The incidence of clinically diagnosed versus research-identified autism in olmsted county, minnesota, 1976-1997: Results from a retrospective, population-based study

William J. Barbaresi, Robert C. Colligan, Amy L. Weaver, Slavica K. Katusic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

Autism prevalence studies have often relied on administrative prevalence or clinical diagnosis as case-identification strategies. We report the incidence of clinical diagnoses of autism spectrum disorders (ASD), versus research-identified autism among residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, age =21 years, from 1976-1997. The incidence of clinically diagnosed ASD (with 95% CI) was 1.5 per 100,000 (0.0-3.7) in 1980-1983 and 33.1 (22.8-43.3) in 1995-1997, a 22.1-fold increase. In contrast, the incidence of research-identified autism increased from 5.5 (1.4-9.5) per 100,000 to 44.9 (32.9-56.9), an 8.2-fold increase. Only 46.8% of research-identified cases received a clinical diagnosis of ASD. These findings demonstrate the potential for misleading interpretation of results from epidemiologic studies that rely on clinical diagnosis of autism to identify cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)464-470
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Keywords

  • Autism
  • Autistic disorder
  • Epidemiology
  • Incidence
  • Population-based

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The incidence of clinically diagnosed versus research-identified autism in olmsted county, minnesota, 1976-1997: Results from a retrospective, population-based study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this