The effects of survey mode and asking about future intentions on self-reports of colorectal cancer screening

Timothy J. Beebe, Sarah M. Jenkins, Kari J. Anderson, Michael E. Davern, Todd H. Rockwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are often ascertained via self-reports but can be subject to overreporting bias. Asking about intention to get screened before asking about past screening may minimize overreporting of cancer screening. In a statewide survey conducted from July through October of 2005, we embedded an experiment that tested the effect of question ordering (asking about future intention to get screened before or after asking about past screening; "future first" and "future second," respectively), crossed with survey mode (mail versus telephone), on CRC screening rates. Weighted analysis focused on 752 respondents who were ages 50 years or older. We found (a) that asking about future intentions to get screened before asking about past screening (future first) statistically significantly lowers reports of past CRC screening [70.9% future second versus 58.0% future first; odds ratio (OR), 1.83; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.08-3.13]; (b) that there was no main effect of survey mode; and (c) that the effect of the ordering of the future intentions item varies by survey mode. In the mailed survey, the odds of reporting past CRC screening were almost thrice greater in the future second condition compared with the future first condition (72.4% versus 49.0%, respectively; OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.22-6.17). In the telephone condition, the odds of reporting were only 28% higher in the future second (69.5%) condition than in the future first condition (63.9%; OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.64-2.57). The results suggest that asking about future intentions to get screened before the actual behavior elicits lower, and arguably more truthful reports of CRC screening but mainly in mailed surveys.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)785-790
Number of pages6
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Self Report
Colorectal Neoplasms
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Telephone
Postal Service
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology

Cite this

The effects of survey mode and asking about future intentions on self-reports of colorectal cancer screening. / Beebe, Timothy J.; Jenkins, Sarah M.; Anderson, Kari J.; Davern, Michael E.; Rockwood, Todd H.

In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, Vol. 17, No. 4, 04.2008, p. 785-790.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beebe, Timothy J. ; Jenkins, Sarah M. ; Anderson, Kari J. ; Davern, Michael E. ; Rockwood, Todd H. / The effects of survey mode and asking about future intentions on self-reports of colorectal cancer screening. In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2008 ; Vol. 17, No. 4. pp. 785-790.
@article{5d7ca680461e4e0a9413ed30faeadd2e,
title = "The effects of survey mode and asking about future intentions on self-reports of colorectal cancer screening",
abstract = "Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are often ascertained via self-reports but can be subject to overreporting bias. Asking about intention to get screened before asking about past screening may minimize overreporting of cancer screening. In a statewide survey conducted from July through October of 2005, we embedded an experiment that tested the effect of question ordering (asking about future intention to get screened before or after asking about past screening; {"}future first{"} and {"}future second,{"} respectively), crossed with survey mode (mail versus telephone), on CRC screening rates. Weighted analysis focused on 752 respondents who were ages 50 years or older. We found (a) that asking about future intentions to get screened before asking about past screening (future first) statistically significantly lowers reports of past CRC screening [70.9{\%} future second versus 58.0{\%} future first; odds ratio (OR), 1.83; 95{\%} confidence interval (95{\%} CI), 1.08-3.13]; (b) that there was no main effect of survey mode; and (c) that the effect of the ordering of the future intentions item varies by survey mode. In the mailed survey, the odds of reporting past CRC screening were almost thrice greater in the future second condition compared with the future first condition (72.4{\%} versus 49.0{\%}, respectively; OR, 2.74; 95{\%} CI, 1.22-6.17). In the telephone condition, the odds of reporting were only 28{\%} higher in the future second (69.5{\%}) condition than in the future first condition (63.9{\%}; OR, 1.28; 95{\%} CI, 0.64-2.57). The results suggest that asking about future intentions to get screened before the actual behavior elicits lower, and arguably more truthful reports of CRC screening but mainly in mailed surveys.",
author = "Beebe, {Timothy J.} and Jenkins, {Sarah M.} and Anderson, {Kari J.} and Davern, {Michael E.} and Rockwood, {Todd H.}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2622",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "785--790",
journal = "Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention",
issn = "1055-9965",
publisher = "American Association for Cancer Research Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of survey mode and asking about future intentions on self-reports of colorectal cancer screening

AU - Beebe, Timothy J.

AU - Jenkins, Sarah M.

AU - Anderson, Kari J.

AU - Davern, Michael E.

AU - Rockwood, Todd H.

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are often ascertained via self-reports but can be subject to overreporting bias. Asking about intention to get screened before asking about past screening may minimize overreporting of cancer screening. In a statewide survey conducted from July through October of 2005, we embedded an experiment that tested the effect of question ordering (asking about future intention to get screened before or after asking about past screening; "future first" and "future second," respectively), crossed with survey mode (mail versus telephone), on CRC screening rates. Weighted analysis focused on 752 respondents who were ages 50 years or older. We found (a) that asking about future intentions to get screened before asking about past screening (future first) statistically significantly lowers reports of past CRC screening [70.9% future second versus 58.0% future first; odds ratio (OR), 1.83; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.08-3.13]; (b) that there was no main effect of survey mode; and (c) that the effect of the ordering of the future intentions item varies by survey mode. In the mailed survey, the odds of reporting past CRC screening were almost thrice greater in the future second condition compared with the future first condition (72.4% versus 49.0%, respectively; OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.22-6.17). In the telephone condition, the odds of reporting were only 28% higher in the future second (69.5%) condition than in the future first condition (63.9%; OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.64-2.57). The results suggest that asking about future intentions to get screened before the actual behavior elicits lower, and arguably more truthful reports of CRC screening but mainly in mailed surveys.

AB - Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are often ascertained via self-reports but can be subject to overreporting bias. Asking about intention to get screened before asking about past screening may minimize overreporting of cancer screening. In a statewide survey conducted from July through October of 2005, we embedded an experiment that tested the effect of question ordering (asking about future intention to get screened before or after asking about past screening; "future first" and "future second," respectively), crossed with survey mode (mail versus telephone), on CRC screening rates. Weighted analysis focused on 752 respondents who were ages 50 years or older. We found (a) that asking about future intentions to get screened before asking about past screening (future first) statistically significantly lowers reports of past CRC screening [70.9% future second versus 58.0% future first; odds ratio (OR), 1.83; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.08-3.13]; (b) that there was no main effect of survey mode; and (c) that the effect of the ordering of the future intentions item varies by survey mode. In the mailed survey, the odds of reporting past CRC screening were almost thrice greater in the future second condition compared with the future first condition (72.4% versus 49.0%, respectively; OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.22-6.17). In the telephone condition, the odds of reporting were only 28% higher in the future second (69.5%) condition than in the future first condition (63.9%; OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.64-2.57). The results suggest that asking about future intentions to get screened before the actual behavior elicits lower, and arguably more truthful reports of CRC screening but mainly in mailed surveys.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42149188193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42149188193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2622

DO - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2622

M3 - Article

C2 - 18381470

AN - SCOPUS:42149188193

VL - 17

SP - 785

EP - 790

JO - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

JF - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

SN - 1055-9965

IS - 4

ER -