The germline MLH1 K618A variant and susceptibility to lynch syndrome-associated tumors

Fabiola Medeiros, Noralane M. Lindor, Fergus J. Couch, W. Edward Highsmith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Missense variants discovered during sequencing of cancer susceptibility genes can be problematic for clinical interpretation. MLH1 K618A, which results from a 2-bp alteration (AAG→GCG) leading to a substitution of lysine to alanine in codon 618, has variously been interpreted as a pathogenic mutation, a variant of unknown significance, and a benign polymorphism. We evaluated the role of MLH1 K618A in predisposition to cancer by genotyping 1512 control subjects to assess its frequency in the general population. We also reviewed the literature concerning MLH1 K618A in families with colorectal cancer. The measured allele frequency of the K618A variant was 0.40%, which is remarkably close to the 0.44% summarized from 2491 control subjects in the literature. K618A was over-represented in families with suspected Lynch syndrome. In 1366 families, the allele frequency was 0.88% (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.3 to 3.5; P = 0.006). In studies of sporadic cancers of the type associated with Lynch syndrome, K618A was over-represented in 1742 cases (allele frequency of 0.83) (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.2 to 3.2; P = 0.008). We conclude that MLH1 K618A is not a fully penetrant Lynch syndrome mutation, although it is not without effect, appearing to increase the risk of Lynch syndrome-associated tumors approximately twofold. Our systematic assessment approach may be useful for variants in other genes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)264-273
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Molecular Diagnostics
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Molecular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The germline MLH1 K618A variant and susceptibility to lynch syndrome-associated tumors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this