TY - JOUR
T1 - The influence of interfering input from the peroneal nerve on tibial-nerve somatosensory evoked potential
AU - Yamada, Thoru
AU - Saito, Takanori
AU - Matsue, Yoshihiko
AU - Honda, Yoshiho
AU - Fuchigami, Tatsuo
AU - Fujii, Masami
AU - Ross, Mark
PY - 1992/1/1
Y1 - 1992/1/1
N2 - Using a conditioning-test paradigm, we studied the recovery function of tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) conditioned by preceding peroneal nerve stimulation. The inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) ranged from 0 to 400 msec, where 0 msec indicated simultaneous arrival of tibial and peroneal nerve volleys at the L1 spine. The recovery curve was W-shaped, showing two peaks of SEP suppression, maximum at 6 msec ISI (1st phase) and 50-75 ISI msec (2nd phase). In the 1st phase suppression, we found distinct differences in wave forms between 0-2 msec ISI and 4-6 msec ISI. At 0-2 msec ISI, P40-N50-P60 amplitude decreased and latencies shortened, while P31 and N35 were unchanged. At 4-6 msec ISI, all peaks, possibly excluding P31, were markedly depressed. We attribute the former change to an "occlusive effect" and the latter to an "inhibitory effect," each mediated via a central synaptic network between the two nerves. The attenuation of the 2nd but not the 1st phase suppression by peroneal nerve block distal to the stimulating electrodes provided evidence that the 2nd phase suppression resulted primarily from interfering afferent signals generated by peroneal nerve peripheral receptors, activated by foot movement.
AB - Using a conditioning-test paradigm, we studied the recovery function of tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) conditioned by preceding peroneal nerve stimulation. The inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) ranged from 0 to 400 msec, where 0 msec indicated simultaneous arrival of tibial and peroneal nerve volleys at the L1 spine. The recovery curve was W-shaped, showing two peaks of SEP suppression, maximum at 6 msec ISI (1st phase) and 50-75 ISI msec (2nd phase). In the 1st phase suppression, we found distinct differences in wave forms between 0-2 msec ISI and 4-6 msec ISI. At 0-2 msec ISI, P40-N50-P60 amplitude decreased and latencies shortened, while P31 and N35 were unchanged. At 4-6 msec ISI, all peaks, possibly excluding P31, were markedly depressed. We attribute the former change to an "occlusive effect" and the latter to an "inhibitory effect," each mediated via a central synaptic network between the two nerves. The attenuation of the 2nd but not the 1st phase suppression by peroneal nerve block distal to the stimulating electrodes provided evidence that the 2nd phase suppression resulted primarily from interfering afferent signals generated by peroneal nerve peripheral receptors, activated by foot movement.
KW - Gating
KW - Peroneal nerve
KW - Recovery function
KW - Somatosensory evoked potential
KW - Synaptic inhibition
KW - Synaptic occlusion
KW - Tibial nerve
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026440352&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026440352&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90038-D
DO - 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90038-D
M3 - Article
C2 - 1280195
AN - SCOPUS:0026440352
SN - 0168-5597
VL - 84
SP - 492
EP - 498
JO - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials
JF - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials
IS - 6
ER -