The opinion of current and recent internal medicine residents regarding a fourth year of training and the future of general internal medicine

Stephen M. Salerno, Clayton T. Cowl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the opinion of current residents and recent graduates of internal medicine training programs regarding an additional mandatory year of residency training. METHODS: A survey was made of 2,000 associate members of the American College of Physicians from five geographic regions. RESULTS: Of 917 respondents, 70.3% thought a fourth year of training would impact negatively on their choice of a career in internal medicine, and 82.9% believed a mandatory fourth year should not be required of residents choosing a subspecialty career. Furthermore, 58.1% of physicians surveyed thought a mandatory fourth year would discourage individuals from pursuing subspecialty careers. If a mandatory fourth year of training were required, 50.7% respondents indicated that it should consist of ambulatory training in a number of general fields, while 49.6% physicians believed the training should focus on one or two subspecialty fields. CONCLUSIONS: A mandatory fourth year of training is not supported by residents and recent graduates of the programs surveyed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)143-146
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Medicine
Volume102
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Internal Medicine
Physicians
Career Choice
Internship and Residency
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

The opinion of current and recent internal medicine residents regarding a fourth year of training and the future of general internal medicine. / Salerno, Stephen M.; Cowl, Clayton T.

In: American Journal of Medicine, Vol. 102, No. 2, 02.1997, p. 143-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a039aba891094389ac1137ab3a032277,
title = "The opinion of current and recent internal medicine residents regarding a fourth year of training and the future of general internal medicine",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To determine the opinion of current residents and recent graduates of internal medicine training programs regarding an additional mandatory year of residency training. METHODS: A survey was made of 2,000 associate members of the American College of Physicians from five geographic regions. RESULTS: Of 917 respondents, 70.3{\%} thought a fourth year of training would impact negatively on their choice of a career in internal medicine, and 82.9{\%} believed a mandatory fourth year should not be required of residents choosing a subspecialty career. Furthermore, 58.1{\%} of physicians surveyed thought a mandatory fourth year would discourage individuals from pursuing subspecialty careers. If a mandatory fourth year of training were required, 50.7{\%} respondents indicated that it should consist of ambulatory training in a number of general fields, while 49.6{\%} physicians believed the training should focus on one or two subspecialty fields. CONCLUSIONS: A mandatory fourth year of training is not supported by residents and recent graduates of the programs surveyed.",
author = "Salerno, {Stephen M.} and Cowl, {Clayton T.}",
year = "1997",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00357-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "143--146",
journal = "American Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0002-9343",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The opinion of current and recent internal medicine residents regarding a fourth year of training and the future of general internal medicine

AU - Salerno, Stephen M.

AU - Cowl, Clayton T.

PY - 1997/2

Y1 - 1997/2

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine the opinion of current residents and recent graduates of internal medicine training programs regarding an additional mandatory year of residency training. METHODS: A survey was made of 2,000 associate members of the American College of Physicians from five geographic regions. RESULTS: Of 917 respondents, 70.3% thought a fourth year of training would impact negatively on their choice of a career in internal medicine, and 82.9% believed a mandatory fourth year should not be required of residents choosing a subspecialty career. Furthermore, 58.1% of physicians surveyed thought a mandatory fourth year would discourage individuals from pursuing subspecialty careers. If a mandatory fourth year of training were required, 50.7% respondents indicated that it should consist of ambulatory training in a number of general fields, while 49.6% physicians believed the training should focus on one or two subspecialty fields. CONCLUSIONS: A mandatory fourth year of training is not supported by residents and recent graduates of the programs surveyed.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To determine the opinion of current residents and recent graduates of internal medicine training programs regarding an additional mandatory year of residency training. METHODS: A survey was made of 2,000 associate members of the American College of Physicians from five geographic regions. RESULTS: Of 917 respondents, 70.3% thought a fourth year of training would impact negatively on their choice of a career in internal medicine, and 82.9% believed a mandatory fourth year should not be required of residents choosing a subspecialty career. Furthermore, 58.1% of physicians surveyed thought a mandatory fourth year would discourage individuals from pursuing subspecialty careers. If a mandatory fourth year of training were required, 50.7% respondents indicated that it should consist of ambulatory training in a number of general fields, while 49.6% physicians believed the training should focus on one or two subspecialty fields. CONCLUSIONS: A mandatory fourth year of training is not supported by residents and recent graduates of the programs surveyed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030972684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030972684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00357-9

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00357-9

M3 - Article

VL - 102

SP - 143

EP - 146

JO - American Journal of Medicine

JF - American Journal of Medicine

SN - 0002-9343

IS - 2

ER -