TY - JOUR
T1 - The Impact of Antifungal Prophylaxis in Lung Transplant Recipients
AU - Pennington, Kelly M.
AU - Dykhoff, Hayley J.
AU - Yao, Xiaoxi
AU - Sangaralingham, Lindsey R.
AU - Shah, Nilay D.
AU - Peters, Steve G.
AU - Barreto, Jason N.
AU - Razonable, Raymund R.
AU - Kennedy, Cassie C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.M.P.). Over the last 36 months, N.D.S. has received research support through Mayo Clinic from the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, from the Food and Drug Administration (U01FD004585), from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS025164, R01HS025402, R03HS025517; and U19HS024075), from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (R56HL130496 and R01HL131535), from the Medical Devices Innovation Consortium/ National Evaluation System for Health Technology, from the National Science Foundation, and from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. C.C.K. is supported by a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant (K23 HL128859) from the National Institutes of Health. The manuscript’s contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 by the American Thoracic Society
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Rationale: Many lung transplant centers prescribe antifungal medications after transplantation to prevent invasive fungal infections (IFIs); however, the effectiveness of antifungal prophylaxis at reducing the risk of all-cause mortality or IFI has not been established. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effect of antifungal prophylaxis on all-cause mortality and IFI in lung transplant patients. Methods: Using administrative claims data, we identified adult patients who underwent lung transplantation between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018. Propensity score analysis using inverse probability treatment–weighting approach was used to balance the differences in baseline characteristics between those receiving antifungal prophylaxis and those not receiving antifungal prophylaxis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare rates of all-cause mortality and IFI in both groups. Results: We identified 662 lung transplant recipients (LTRs) (387 received prophylaxis and 275 did not). All-cause mortality was significantly lower in those receiving antifungal prophylaxis compared with those not receiving antifungal prophylaxis (event rate per 100 person-years, 8.36 vs. 19.49; hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.26–0.71; P = 0.003). Patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis had a lower rate of IFI compared with those not receiving prophylaxis (event rate per 100 person-years, 14.94 vs. 22.37; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.44–1.05; P = 0.079), but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: In this real-world analysis, antifungal prophylaxis in LTRs was associated with reduced all-cause mortality compared with those not receiving antifungal prophylaxis. Rates of IFI were also lower in those receiving prophylaxis, but this was not statistically significant in our primary analysis.
AB - Rationale: Many lung transplant centers prescribe antifungal medications after transplantation to prevent invasive fungal infections (IFIs); however, the effectiveness of antifungal prophylaxis at reducing the risk of all-cause mortality or IFI has not been established. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effect of antifungal prophylaxis on all-cause mortality and IFI in lung transplant patients. Methods: Using administrative claims data, we identified adult patients who underwent lung transplantation between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018. Propensity score analysis using inverse probability treatment–weighting approach was used to balance the differences in baseline characteristics between those receiving antifungal prophylaxis and those not receiving antifungal prophylaxis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare rates of all-cause mortality and IFI in both groups. Results: We identified 662 lung transplant recipients (LTRs) (387 received prophylaxis and 275 did not). All-cause mortality was significantly lower in those receiving antifungal prophylaxis compared with those not receiving antifungal prophylaxis (event rate per 100 person-years, 8.36 vs. 19.49; hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.26–0.71; P = 0.003). Patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis had a lower rate of IFI compared with those not receiving prophylaxis (event rate per 100 person-years, 14.94 vs. 22.37; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.44–1.05; P = 0.079), but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: In this real-world analysis, antifungal prophylaxis in LTRs was associated with reduced all-cause mortality compared with those not receiving antifungal prophylaxis. Rates of IFI were also lower in those receiving prophylaxis, but this was not statistically significant in our primary analysis.
KW - Antifungal prophylaxis
KW - Aspergillus
KW - Fungal infections
KW - Lung transplant
KW - Triazole
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101929006&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101929006&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202003-267OC
DO - 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202003-267OC
M3 - Article
C2 - 32962402
AN - SCOPUS:85101929006
SN - 2325-6621
VL - 18
SP - 468
EP - 476
JO - Annals of the American Thoracic Society
JF - Annals of the American Thoracic Society
IS - 3
ER -