La interpretación de los ensayos clínicos negativos

Translated title of the contribution: The interpretation of negative randomized clinical trials

Francisco Lopez-Jimenez, David Paniagua, Gervasio A. Lamas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Randomized clinical trials without statistically significant differences between treatment groups may provide useful information for clinicians. However, negative trials must be interpreted cautiously, since the absence of evidence of treatment effect is not the same as evidence of absence of treatment effect. Before the reader of a negative article can conclude that one intervention was not better than the other, the potential causes of a negative study should be explored. The objective of this manuscript is to critically describe some of the most common methodological problems that can explain the lack of difference between studied groups in randomized clinical trials.

Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)435-440
Number of pages6
JournalRevista de Investigacion Clinica
Volume50
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Randomized clinical trial
  • Sample size
  • Statistical power

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

La interpretación de los ensayos clínicos negativos. / Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco; Paniagua, David; Lamas, Gervasio A.

In: Revista de Investigacion Clinica, Vol. 50, No. 5, 09.1998, p. 435-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco ; Paniagua, David ; Lamas, Gervasio A. / La interpretación de los ensayos clínicos negativos. In: Revista de Investigacion Clinica. 1998 ; Vol. 50, No. 5. pp. 435-440.
@article{9634bdd43e354f1a98cda0e4d2da37e4,
title = "La interpretaci{\'o}n de los ensayos cl{\'i}nicos negativos",
abstract = "Randomized clinical trials without statistically significant differences between treatment groups may provide useful information for clinicians. However, negative trials must be interpreted cautiously, since the absence of evidence of treatment effect is not the same as evidence of absence of treatment effect. Before the reader of a negative article can conclude that one intervention was not better than the other, the potential causes of a negative study should be explored. The objective of this manuscript is to critically describe some of the most common methodological problems that can explain the lack of difference between studied groups in randomized clinical trials.",
keywords = "Evidence-based medicine, Randomized clinical trial, Sample size, Statistical power",
author = "Francisco Lopez-Jimenez and David Paniagua and Lamas, {Gervasio A.}",
year = "1998",
month = "9",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "50",
pages = "435--440",
journal = "Revista de Investigacion Clinica",
issn = "0034-8376",
publisher = "Instituto Nacional de la Nutricion Salvador Zubiran",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - La interpretación de los ensayos clínicos negativos

AU - Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco

AU - Paniagua, David

AU - Lamas, Gervasio A.

PY - 1998/9

Y1 - 1998/9

N2 - Randomized clinical trials without statistically significant differences between treatment groups may provide useful information for clinicians. However, negative trials must be interpreted cautiously, since the absence of evidence of treatment effect is not the same as evidence of absence of treatment effect. Before the reader of a negative article can conclude that one intervention was not better than the other, the potential causes of a negative study should be explored. The objective of this manuscript is to critically describe some of the most common methodological problems that can explain the lack of difference between studied groups in randomized clinical trials.

AB - Randomized clinical trials without statistically significant differences between treatment groups may provide useful information for clinicians. However, negative trials must be interpreted cautiously, since the absence of evidence of treatment effect is not the same as evidence of absence of treatment effect. Before the reader of a negative article can conclude that one intervention was not better than the other, the potential causes of a negative study should be explored. The objective of this manuscript is to critically describe some of the most common methodological problems that can explain the lack of difference between studied groups in randomized clinical trials.

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Randomized clinical trial

KW - Sample size

KW - Statistical power

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032149573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032149573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9949676

AN - SCOPUS:0032149573

VL - 50

SP - 435

EP - 440

JO - Revista de Investigacion Clinica

JF - Revista de Investigacion Clinica

SN - 0034-8376

IS - 5

ER -