The Effects of Changes in Utilization and Technological Advancements ofCross-Sectional Imaging onRadiologist Workload

Robert McDonald, Kara M. Schwartz, Laurence J. Eckel, Felix E. Diehn, Christopher H. Hunt, Brian Jack Bartholmai, Bradley J Erickson, David F Kallmes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives: To examine the effect of changes in utilization and advances in cross-sectional imaging on radiologists' workload. Materials and Methods: All computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations performed at a single institution between 1999 and 2010 were identified and associated with the total number of images for each examination. Annual trends in institutional numbers of interpreted examinations and images were translated to changes in daily workload for the individual radiologist by normalizing to the number of dedicated daily CT and MRI work assignments, assuming a 255-day/8-hour work day schedule. Temporal changes in institutional and individual workload were assessed by Sen's slope analysis (Q=median slope) and Mann-Kendall test (Z = Z statistic). Results: From 1999 to 2010, a total of 1,517,149 cross-sectional imaging studies (CT=994,471; MRI=522,678) comprising 539,210,581 images (CT=339,830,947; MRI=199,379,634) were evaluated at our institution. Total annual cross-sectional studies steadily increased from 84,409 in 1999 to 147,336 in 2010, representing a twofold increase in workload (Q=6465/year, Z=4.2, P<.0001). Concomitantly, the number of annual departmental cross-sectional images interpreted increased from 9,294,140 in 1990 to 94,271,551 in 2010, representing a 10-fold increase (Q=8707876/year, Z=4.5, P<.0001). Adjusting for staffing changes, the number of images requiring interpretation per minute of every workday per staff radiologist increased from 2.9 in 1999 to 16.1 in 2010 (Q=1.7/year, Z=4.3, P<.0001). Conclusions: Imaging volumes have grown at a disproportionate rate to imaging utilization increases at our institution. The average radiologist interpreting CT or MRI examinations must now interpret one image every 3-4seconds in an 8-hour workday to meet workload demands.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1191-1198
Number of pages8
JournalAcademic Radiology
Volume22
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Workload
Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Cross-Sectional Studies
Appointments and Schedules
Radiologists

Keywords

  • Cross-sectional imaging
  • Fatigue
  • Imaging volumes
  • Utilization
  • Workload

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

The Effects of Changes in Utilization and Technological Advancements ofCross-Sectional Imaging onRadiologist Workload. / McDonald, Robert; Schwartz, Kara M.; Eckel, Laurence J.; Diehn, Felix E.; Hunt, Christopher H.; Bartholmai, Brian Jack; Erickson, Bradley J; Kallmes, David F.

In: Academic Radiology, Vol. 22, No. 9, 01.09.2015, p. 1191-1198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{120f353ab276438abafd98091815301f,
title = "The Effects of Changes in Utilization and Technological Advancements ofCross-Sectional Imaging onRadiologist Workload",
abstract = "Rationale and Objectives: To examine the effect of changes in utilization and advances in cross-sectional imaging on radiologists' workload. Materials and Methods: All computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations performed at a single institution between 1999 and 2010 were identified and associated with the total number of images for each examination. Annual trends in institutional numbers of interpreted examinations and images were translated to changes in daily workload for the individual radiologist by normalizing to the number of dedicated daily CT and MRI work assignments, assuming a 255-day/8-hour work day schedule. Temporal changes in institutional and individual workload were assessed by Sen's slope analysis (Q=median slope) and Mann-Kendall test (Z = Z statistic). Results: From 1999 to 2010, a total of 1,517,149 cross-sectional imaging studies (CT=994,471; MRI=522,678) comprising 539,210,581 images (CT=339,830,947; MRI=199,379,634) were evaluated at our institution. Total annual cross-sectional studies steadily increased from 84,409 in 1999 to 147,336 in 2010, representing a twofold increase in workload (Q=6465/year, Z=4.2, P<.0001). Concomitantly, the number of annual departmental cross-sectional images interpreted increased from 9,294,140 in 1990 to 94,271,551 in 2010, representing a 10-fold increase (Q=8707876/year, Z=4.5, P<.0001). Adjusting for staffing changes, the number of images requiring interpretation per minute of every workday per staff radiologist increased from 2.9 in 1999 to 16.1 in 2010 (Q=1.7/year, Z=4.3, P<.0001). Conclusions: Imaging volumes have grown at a disproportionate rate to imaging utilization increases at our institution. The average radiologist interpreting CT or MRI examinations must now interpret one image every 3-4seconds in an 8-hour workday to meet workload demands.",
keywords = "Cross-sectional imaging, Fatigue, Imaging volumes, Utilization, Workload",
author = "Robert McDonald and Schwartz, {Kara M.} and Eckel, {Laurence J.} and Diehn, {Felix E.} and Hunt, {Christopher H.} and Bartholmai, {Brian Jack} and Erickson, {Bradley J} and Kallmes, {David F}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.acra.2015.05.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1191--1198",
journal = "Academic Radiology",
issn = "1076-6332",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effects of Changes in Utilization and Technological Advancements ofCross-Sectional Imaging onRadiologist Workload

AU - McDonald, Robert

AU - Schwartz, Kara M.

