoint, even when a continuous measure of disease severity is available. We compare the power to detect a treatment effect using either rate of change, as estimated by linear models of longitudinal continuous data, or time-to-event estimated by Cox proportional hazards models. We propose an analytic inflation factor for comparing the two types of analyses assuming that the time-to-event can be expressed as a time-to-threshold of the continuous measure. We conduct simulations based on a publicly available Alzheimer's disease data set in which the time-to-event is algorithmically defined based on a battery of assessments. A Cox proportional hazards model of the time-to-event endpoint is compared to a linear model of a single assessment from the battery. The simulations also explore the impact of baseline covariates in either analysis.

KW - Linear mixed models

KW - Longitudinal data

KW - Marginal linear models

KW - Power

KW - Survival analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960894260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960894260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cct.2011.04.007

DO - 10.1016/j.cct.2011.04.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 21554992

AN - SCOPUS:79960894260

VL - 32

SP - 685

EP - 693

JO - Contemporary Clinical Trials

JF - Contemporary Clinical Trials

SN - 1551-7144

IS - 5

ER -