Abstract
Background: The second consensus criteria for the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy (MSA) are widely recognized as the reference standard for clinical research, but lack sensitivity to diagnose the disease at early stages. Objective: To develop novel Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria for MSA diagnosis using an evidence-based and consensus-based methodology. Methods: We identified shortcomings of the second consensus criteria for MSA diagnosis and conducted a systematic literature review to answer predefined questions on clinical presentation and diagnostic tools relevant for MSA diagnosis. The criteria were developed and later optimized using two Delphi rounds within the MSA Criteria Revision Task Force, a survey for MDS membership, and a virtual Consensus Conference. Results: The criteria for neuropathologically established MSA remain unchanged. For a clinical MSA diagnosis a new category of clinically established MSA is introduced, aiming for maximum specificity with acceptable sensitivity. A category of clinically probable MSA is defined to enhance sensitivity while maintaining specificity. A research category of possible prodromal MSA is designed to capture patients in the earliest stages when symptoms and signs are present, but do not meet the threshold for clinically established or clinically probable MSA. Brain magnetic resonance imaging markers suggestive of MSA are required for the diagnosis of clinically established MSA. The number of research biomarkers that support all clinical diagnostic categories will likely grow. Conclusions: This set of MDS MSA diagnostic criteria aims at improving the diagnostic accuracy, particularly in early disease stages. It requires validation in a prospective clinical and a clinicopathological study.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1131-1148 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Movement Disorders |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2022 |
Keywords
- diagnosis
- diagnostic criteria
- multiple system atrophy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neurology
- Clinical Neurology
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Movement Disorder Society Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
The Movement Disorder Society Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy. / Wenning, Gregor K.; Stankovic, Iva; Vignatelli, Luca et al.
In: Movement Disorders, Vol. 37, No. 6, 06.2022, p. 1131-1148.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The Movement Disorder Society Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy
AU - Wenning, Gregor K.
AU - Stankovic, Iva
AU - Vignatelli, Luca
AU - Fanciulli, Alessandra
AU - Calandra-Buonaura, Giovanna
AU - Seppi, Klaus
AU - Palma, Jose Alberto
AU - Meissner, Wassilios G.
AU - Krismer, Florian
AU - Berg, Daniela
AU - Cortelli, Pietro
AU - Freeman, Roy
AU - Halliday, Glenda
AU - Höglinger, Günter
AU - Lang, Anthony
AU - Ling, Helen
AU - Litvan, Irene
AU - Low, Phillip
AU - Miki, Yasuo
AU - Panicker, Jalesh
AU - Pellecchia, Maria Teresa
AU - Quinn, Niall
AU - Sakakibara, Ryuji
AU - Stamelou, Maria
AU - Tolosa, Eduardo
AU - Tsuji, Shoji
AU - Warner, Tom
AU - Poewe, Werner
AU - Kaufmann, Horacio
N1 - Funding Information: Günter Höglinger: funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy within the framework of the Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (EXC 2145 SyNergy ‐ ID 390857198) and within the Hannover Cluster RESIST (EXC 2155 ‐ ID 390874280), the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, 01KU1403A EpiPD; 01EK1605A HitTau; 01DH18025 TauTherapy), European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases (Improve‐PSP), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, HO2402/18–1 MSAomics), VolkswagenStiftung (Niedersächsisches Vorab), Petermax‐Müller Foundation (Etiology and Therapy of Synucleinopathies and Tauopathies), participated in industry‐sponsored research projects from Abbvie, Biogen, Biohaven, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB. He serves as a consultant for Abbvie, Alzprotect, Asceneuron, Bial, Biogen, Biohaven, Kyowa Kirin, Lundbeck, Novartis, Retrotope, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB; received honoraria for scientific presentations from Abbvie, Bayer Vital, Bial, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Kyowa Kirin, Roche, Teva, UCB, and Zambon; holds a patent Höglinger GU, Höllerhage M, Rösler T. Treatment of Synucleinopathies. United States Patent No.: US 10,918,628 B2, date of patent: February 16, 2021; and received publication royalties from Academic Press, Kohlhammer, and Thieme. Funding Information: Gregor K. Wenning: consultancy and lecture fees from AbbVie, Affiris, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Lundbeck, Merz, Novartis, Ono, Teva, and Theravance; and research grants from the FWF Austrian Science Fund, the Austrian National Bank, the US MSA‐Coalition, Parkinson Fonds Austria, and International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society, outside