The influence of impression management scales on the Personality Assessment Inventory in the epilepsy monitoring unit

Catherine L. Purdom, Kristin A. Kirlin, Matthew T. Hoerth, Katherine H. Noe, Joseph F. Drazkowski, Joseph I. Sirven, Dona E Locke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Somatic Complaints scale (SOM) and Conversion subscale (SOM-C) of the Personality Assessment Inventory perform best in classifying psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) from epileptic seizures (ES); however, the impact of positive impression management (PIM) and negative impression management (NIM) scales on SOM and SOM-C classification has not been examined. We studied 187 patients from an epilepsy monitoring unit with confirmed PNES or ES. On SOM, the best cut score was 72.5. T when PIM was elevated and 69.5. T when there was no bias. On SOM-C, when PIM was elevated, the best cut score was 67.5. T and 76.5. T when there was no bias. Negative impression management elevations (n = 9) were too infrequent to analyze separately. Despite similarities in classification accuracy, there were differences in sensitivity and specificity with and without PIM, impacting positive and negative predictive values. The presence of PIM bias generally increases positive predictive power of SOM and SOM-C but decreases negative predictive power.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)534-538
Number of pages5
JournalEpilepsy and Behavior
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

Personality Assessment
Personality Inventory
Epilepsy
Seizures
Physiologic Monitoring
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • EMU
  • Epilepsy
  • Neuropsychology
  • PAI
  • Psychogenic seizures
  • Response bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Neurology

Cite this

The influence of impression management scales on the Personality Assessment Inventory in the epilepsy monitoring unit. / Purdom, Catherine L.; Kirlin, Kristin A.; Hoerth, Matthew T.; Noe, Katherine H.; Drazkowski, Joseph F.; Sirven, Joseph I.; Locke, Dona E.

In: Epilepsy and Behavior, Vol. 25, No. 4, 12.2012, p. 534-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Purdom, Catherine L. ; Kirlin, Kristin A. ; Hoerth, Matthew T. ; Noe, Katherine H. ; Drazkowski, Joseph F. ; Sirven, Joseph I. ; Locke, Dona E. / The influence of impression management scales on the Personality Assessment Inventory in the epilepsy monitoring unit. In: Epilepsy and Behavior. 2012 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 534-538.
@article{17b70bd371cf4ad8862d74a4f35c0f2e,
title = "The influence of impression management scales on the Personality Assessment Inventory in the epilepsy monitoring unit",
abstract = "The Somatic Complaints scale (SOM) and Conversion subscale (SOM-C) of the Personality Assessment Inventory perform best in classifying psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) from epileptic seizures (ES); however, the impact of positive impression management (PIM) and negative impression management (NIM) scales on SOM and SOM-C classification has not been examined. We studied 187 patients from an epilepsy monitoring unit with confirmed PNES or ES. On SOM, the best cut score was 72.5. T when PIM was elevated and 69.5. T when there was no bias. On SOM-C, when PIM was elevated, the best cut score was 67.5. T and 76.5. T when there was no bias. Negative impression management elevations (n = 9) were too infrequent to analyze separately. Despite similarities in classification accuracy, there were differences in sensitivity and specificity with and without PIM, impacting positive and negative predictive values. The presence of PIM bias generally increases positive predictive power of SOM and SOM-C but decreases negative predictive power.",
keywords = "EMU, Epilepsy, Neuropsychology, PAI, Psychogenic seizures, Response bias",
author = "Purdom, {Catherine L.} and Kirlin, {Kristin A.} and Hoerth, {Matthew T.} and Noe, {Katherine H.} and Drazkowski, {Joseph F.} and Sirven, {Joseph I.} and Locke, {Dona E}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.10.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "534--538",
journal = "Epilepsy and Behavior",
issn = "1525-5050",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of impression management scales on the Personality Assessment Inventory in the epilepsy monitoring unit

AU - Purdom, Catherine L.

AU - Kirlin, Kristin A.

AU - Hoerth, Matthew T.

AU - Noe, Katherine H.

AU - Drazkowski, Joseph F.

AU - Sirven, Joseph I.

AU - Locke, Dona E

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - The Somatic Complaints scale (SOM) and Conversion subscale (SOM-C) of the Personality Assessment Inventory perform best in classifying psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) from epileptic seizures (ES); however, the impact of positive impression management (PIM) and negative impression management (NIM) scales on SOM and SOM-C classification has not been examined. We studied 187 patients from an epilepsy monitoring unit with confirmed PNES or ES. On SOM, the best cut score was 72.5. T when PIM was elevated and 69.5. T when there was no bias. On SOM-C, when PIM was elevated, the best cut score was 67.5. T and 76.5. T when there was no bias. Negative impression management elevations (n = 9) were too infrequent to analyze separately. Despite similarities in classification accuracy, there were differences in sensitivity and specificity with and without PIM, impacting positive and negative predictive values. The presence of PIM bias generally increases positive predictive power of SOM and SOM-C but decreases negative predictive power.

AB - The Somatic Complaints scale (SOM) and Conversion subscale (SOM-C) of the Personality Assessment Inventory perform best in classifying psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) from epileptic seizures (ES); however, the impact of positive impression management (PIM) and negative impression management (NIM) scales on SOM and SOM-C classification has not been examined. We studied 187 patients from an epilepsy monitoring unit with confirmed PNES or ES. On SOM, the best cut score was 72.5. T when PIM was elevated and 69.5. T when there was no bias. On SOM-C, when PIM was elevated, the best cut score was 67.5. T and 76.5. T when there was no bias. Negative impression management elevations (n = 9) were too infrequent to analyze separately. Despite similarities in classification accuracy, there were differences in sensitivity and specificity with and without PIM, impacting positive and negative predictive values. The presence of PIM bias generally increases positive predictive power of SOM and SOM-C but decreases negative predictive power.

KW - EMU

KW - Epilepsy

KW - Neuropsychology

KW - PAI

KW - Psychogenic seizures

KW - Response bias

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871830710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871830710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.10.005

DO - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.10.005

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 534

EP - 538

JO - Epilepsy and Behavior

JF - Epilepsy and Behavior

SN - 1525-5050

IS - 4

ER -