The Effects of First Year Medical Students’ Gender and Career Interest on Educational Gains from Longitudinal Cases

Mark Sandefur, Jodi Blustin, Justin Juskewitch, Sara Aberle, Elizabeth Angstman, Paul Warner, Wojciech Pawlina, Joseph Peter Grande

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

There is little research to date regarding the effectiveness of longitudinal case-based assignments in the education of first year medical students. Such assignments were recently added to the curriculum of the Anatomy and Pathology courses at Mayo Medical School in order to increase students’ understanding of the clinical relevance of information they learned in didactics. This study was designed to assess whether certain subpopulations of students achieved greater benefit from the use of these assignments. Longitudinal cases that focused on clinical aspects of disease (patient presentation, assessment, differential diagnosis, treatment options, and psychosocial issues) were assigned weekly during Anatomy and Pathology. Following these courses, students were surveyed regarding perceived benefit of the assignments in helping them to understand the didactic information they were learning from a clinical perspective. Survey responses and student assignment grades were analyzed based on groupings by career interest and gender. Survey response differences were striking when grouped by general career interests. Students undecided about their future career interests perceived significantly less benefit from the longitudinal assignments than their peers who were interested in a particular field of medicine in terms of gathering clinical information, developing diagnoses and treatment plans, integrating didactic information with clinical knowledge, and overall value of the assignments. Students with no specific career interest also had significantly lower assignment grades than those who had a specific field of interest. Survey responses did not differ significantly across gender. Comparison of students’ grades when grouped by gender demonstrated a trend toward significance, with females outperforming males on these assignments. In summary, students with no specified career preference perceived markedly less benefit and performed poorer on longitudinal case-based assignments than students with a specified career interest, while gender differences displayed no significant associations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2-9
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Science Educator
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2012

Fingerprint

first-year student
Medical Students
medical student
career
Students
gender
student
didactics
pathology
Anatomy
Pathology
Medical Schools
Curriculum
grouping
gender-specific factors
Differential Diagnosis
Medicine
Learning
medicine
Disease

Keywords

  • career interest
  • Gender
  • longitudinal cases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Education

Cite this

The Effects of First Year Medical Students’ Gender and Career Interest on Educational Gains from Longitudinal Cases. / Sandefur, Mark; Blustin, Jodi; Juskewitch, Justin; Aberle, Sara; Angstman, Elizabeth; Warner, Paul; Pawlina, Wojciech; Grande, Joseph Peter.

In: Medical Science Educator, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.03.2012, p. 2-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sandefur, Mark ; Blustin, Jodi ; Juskewitch, Justin ; Aberle, Sara ; Angstman, Elizabeth ; Warner, Paul ; Pawlina, Wojciech ; Grande, Joseph Peter. / The Effects of First Year Medical Students’ Gender and Career Interest on Educational Gains from Longitudinal Cases. In: Medical Science Educator. 2012 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 2-9.
@article{bd6a498a8fcb46f191c012d3bbf4f2ae,
title = "The Effects of First Year Medical Students’ Gender and Career Interest on Educational Gains from Longitudinal Cases",
abstract = "There is little research to date regarding the effectiveness of longitudinal case-based assignments in the education of first year medical students. Such assignments were recently added to the curriculum of the Anatomy and Pathology courses at Mayo Medical School in order to increase students’ understanding of the clinical relevance of information they learned in didactics. This study was designed to assess whether certain subpopulations of students achieved greater benefit from the use of these assignments. Longitudinal cases that focused on clinical aspects of disease (patient presentation, assessment, differential diagnosis, treatment options, and psychosocial issues) were assigned weekly during Anatomy and Pathology. Following these courses, students were surveyed regarding perceived benefit of the assignments in helping them to understand the didactic information they were learning from a clinical perspective. Survey responses and student assignment grades were analyzed based on groupings by career interest and gender. Survey response differences were striking when grouped by general career interests. Students undecided about their future career interests perceived significantly less benefit from the longitudinal assignments than their peers who were interested in a particular field of medicine in terms of gathering clinical information, developing diagnoses and treatment plans, integrating didactic information with clinical knowledge, and overall value of the assignments. Students with no specific career interest also had significantly lower assignment grades than those who had a specific field of interest. Survey responses did not differ significantly across gender. Comparison of students’ grades when grouped by gender demonstrated a trend toward significance, with females outperforming males on these assignments. In summary, students with no specified career preference perceived markedly less benefit and performed poorer on longitudinal case-based assignments than students with a specified career interest, while gender differences displayed no significant associations.",
keywords = "career interest, Gender, longitudinal cases",
author = "Mark Sandefur and Jodi Blustin and Justin Juskewitch and Sara Aberle and Elizabeth Angstman and Paul Warner and Wojciech Pawlina and Grande, {Joseph Peter}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF03341745",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "2--9",
journal = "Medical Science Educator",
issn = "2156-8650",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effects of First Year Medical Students’ Gender and Career Interest on Educational Gains from Longitudinal Cases