the submitted work. Funding Information: Alessandra Fanciulli: royalties from Springer Nature Publishing Group and Thieme Verlag; speaker fees and honoraria from International Parkinson Disease and Movement Disorders Society, Austrian Neurology Society, Impact Medicom, Abbvie, and Theravance Biopharma; and research grants from the Stichting ParkinsonFond, US MSA Coalition, Dr Johannes Tuba Stiftung, and the Österreichischer Austausch Dienst, outside of the submitted work. Funding Information: Daniela Berg: consultancies/advisory boards for Biogen, BIAL, UCB Pharma GmbH, Zambon; honoraria for talks/lectures from AbbVie, Bayser, Biogen, BIAL, UCB Pharma GmbH, Zambon, and Desitin; grants/research funding from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), German Parkinson's Disease Association (dPV), BMBF, Parkinson Fonds Deutschland gGmbH, UCB Pharma GmbH, EU, Novartis Pharma GmbH, Lundbeck, and the Damp Foundation. Funding Information: Eduardo Tolosa: received honoraria for consultancy from TEVA, Bial, Prevail Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, and BIOGEN and has received funding for research from the Spanish Network for Research on Neurodegenerative Disorders (CIBERNED) ‐ Instituto Carlos III (ISCIII) and The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research (MJFF). Funding Information: Glenda Halliday: stock ownership in medically‐related fields – Cochlear (2004 onwards) and NIB Holdings (2007 onwards); consultancies ‐ committee work for the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC); employment ‐ University of Sydney; royalties ‐ Academic Press, Elsevier, and Oxford University Press; grants ‐ NHMRC (1,095,127; 1,132,524; 1,176,607; 1,191,407), NIH (12967627), The Michael J. Fox Foundation, Shake‐it‐up Australia, MSA Coalition, Motor Neurone Disease Research Institute of Australia (MNDRIA), University of Sydney, and Aligning Science Across Parkinson's. Funding Information: Florian Krismer: reports receiving personal fees from Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Clarion Healthcare, and the Austrian Society of Neurology; grant support from the MSA Coalition, outside of the submitted work. Funding Information: Helen Ling: CDB Solutions research grant. Funding Information: Jalesh Panicker: undertook this work at University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH)/ University College London (UCL) Institute of Neurology and is supported in part by funding from the United Kingdom's Department of Health National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme. Funding Information: Shoji Tsuji: grant support from Nobelpharma Co., Ltd; and consultancies from Sanwakagaku Kenkyusho, iTRS, and Ono Pharmaceutical. Funding Information: Anthony Lang: served as an advisor for Abbvie, Acorda, AFFiRis, Biogen, Denali, Janssen, Lilly, Lundbeck, Maplight, Paladin, Retrophin, Roche, Sun Pharma, Sunovion, Theravance, and Corticobasal Degeneration Solutions; received honoraria from Sun Pharma, AbbVie, and Sunovion; received grants from Brain Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Corticobasal Degeneration Solutions, Edmond J. Safra Philanthropic Foundation, The Michael J. Fox Foundation, the Ontario Brain Institute, Parkinson Foundation, Parkinson Canada, and W. Garfield Weston Foundation; received publishing royalties from Elsevier, Saunders, Wiley‐Blackwell, Johns Hopkins Press, and Cambridge University Press. Funding Information: Jose‐Alberto Palma: research funding from the National Institutes for Health (NIH), The Michael J. Fox Foundation, MSA Coalition, Familial Dysautonomia Foundation, Food and Drug Administration (FDA); advisory board member for Takeda, Astellas, and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories; managing editor of ; principal investigator in studies funded by Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Theravance Biopharma, and Biogen; salary from Novartis. Clinical Autonomic Research Funding Information: : Glenda Halliday is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Senior Leadership Fellowship. Roy Freeman has received consulting fees and stock options from CND Life Sciences and Inhibikase Therapeutics. Werner Poewe has received personal fees for consultancy from Alterity, Affiris, Biogen, Lundbeck, and Takeda in relation to drug development programs targeting multiple system atrophy. Other authors declare financial disclosures/conflicts of interest related to this work. Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest concerning the research related to the manuscript Funding Information: Irene Litvan: her research is supported by the NIH grants: 2R01AG038791‐06A, U01NS100610, U01NS80818, R25NS098999, U19 AG063911‐1, and 1R21NS114764‐01A1; The Michael J. Fox Foundation, Parkinson Foundation, Lewy Body Association, CurePSP, Roche, Abbvie, Biogen, Centogene, EIP‐Pharma, Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Brain Neurotherapy Bio, and United Biopharma SRL ‐ UCB. She was a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Lundbeck and is a scientific advisor for Amydis and Rossy Center for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy University of Toronto. She receives her salary from the University of California San Diego and as Chief Editor of . Frontiers in Neurology Funding Information: Maria Teresa Pellecchia: personal fees for consultancy and lectures from Zambon, Orion, and Theravance; principal investigator in studies funded by Theravance, Zambon, and Sanofi. Funding Information: Werner Poewe: personal fees for consultancy and lectures from Alterity, AbbVie, Affiris, BIAL, Biogen, Britannia, Lilly, Lundbeck, Neuroderm, Neurocrine, Roche, Takeda, Teva, UCB, and Zambon; and grant support from The Michael J. Fox Foundation and the EU Horizon 2020 programme. Funding Information: Phillip Low: research funding from federal grants (NIH; FDA) R01 NS092625, 1U01NS122419‐01A1, FD‐R‐07290, industry funds (Biohaven, Theravance), Sturm Foundation, and Mayo Funds. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Background: The second consensus criteria for the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy (MSA) are widely recognized as the reference standard for clinical research, but lack sensitivity to diagnose the disease at early stages. Objective: To develop novel Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria for MSA diagnosis using an evidence-based and consensus-based methodology. Methods: We identified shortcomings of the second consensus criteria for MSA diagnosis and conducted a systematic literature review to answer predefined questions on clinical presentation and diagnostic tools relevant for MSA diagnosis. The criteria were developed and later optimized using two Delphi rounds within the MSA Criteria Revision Task Force, a survey for MDS membership, and a virtual Consensus Conference. Results: The criteria for neuropathologically established MSA remain unchanged. For a clinical MSA diagnosis a new category of clinically established MSA is introduced, aiming for maximum specificity with acceptable sensitivity. A category of clinically probable MSA is defined to enhance sensitivity while maintaining specificity. A research category of possible prodromal MSA is designed to capture patients in the earliest stages when symptoms and signs are present, but do not meet the threshold for clinically established or clinically probable MSA. Brain magnetic resonance imaging markers suggestive of MSA are required for the diagnosis of clinically established MSA. The number of research biomarkers that support all clinical diagnostic categories will likely grow. Conclusions: This set of MDS MSA diagnostic criteria aims at improving the diagnostic accuracy, particularly in early disease stages. It requires validation in a prospective clinical and a clinicopathological study.
AB - Background: The second consensus criteria for the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy (MSA) are widely recognized as the reference standard for clinical research, but lack sensitivity to diagnose the disease at early stages. Objective: To develop novel Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria for MSA diagnosis using an evidence-based and consensus-based methodology. Methods: We identified shortcomings of the second consensus criteria for MSA diagnosis and conducted a systematic literature review to answer predefined questions on clinical presentation and diagnostic tools relevant for MSA diagnosis. The criteria were developed and later optimized using two Delphi rounds within the MSA Criteria Revision Task Force, a survey for MDS membership, and a virtual Consensus Conference. Results: The criteria for neuropathologically established MSA remain unchanged. For a clinical MSA diagnosis a new category of clinically established MSA is introduced, aiming for maximum specificity with acceptable sensitivity. A category of clinically probable MSA is defined to enhance sensitivity while maintaining specificity. A research category of possible prodromal MSA is designed to capture patients in the earliest stages when symptoms and signs are present, but do not meet the threshold for clinically established or clinically probable MSA. Brain magnetic resonance imaging markers suggestive of MSA are required for the diagnosis of clinically established MSA. The number of research biomarkers that support all clinical diagnostic categories will likely grow. Conclusions: This set of MDS MSA diagnostic criteria aims at improving the diagnostic accuracy, particularly in early disease stages. It requires validation in a prospective clinical and a clinicopathological study.
KW - diagnosis
KW - diagnostic criteria
KW - multiple system atrophy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128384634&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85128384634&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/mds.29005
DO - 10.1002/mds.29005
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35445419
AN - SCOPUS:85128384634
VL - 37
SP - 1131
EP - 1148
JO - Movement Disorders
JF - Movement Disorders
SN - 0885-3185
IS - 6
ER -