The effect of new diagnostic criteria for irritable bowel syndrome on community prevalence estimates

Yuri Ann Saito Loftus, N. J. Talley, L. J. Melton, S. Fett, A. R. Zinsmeister, G. R. Locke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 'Rome' criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have evolved over 15 years with four published versions. The impact of these changes on community prevalence rates is not known. Study aims were to estimate the prevalence of IBS using the four Rome criteria and agreement between Rome II and previous criteria. Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of Olmsted County, Minnesota residents in 1992. Age- and gender-adjusted prevalence estimates were calculated for Rome II (1999), Rome I (1992), Rome (1990), and Rome (1989) criteria. Per cent agreement and kappa values were calculated to assess agreement. Of 892 eligible subjects, 643 (72%) responded. The age- and gender-adjusted prevalence of IBS was 5.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.1, 7.0], 6.8% (95% CI: 4.7, 8.9), 5.1% (95% CI: 3.2, 7.1) and 27.6% (95% CI: 23.6, 31.5), respectively. In comparison with Rome II criteria, per cent agreement and κ values were 97.2% and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.88), 96.4% and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.80), and 79.0% and 0.29 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.40), respectively. Thus, although differences were seen with the older criteria, compared with the Rome I criteria, good agreement was seen and community prevalence estimates were similar with the Rome II criteria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)687-694
Number of pages8
JournalNeurogastroenterology and Motility
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2003

Fingerprint

Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • Diagnostic criteria
  • Epidemiology
  • Functional bowel disorder
  • Irritable bowel syndrome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

The effect of new diagnostic criteria for irritable bowel syndrome on community prevalence estimates. / Saito Loftus, Yuri Ann; Talley, N. J.; Melton, L. J.; Fett, S.; Zinsmeister, A. R.; Locke, G. R.

In: Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Vol. 15, No. 6, 12.2003, p. 687-694.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Saito Loftus, Yuri Ann ; Talley, N. J. ; Melton, L. J. ; Fett, S. ; Zinsmeister, A. R. ; Locke, G. R. / The effect of new diagnostic criteria for irritable bowel syndrome on community prevalence estimates. In: Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 2003 ; Vol. 15, No. 6. pp. 687-694.
@article{60e0972b43184fa0a4b06e4f6cf4ba74,
title = "The effect of new diagnostic criteria for irritable bowel syndrome on community prevalence estimates",
abstract = "The 'Rome' criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have evolved over 15 years with four published versions. The impact of these changes on community prevalence rates is not known. Study aims were to estimate the prevalence of IBS using the four Rome criteria and agreement between Rome II and previous criteria. Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of Olmsted County, Minnesota residents in 1992. Age- and gender-adjusted prevalence estimates were calculated for Rome II (1999), Rome I (1992), Rome (1990), and Rome (1989) criteria. Per cent agreement and kappa values were calculated to assess agreement. Of 892 eligible subjects, 643 (72{\%}) responded. The age- and gender-adjusted prevalence of IBS was 5.1{\%} [95{\%} confidence interval (CI): 3.1, 7.0], 6.8{\%} (95{\%} CI: 4.7, 8.9), 5.1{\%} (95{\%} CI: 3.2, 7.1) and 27.6{\%} (95{\%} CI: 23.6, 31.5), respectively. In comparison with Rome II criteria, per cent agreement and κ values were 97.2{\%} and 0.78 (95{\%} CI: 0.69, 0.88), 96.4{\%} and 0.68 (95{\%} CI: 0.55, 0.80), and 79.0{\%} and 0.29 (95{\%} CI: 0.19, 0.40), respectively. Thus, although differences were seen with the older criteria, compared with the Rome I criteria, good agreement was seen and community prevalence estimates were similar with the Rome II criteria.",
keywords = "Diagnostic criteria, Epidemiology, Functional bowel disorder, Irritable bowel syndrome",
author = "{Saito Loftus}, {Yuri Ann} and Talley, {N. J.} and Melton, {L. J.} and S. Fett and Zinsmeister, {A. R.} and Locke, {G. R.}",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1046/j.1350-1925.2003.00441.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "687--694",
journal = "Neurogastroenterology and Motility",
issn = "1350-1925",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of new diagnostic criteria for irritable bowel syndrome on community prevalence estimates

AU - Saito Loftus, Yuri Ann

AU - Talley, N. J.

AU - Melton, L. J.

AU - Fett, S.

AU - Zinsmeister, A. R.

AU - Locke, G. R.

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - The 'Rome' criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have evolved over 15 years with four published versions. The impact of these changes on community prevalence rates is not known. Study aims were to estimate the prevalence of IBS using the four Rome criteria and agreement between Rome II and previous criteria. Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of Olmsted County, Minnesota residents in 1992. Age- and gender-adjusted prevalence estimates were calculated for Rome II (1999), Rome I (1992), Rome (1990), and Rome (1989) criteria. Per cent agreement and kappa values were calculated to assess agreement. Of 892 eligible subjects, 643 (72%) responded. The age- and gender-adjusted prevalence of IBS was 5.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.1, 7.0], 6.8% (95% CI: 4.7, 8.9), 5.1% (95% CI: 3.2, 7.1) and 27.6% (95% CI: 23.6, 31.5), respectively. In comparison with Rome II criteria, per cent agreement and κ values were 97.2% and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.88), 96.4% and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.80), and 79.0% and 0.29 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.40), respectively. Thus, although differences were seen with the older criteria, compared with the Rome I criteria, good agreement was seen and community prevalence estimates were similar with the Rome II criteria.

AB - The 'Rome' criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have evolved over 15 years with four published versions. The impact of these changes on community prevalence rates is not known. Study aims were to estimate the prevalence of IBS using the four Rome criteria and agreement between Rome II and previous criteria. Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of Olmsted County, Minnesota residents in 1992. Age- and gender-adjusted prevalence estimates were calculated for Rome II (1999), Rome I (1992), Rome (1990), and Rome (1989) criteria. Per cent agreement and kappa values were calculated to assess agreement. Of 892 eligible subjects, 643 (72%) responded. The age- and gender-adjusted prevalence of IBS was 5.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.1, 7.0], 6.8% (95% CI: 4.7, 8.9), 5.1% (95% CI: 3.2, 7.1) and 27.6% (95% CI: 23.6, 31.5), respectively. In comparison with Rome II criteria, per cent agreement and κ values were 97.2% and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.88), 96.4% and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.80), and 79.0% and 0.29 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.40), respectively. Thus, although differences were seen with the older criteria, compared with the Rome I criteria, good agreement was seen and community prevalence estimates were similar with the Rome II criteria.

KW - Diagnostic criteria

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Functional bowel disorder

KW - Irritable bowel syndrome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346964512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346964512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1350-1925.2003.00441.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1350-1925.2003.00441.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 14651605

AN - SCOPUS:0346964512

VL - 15

SP - 687

EP - 694

JO - Neurogastroenterology and Motility

JF - Neurogastroenterology and Motility

SN - 1350-1925

IS - 6

ER -