AU - Eckel, Laurence J.

AU - Diehn, Felix E.

AU - Hunt, Christopher H.

AU - Bartholmai, Brian Jack

AU - Erickson, Bradley J

AU - Kallmes, David F

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Rationale and Objectives: To examine the effect of changes in utilization and advances in cross-sectional imaging on radiologists' workload. Materials and Methods: All computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations performed at a single institution between 1999 and 2010 were identified and associated with the total number of images for each examination. Annual trends in institutional numbers of interpreted examinations and images were translated to changes in daily workload for the individual radiologist by normalizing to the number of dedicated daily CT and MRI work assignments, assuming a 255-day/8-hour work day schedule. Temporal changes in institutional and individual workload were assessed by Sen's slope analysis (Q=median slope) and Mann-Kendall test (Z = Z statistic). Results: From 1999 to 2010, a total of 1,517,149 cross-sectional imaging studies (CT=994,471; MRI=522,678) comprising 539,210,581 images (CT=339,830,947; MRI=199,379,634) were evaluated at our institution. Total annual cross-sectional studies steadily increased from 84,409 in 1999 to 147,336 in 2010, representing a twofold increase in workload (Q=6465/year, Z=4.2, P<.0001). Concomitantly, the number of annual departmental cross-sectional images interpreted increased from 9,294,140 in 1990 to 94,271,551 in 2010, representing a 10-fold increase (Q=8707876/year, Z=4.5, P<.0001). Adjusting for staffing changes, the number of images requiring interpretation per minute of every workday per staff radiologist increased from 2.9 in 1999 to 16.1 in 2010 (Q=1.7/year, Z=4.3, P<.0001). Conclusions: Imaging volumes have grown at a disproportionate rate to imaging utilization increases at our institution. The average radiologist interpreting CT or MRI examinations must now interpret one image every 3-4seconds in an 8-hour workday to meet workload demands.

AB - Rationale and Objectives: To examine the effect of changes in utilization and advances in cross-sectional imaging on radiologists' workload. Materials and Methods: All computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations performed at a single institution between 1999 and 2010 were identified and associated with the total number of images for each examination. Annual trends in institutional numbers of interpreted examinations and images were translated to changes in daily workload for the individual radiologist by normalizing to the number of dedicated daily CT and MRI work assignments, assuming a 255-day/8-hour work day schedule. Temporal changes in institutional and individual workload were assessed by Sen's slope analysis (Q=median slope) and Mann-Kendall test (Z = Z statistic). Results: From 1999 to 2010, a total of 1,517,149 cross-sectional imaging studies (CT=994,471; MRI=522,678) comprising 539,210,581 images (CT=339,830,947; MRI=199,379,634) were evaluated at our institution. Total annual cross-sectional studies steadily increased from 84,409 in 1999 to 147,336 in 2010, representing a twofold increase in workload (Q=6465/year, Z=4.2, P<.0001). Concomitantly, the number of annual departmental cross-sectional images interpreted increased from 9,294,140 in 1990 to 94,271,551 in 2010, representing a 10-fold increase (Q=8707876/year, Z=4.5, P<.0001). Adjusting for staffing changes, the number of images requiring interpretation per minute of every workday per staff radiologist increased from 2.9 in 1999 to 16.1 in 2010 (Q=1.7/year, Z=4.3, P<.0001). Conclusions: Imaging volumes have grown at a disproportionate rate to imaging utilization increases at our institution. The average radiologist interpreting CT or MRI examinations must now interpret one image every 3-4seconds in an 8-hour workday to meet workload demands.

KW - Cross-sectional imaging

KW - Fatigue

KW - Imaging volumes

KW - Utilization

KW - Workload

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938742066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938742066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2015.05.007

DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2015.05.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 26210525

AN - SCOPUS:84938742066

VL - 22

SP - 1191

EP - 1198

JO - Academic Radiology

JF - Academic Radiology

SN - 1076-6332

IS - 9

ER -