The Olmsted County Benchmark Project: Primary study findings and potential implications for corporate America

M. E. Campion, James M Naessens, C. L. Leibson, D. Shaller, D. J. Ballard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since 1965, expenditures for medical care in the United States have increased 10-fold. As a result, corporate outlays for health benefits have skyrocketed. Employers have instituted various cost-containment measures based in part on reports of wide variations in rates of utilization and the assumption that unnecessary or inappropriate utilization of medical care contributes to increasing costs. Frequently, however, employers lack adequate means for identifying sources of variation or for evaluating its appropriateness. In this article, we report on a project in which hospital utilization among several US corporate populations was compared with that for a geographically defined benchmark population to assist employers in the assessment of their rates of utilization and expenditures and to identify specific areas that merit further investigation. Our findings illuminate the difficulties in constructing valid rates from medical-care claims data and emphasize potential biases due to problems of comparability between populations. We also address the potential value of such comparisons for helping corporations identify areas in which cost-containment efforts may be most effective and yet not jeopardize the quality of medical care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-14
Number of pages10
JournalMayo Clinic Proceedings
Volume67
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Benchmarking
Cost Control
Health Expenditures
Population
Costs and Cost Analysis
Quality of Health Care
Insurance Benefits

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The Olmsted County Benchmark Project : Primary study findings and potential implications for corporate America. / Campion, M. E.; Naessens, James M; Leibson, C. L.; Shaller, D.; Ballard, D. J.

In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 67, No. 1, 1992, p. 5-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Campion, M. E. ; Naessens, James M ; Leibson, C. L. ; Shaller, D. ; Ballard, D. J. / The Olmsted County Benchmark Project : Primary study findings and potential implications for corporate America. In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1992 ; Vol. 67, No. 1. pp. 5-14.
@article{a6ddfa71c1784c43ac5cc7abe96c1012,
title = "The Olmsted County Benchmark Project: Primary study findings and potential implications for corporate America",
abstract = "Since 1965, expenditures for medical care in the United States have increased 10-fold. As a result, corporate outlays for health benefits have skyrocketed. Employers have instituted various cost-containment measures based in part on reports of wide variations in rates of utilization and the assumption that unnecessary or inappropriate utilization of medical care contributes to increasing costs. Frequently, however, employers lack adequate means for identifying sources of variation or for evaluating its appropriateness. In this article, we report on a project in which hospital utilization among several US corporate populations was compared with that for a geographically defined benchmark population to assist employers in the assessment of their rates of utilization and expenditures and to identify specific areas that merit further investigation. Our findings illuminate the difficulties in constructing valid rates from medical-care claims data and emphasize potential biases due to problems of comparability between populations. We also address the potential value of such comparisons for helping corporations identify areas in which cost-containment efforts may be most effective and yet not jeopardize the quality of medical care.",
author = "Campion, {M. E.} and Naessens, {James M} and Leibson, {C. L.} and D. Shaller and Ballard, {D. J.}",
year = "1992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "5--14",
journal = "Mayo Clinic Proceedings",
issn = "0025-6196",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Olmsted County Benchmark Project

T2 - Primary study findings and potential implications for corporate America

AU - Campion, M. E.

AU - Naessens, James M

AU - Leibson, C. L.

AU - Shaller, D.

AU - Ballard, D. J.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Since 1965, expenditures for medical care in the United States have increased 10-fold. As a result, corporate outlays for health benefits have skyrocketed. Employers have instituted various cost-containment measures based in part on reports of wide variations in rates of utilization and the assumption that unnecessary or inappropriate utilization of medical care contributes to increasing costs. Frequently, however, employers lack adequate means for identifying sources of variation or for evaluating its appropriateness. In this article, we report on a project in which hospital utilization among several US corporate populations was compared with that for a geographically defined benchmark population to assist employers in the assessment of their rates of utilization and expenditures and to identify specific areas that merit further investigation. Our findings illuminate the difficulties in constructing valid rates from medical-care claims data and emphasize potential biases due to problems of comparability between populations. We also address the potential value of such comparisons for helping corporations identify areas in which cost-containment efforts may be most effective and yet not jeopardize the quality of medical care.

AB - Since 1965, expenditures for medical care in the United States have increased 10-fold. As a result, corporate outlays for health benefits have skyrocketed. Employers have instituted various cost-containment measures based in part on reports of wide variations in rates of utilization and the assumption that unnecessary or inappropriate utilization of medical care contributes to increasing costs. Frequently, however, employers lack adequate means for identifying sources of variation or for evaluating its appropriateness. In this article, we report on a project in which hospital utilization among several US corporate populations was compared with that for a geographically defined benchmark population to assist employers in the assessment of their rates of utilization and expenditures and to identify specific areas that merit further investigation. Our findings illuminate the difficulties in constructing valid rates from medical-care claims data and emphasize potential biases due to problems of comparability between populations. We also address the potential value of such comparisons for helping corporations identify areas in which cost-containment efforts may be most effective and yet not jeopardize the quality of medical care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026556722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026556722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1732692

AN - SCOPUS:0026556722

VL - 67

SP - 5

EP - 14

JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

SN - 0025-6196

IS - 1

ER -