TY - JOUR
T1 - The importance of forward flow and venous congestion in diuretic response in acute heart failure
T2 - Insights from the ESCAPE trial
AU - Eder, Maxwell
AU - Griffin, Matthew
AU - Moreno-Villagomez, Julieta
AU - Bellumkonda, Lavanya
AU - Maulion, Christopher
AU - Asher, Jennifer
AU - Wilson, Francis P.
AU - Cox, Zachary L.
AU - Ivey-Miranda, Juan B.
AU - Rao, Veena S.
AU - Butler, Javed
AU - Borlaug, Barry A.
AU - McCallum, Wendy
AU - Ramos-Mastache, Daniela
AU - Testani, Jeffrey M.
N1 - Funding Information:
National Institutes of Health (NIH) K23HL114868, L30HL115790, R01HL139629, R21HL143092, R01HL128973, and R01HL148354 (to JMT). The funding source had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation. The contents of this manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NIH.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/6/15
Y1 - 2023/6/15
N2 - Aims: Previous studies have suggested venous congestion as a stronger mediator of negative cardio-renal interactions than low cardiac output, with neither factor having a dominant role. While the influence of these parameters on glomerular filtration have been described, the impact on diuretic responsiveness is unclear. The goal of this analysis was to understand the hemodynamic correlates of diuretic response in hospitalized patients with heart failure. Methods and results: We analyzed patients from the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness (ESCAPE) dataset. Diuretic efficiency (DE) was defined as the average daily net fluid output per doubling of the peak loop diuretic dose. We evaluated a pulmonary artery catheter hemodynamic-guided cohort (n = 190) and a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) cohort (n = 324) where DE was evaluated with hemodynamic and TTE parameters. Metrics of “forward flow” such as cardiac index, mean arterial pressure and left ventricular ejection fraction were not associated with DE (p > 0.2 for all). Worse baseline venous congestion was paradoxically associated with better DE as assessed by right atrial pressure (RAP), right atrial area (RAA), and right ventricular systolic and diastolic area (p < 0.05 for all). Renal perfusion pressure (capturing both congestion and forward flow) was not associated with diuretic response (p = 0.84). Conclusions: Worse venous congestion was weakly associated with better loop diuretic response. Metrics of “forward flow” did not demonstrate any correlation with diuretic response. These observations raise questions about the concept of central hemodynamic perturbations as the primary drivers of diuretic resistance on a population level in HF.
AB - Aims: Previous studies have suggested venous congestion as a stronger mediator of negative cardio-renal interactions than low cardiac output, with neither factor having a dominant role. While the influence of these parameters on glomerular filtration have been described, the impact on diuretic responsiveness is unclear. The goal of this analysis was to understand the hemodynamic correlates of diuretic response in hospitalized patients with heart failure. Methods and results: We analyzed patients from the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness (ESCAPE) dataset. Diuretic efficiency (DE) was defined as the average daily net fluid output per doubling of the peak loop diuretic dose. We evaluated a pulmonary artery catheter hemodynamic-guided cohort (n = 190) and a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) cohort (n = 324) where DE was evaluated with hemodynamic and TTE parameters. Metrics of “forward flow” such as cardiac index, mean arterial pressure and left ventricular ejection fraction were not associated with DE (p > 0.2 for all). Worse baseline venous congestion was paradoxically associated with better DE as assessed by right atrial pressure (RAP), right atrial area (RAA), and right ventricular systolic and diastolic area (p < 0.05 for all). Renal perfusion pressure (capturing both congestion and forward flow) was not associated with diuretic response (p = 0.84). Conclusions: Worse venous congestion was weakly associated with better loop diuretic response. Metrics of “forward flow” did not demonstrate any correlation with diuretic response. These observations raise questions about the concept of central hemodynamic perturbations as the primary drivers of diuretic resistance on a population level in HF.
KW - Acute decompensated heart failure
KW - Diuretic resistance
KW - ESCAPE
KW - Hemodynamics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152519411&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85152519411&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.04.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.04.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 37023862
AN - SCOPUS:85152519411
SN - 0167-5273
VL - 381
SP - 57
EP - 61
JO - International Journal of Cardiology
JF - International Journal of Cardiology
ER -