The effectiveness of expert witnesses in civil trials involving repressed memories of sexual assault

T. L. Stewart, Stephen Perry Whiteside, J. M. Golding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the impact of expert testimony regarding repressed memories in a childhood sexual assault trial. In Experiment 1 participants read a fictional civil trial summary involving the sexual assault of a 6-year-old female. In the first three conditions, the plaintiff testified immediately, after allegedly repressing the memory of the incident for 20 years, or after a 20-year delay without repression. In a fourth condition, also involving repression, expert testimony regarding memory and repression was added. In a post-hoc condition, experts provided testimony regarding memory recovery techniques. The results indicated that expert testimony did not significantly affect the trial decision. In Experiment 2, participants read the trial summary used in the post-hoc condition and made ratings of guilt and witness believability following each witness. The results indicated that cross-examination effectively counter-balanced the expert's direct testimony. Implications of the results are discussed in terms of past findings and the ecological validity of future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-62
Number of pages36
JournalAmerican Journal of Forensic Psychology
Volume18
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Repression (Psychology)
Expert Testimony
Guilt

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The effectiveness of expert witnesses in civil trials involving repressed memories of sexual assault. / Stewart, T. L.; Whiteside, Stephen Perry; Golding, J. M.

In: American Journal of Forensic Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2000, p. 27-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{70dc7a1b8431470bae0f090c0d7c5d29,
title = "The effectiveness of expert witnesses in civil trials involving repressed memories of sexual assault",
abstract = "Two experiments investigated the impact of expert testimony regarding repressed memories in a childhood sexual assault trial. In Experiment 1 participants read a fictional civil trial summary involving the sexual assault of a 6-year-old female. In the first three conditions, the plaintiff testified immediately, after allegedly repressing the memory of the incident for 20 years, or after a 20-year delay without repression. In a fourth condition, also involving repression, expert testimony regarding memory and repression was added. In a post-hoc condition, experts provided testimony regarding memory recovery techniques. The results indicated that expert testimony did not significantly affect the trial decision. In Experiment 2, participants read the trial summary used in the post-hoc condition and made ratings of guilt and witness believability following each witness. The results indicated that cross-examination effectively counter-balanced the expert's direct testimony. Implications of the results are discussed in terms of past findings and the ecological validity of future research.",
author = "Stewart, {T. L.} and Whiteside, {Stephen Perry} and Golding, {J. M.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "27--62",
journal = "American Journal of Forensic Psychology",
issn = "0733-1290",
publisher = "American College of Forensic Psychology",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effectiveness of expert witnesses in civil trials involving repressed memories of sexual assault

AU - Stewart, T. L.

AU - Whiteside, Stephen Perry

AU - Golding, J. M.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Two experiments investigated the impact of expert testimony regarding repressed memories in a childhood sexual assault trial. In Experiment 1 participants read a fictional civil trial summary involving the sexual assault of a 6-year-old female. In the first three conditions, the plaintiff testified immediately, after allegedly repressing the memory of the incident for 20 years, or after a 20-year delay without repression. In a fourth condition, also involving repression, expert testimony regarding memory and repression was added. In a post-hoc condition, experts provided testimony regarding memory recovery techniques. The results indicated that expert testimony did not significantly affect the trial decision. In Experiment 2, participants read the trial summary used in the post-hoc condition and made ratings of guilt and witness believability following each witness. The results indicated that cross-examination effectively counter-balanced the expert's direct testimony. Implications of the results are discussed in terms of past findings and the ecological validity of future research.

AB - Two experiments investigated the impact of expert testimony regarding repressed memories in a childhood sexual assault trial. In Experiment 1 participants read a fictional civil trial summary involving the sexual assault of a 6-year-old female. In the first three conditions, the plaintiff testified immediately, after allegedly repressing the memory of the incident for 20 years, or after a 20-year delay without repression. In a fourth condition, also involving repression, expert testimony regarding memory and repression was added. In a post-hoc condition, experts provided testimony regarding memory recovery techniques. The results indicated that expert testimony did not significantly affect the trial decision. In Experiment 2, participants read the trial summary used in the post-hoc condition and made ratings of guilt and witness believability following each witness. The results indicated that cross-examination effectively counter-balanced the expert's direct testimony. Implications of the results are discussed in terms of past findings and the ecological validity of future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033786525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033786525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033786525

VL - 18

SP - 27

EP - 62

JO - American Journal of Forensic Psychology

JF - American Journal of Forensic Psychology

SN - 0733-1290

IS - 4

ER -