The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: A systematic review

Dean Fergusson, Zarah Monfaredi, Kusala Pussegoda, Chantelle Garritty, Anne Lyddiatt, Beverley Shea, Lisa Duffett, Mona Ghannad, Joshua Montroy, Mohammad H Murad, Misty Pratt, Tamara Rader, Risa Shorr, Fatemeh Yazdi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Patient-Oriented Research (POR) is research informed by patients and is centred on what is of importance to them. A fundamental component of POR is that patients are included as an integral part of the research process from conception to dissemination and implementation, and by extension, across the research continuum from basic research to pragmatic trials [J Comp Eff Res 2012, 1:181–94, JAMA 2012, 307:1587–8]. Since POR’s inception, questions have been raised as to how best to achieve this goal. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative trials that report engaging patients in their research. Our main goal was to describe the characteristics of published trials engaging patients in research, and to identify the extent of patient engagement activities reported in these trials. Methods: The MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, Cinahl, PsycINFO, Cochrane Methodology Registry, and Pubmed were searched from May 2011 to June 16th, 2016. Title, abstract and full text screening of all reports were conducted independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted from included trials by one reviewer and verified by a second. All trials that report patient engagement for the purposes of research were included.Results: Of the 9490 citations retrieved, 2777 were reviewed at full text, of which 23 trials were included. Out of the 23 trials, 17 were randomized control trials, and six were non-randomized comparative trials. The majority of these trials (83%, 19/23) originated in the United States and United Kingdom. The trials engaged a range of 2-24 patients/ community representatives per study. Engagement of children and minorities occurred in 13% (3/23) and 26% (6/23) of trials; respectively. Engagement was identified in the development of the research question, the selection of study outcomes, and the dissemination and implementation of results. Conclusions: The prevalence of patient engagement in patient-oriented interventional research is very poor with 23 trials reporting activities engaging patients. Research dedicated to determining the best practice for meaningful engagement is still needed, but adequate reporting measures also need to be defined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number17
JournalResearch Involvement and Engagement
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 22 2018

Fingerprint

Patient Participation
Research
Pragmatic Clinical Trials
Patient Advocacy
Practice Guidelines
PubMed
MEDLINE
basic research
Registries
research process

Keywords

  • Clinical trials
  • Patient engagement
  • Patient-oriented research
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Fergusson, D., Monfaredi, Z., Pussegoda, K., Garritty, C., Lyddiatt, A., Shea, B., ... Yazdi, F. (2018). The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: A systematic review. Research Involvement and Engagement, 4(1), [17]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-018-0099-x

The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials : A systematic review. / Fergusson, Dean; Monfaredi, Zarah; Pussegoda, Kusala; Garritty, Chantelle; Lyddiatt, Anne; Shea, Beverley; Duffett, Lisa; Ghannad, Mona; Montroy, Joshua; Murad, Mohammad H; Pratt, Misty; Rader, Tamara; Shorr, Risa; Yazdi, Fatemeh.

In: Research Involvement and Engagement, Vol. 4, No. 1, 17, 22.05.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fergusson, D, Monfaredi, Z, Pussegoda, K, Garritty, C, Lyddiatt, A, Shea, B, Duffett, L, Ghannad, M, Montroy, J, Murad, MH, Pratt, M, Rader, T, Shorr, R & Yazdi, F 2018, 'The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: A systematic review', Research Involvement and Engagement, vol. 4, no. 1, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-018-0099-x
Fergusson D, Monfaredi Z, Pussegoda K, Garritty C, Lyddiatt A, Shea B et al. The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: A systematic review. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2018 May 22;4(1). 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-018-0099-x
Fergusson, Dean ; Monfaredi, Zarah ; Pussegoda, Kusala ; Garritty, Chantelle ; Lyddiatt, Anne ; Shea, Beverley ; Duffett, Lisa ; Ghannad, Mona ; Montroy, Joshua ; Murad, Mohammad H ; Pratt, Misty ; Rader, Tamara ; Shorr, Risa ; Yazdi, Fatemeh. / The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials : A systematic review. In: Research Involvement and Engagement. 2018 ; Vol. 4, No. 1.
@article{4a8dadad073442fd838641b3b1c5ec8c,
title = "The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: A systematic review",
abstract = "Background: Patient-Oriented Research (POR) is research informed by patients and is centred on what is of importance to them. A fundamental component of POR is that patients are included as an integral part of the research process from conception to dissemination and implementation, and by extension, across the research continuum from basic research to pragmatic trials [J Comp Eff Res 2012, 1:181–94, JAMA 2012, 307:1587–8]. Since POR’s inception, questions have been raised as to how best to achieve this goal. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative trials that report engaging patients in their research. Our main goal was to describe the characteristics of published trials engaging patients in research, and to identify the extent of patient engagement activities reported in these trials. Methods: The MEDLINE{\circledR}, EMBASE{\circledR}, Cinahl, PsycINFO, Cochrane Methodology Registry, and Pubmed were searched from May 2011 to June 16th, 2016. Title, abstract and full text screening of all reports were conducted independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted from included trials by one reviewer and verified by a second. All trials that report patient engagement for the purposes of research were included.Results: Of the 9490 citations retrieved, 2777 were reviewed at full text, of which 23 trials were included. Out of the 23 trials, 17 were randomized control trials, and six were non-randomized comparative trials. The majority of these trials (83{\%}, 19/23) originated in the United States and United Kingdom. The trials engaged a range of 2-24 patients/ community representatives per study. Engagement of children and minorities occurred in 13{\%} (3/23) and 26{\%} (6/23) of trials; respectively. Engagement was identified in the development of the research question, the selection of study outcomes, and the dissemination and implementation of results. Conclusions: The prevalence of patient engagement in patient-oriented interventional research is very poor with 23 trials reporting activities engaging patients. Research dedicated to determining the best practice for meaningful engagement is still needed, but adequate reporting measures also need to be defined.",
keywords = "Clinical trials, Patient engagement, Patient-oriented research, Systematic review",
author = "Dean Fergusson and Zarah Monfaredi and Kusala Pussegoda and Chantelle Garritty and Anne Lyddiatt and Beverley Shea and Lisa Duffett and Mona Ghannad and Joshua Montroy and Murad, {Mohammad H} and Misty Pratt and Tamara Rader and Risa Shorr and Fatemeh Yazdi",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1186/s40900-018-0099-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
journal = "Research Involvement and Engagement",
issn = "2056-7529",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Fergusson, Dean