AU - Sandefur, Mark

AU - Blustin, Jodi

AU - Juskewitch, Justin

AU - Aberle, Sara

AU - Angstman, Elizabeth

AU - Warner, Paul

AU - Pawlina, Wojciech

AU - Grande, Joseph Peter

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - There is little research to date regarding the effectiveness of longitudinal case-based assignments in the education of first year medical students. Such assignments were recently added to the curriculum of the Anatomy and Pathology courses at Mayo Medical School in order to increase students’ understanding of the clinical relevance of information they learned in didactics. This study was designed to assess whether certain subpopulations of students achieved greater benefit from the use of these assignments. Longitudinal cases that focused on clinical aspects of disease (patient presentation, assessment, differential diagnosis, treatment options, and psychosocial issues) were assigned weekly during Anatomy and Pathology. Following these courses, students were surveyed regarding perceived benefit of the assignments in helping them to understand the didactic information they were learning from a clinical perspective. Survey responses and student assignment grades were analyzed based on groupings by career interest and gender. Survey response differences were striking when grouped by general career interests. Students undecided about their future career interests perceived significantly less benefit from the longitudinal assignments than their peers who were interested in a particular field of medicine in terms of gathering clinical information, developing diagnoses and treatment plans, integrating didactic information with clinical knowledge, and overall value of the assignments. Students with no specific career interest also had significantly lower assignment grades than those who had a specific field of interest. Survey responses did not differ significantly across gender. Comparison of students’ grades when grouped by gender demonstrated a trend toward significance, with females outperforming males on these assignments. In summary, students with no specified career preference perceived markedly less benefit and performed poorer on longitudinal case-based assignments than students with a specified career interest, while gender differences displayed no significant associations.

AB - There is little research to date regarding the effectiveness of longitudinal case-based assignments in the education of first year medical students. Such assignments were recently added to the curriculum of the Anatomy and Pathology courses at Mayo Medical School in order to increase students’ understanding of the clinical relevance of information they learned in didactics. This study was designed to assess whether certain subpopulations of students achieved greater benefit from the use of these assignments. Longitudinal cases that focused on clinical aspects of disease (patient presentation, assessment, differential diagnosis, treatment options, and psychosocial issues) were assigned weekly during Anatomy and Pathology. Following these courses, students were surveyed regarding perceived benefit of the assignments in helping them to understand the didactic information they were learning from a clinical perspective. Survey responses and student assignment grades were analyzed based on groupings by career interest and gender. Survey response differences were striking when grouped by general career interests. Students undecided about their future career interests perceived significantly less benefit from the longitudinal assignments than their peers who were interested in a particular field of medicine in terms of gathering clinical information, developing diagnoses and treatment plans, integrating didactic information with clinical knowledge, and overall value of the assignments. Students with no specific career interest also had significantly lower assignment grades than those who had a specific field of interest. Survey responses did not differ significantly across gender. Comparison of students’ grades when grouped by gender demonstrated a trend toward significance, with females outperforming males on these assignments. In summary, students with no specified career preference perceived markedly less benefit and performed poorer on longitudinal case-based assignments than students with a specified career interest, while gender differences displayed no significant associations.

KW - career interest

KW - Gender

KW - longitudinal cases

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886589968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886589968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF03341745

DO - 10.1007/BF03341745

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 2

EP - 9

JO - Medical Science Educator

JF - Medical Science Educator

SN - 2156-8650

IS - 1

ER -