AU - Monfaredi, Zarah

AU - Pussegoda, Kusala

AU - Garritty, Chantelle

AU - Lyddiatt, Anne

AU - Shea, Beverley

AU - Duffett, Lisa

AU - Ghannad, Mona

AU - Montroy, Joshua

AU - Murad, Mohammad H

AU - Pratt, Misty

AU - Rader, Tamara

AU - Shorr, Risa

AU - Yazdi, Fatemeh

PY - 2018/5/22

Y1 - 2018/5/22

N2 - Background: Patient-Oriented Research (POR) is research informed by patients and is centred on what is of importance to them. A fundamental component of POR is that patients are included as an integral part of the research process from conception to dissemination and implementation, and by extension, across the research continuum from basic research to pragmatic trials [J Comp Eff Res 2012, 1:181–94, JAMA 2012, 307:1587–8]. Since POR’s inception, questions have been raised as to how best to achieve this goal. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative trials that report engaging patients in their research. Our main goal was to describe the characteristics of published trials engaging patients in research, and to identify the extent of patient engagement activities reported in these trials. Methods: The MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, Cinahl, PsycINFO, Cochrane Methodology Registry, and Pubmed were searched from May 2011 to June 16th, 2016. Title, abstract and full text screening of all reports were conducted independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted from included trials by one reviewer and verified by a second. All trials that report patient engagement for the purposes of research were included.Results: Of the 9490 citations retrieved, 2777 were reviewed at full text, of which 23 trials were included. Out of the 23 trials, 17 were randomized control trials, and six were non-randomized comparative trials. The majority of these trials (83%, 19/23) originated in the United States and United Kingdom. The trials engaged a range of 2-24 patients/ community representatives per study. Engagement of children and minorities occurred in 13% (3/23) and 26% (6/23) of trials; respectively. Engagement was identified in the development of the research question, the selection of study outcomes, and the dissemination and implementation of results. Conclusions: The prevalence of patient engagement in patient-oriented interventional research is very poor with 23 trials reporting activities engaging patients. Research dedicated to determining the best practice for meaningful engagement is still needed, but adequate reporting measures also need to be defined.

AB - Background: Patient-Oriented Research (POR) is research informed by patients and is centred on what is of importance to them. A fundamental component of POR is that patients are included as an integral part of the research process from conception to dissemination and implementation, and by extension, across the research continuum from basic research to pragmatic trials [J Comp Eff Res 2012, 1:181–94, JAMA 2012, 307:1587–8]. Since POR’s inception, questions have been raised as to how best to achieve this goal. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative trials that report engaging patients in their research. Our main goal was to describe the characteristics of published trials engaging patients in research, and to identify the extent of patient engagement activities reported in these trials. Methods: The MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, Cinahl, PsycINFO, Cochrane Methodology Registry, and Pubmed were searched from May 2011 to June 16th, 2016. Title, abstract and full text screening of all reports were conducted independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted from included trials by one reviewer and verified by a second. All trials that report patient engagement for the purposes of research were included.Results: Of the 9490 citations retrieved, 2777 were reviewed at full text, of which 23 trials were included. Out of the 23 trials, 17 were randomized control trials, and six were non-randomized comparative trials. The majority of these trials (83%, 19/23) originated in the United States and United Kingdom. The trials engaged a range of 2-24 patients/ community representatives per study. Engagement of children and minorities occurred in 13% (3/23) and 26% (6/23) of trials; respectively. Engagement was identified in the development of the research question, the selection of study outcomes, and the dissemination and implementation of results. Conclusions: The prevalence of patient engagement in patient-oriented interventional research is very poor with 23 trials reporting activities engaging patients. Research dedicated to determining the best practice for meaningful engagement is still needed, but adequate reporting measures also need to be defined.

KW - Clinical trials

KW - Patient engagement

KW - Patient-oriented research

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062321019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062321019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s40900-018-0099-x

DO - 10.1186/s40900-018-0099-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85062321019

VL - 4

JO - Research Involvement and Engagement

JF - Research Involvement and Engagement

SN - 2056-7529

IS - 1

M1 - 17

ER -