The Disgust Scale: Item Analysis, Factor Structure, and Suggestions for Refinement

Bunmi O. Olatunji, Nathan L. Williams, David F. Tolin, Jonathan S. Abramowitz, Craig Sawchuk, Jeffrey M. Lohr, Lisa S. Elwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

379 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the 4 studies presented (N = 1,939), a converging set of analyses was conducted to evaluate the item adequacy, factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Disgust Scale (DS; J. Haidt, C. McCauley, & P. Rozin, 1994). The results suggest that 7 items (i.e., Items 2, 7, 8, 21, 23, 24, and 25) should be considered for removal from the DS. Secondary to removing the items, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the DS taps 3 dimensions of disgust: Core Disgust, Animal Reminder Disgust, and Contamination-Based Disgust. Women scored higher than men on the 3 disgust dimensions. Structural modeling provided support for the specificity of the 3-factor model, as Core Disgust and Contamination-Based Disgust were significantly predictive of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) concerns, whereas Animal Reminder Disgust was not. Results from a clinical sample indicated that patients with OCD washing concerns scored significantly higher than patients with OCD without washing concerns on both Core Disgust and Contamination-Based Disgust, but not on Animal Reminder Disgust. These findings are discussed in the context of the refinement of the DS to promote a more psychometrically sound assessment of disgust sensitivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-297
Number of pages17
JournalPsychological Assessment
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Statistical Factor Analysis
Reproducibility of Results

Keywords

  • Disgust Scale
  • disgust sensitivity
  • factor analysis
  • obsessive-compulsive disorder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Olatunji, B. O., Williams, N. L., Tolin, D. F., Abramowitz, J. S., Sawchuk, C., Lohr, J. M., & Elwood, L. S. (2007). The Disgust Scale: Item Analysis, Factor Structure, and Suggestions for Refinement. Psychological Assessment, 19(3), 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.281

The Disgust Scale : Item Analysis, Factor Structure, and Suggestions for Refinement. / Olatunji, Bunmi O.; Williams, Nathan L.; Tolin, David F.; Abramowitz, Jonathan S.; Sawchuk, Craig; Lohr, Jeffrey M.; Elwood, Lisa S.

In: Psychological Assessment, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.09.2007, p. 281-297.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Olatunji, BO, Williams, NL, Tolin, DF, Abramowitz, JS, Sawchuk, C, Lohr, JM & Elwood, LS 2007, 'The Disgust Scale: Item Analysis, Factor Structure, and Suggestions for Refinement', Psychological Assessment, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.281
Olatunji, Bunmi O. ; Williams, Nathan L. ; Tolin, David F. ; Abramowitz, Jonathan S. ; Sawchuk, Craig ; Lohr, Jeffrey M. ; Elwood, Lisa S. / The Disgust Scale : Item Analysis, Factor Structure, and Suggestions for Refinement. In: Psychological Assessment. 2007 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 281-297.
@article{cbe5b599df394090b83c1f8eb7ecfbf3,
title = "The Disgust Scale: Item Analysis, Factor Structure, and Suggestions for Refinement",
abstract = "In the 4 studies presented (N = 1,939), a converging set of analyses was conducted to evaluate the item adequacy, factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Disgust Scale (DS; J. Haidt, C. McCauley, & P. Rozin, 1994). The results suggest that 7 items (i.e., Items 2, 7, 8, 21, 23, 24, and 25) should be considered for removal from the DS. Secondary to removing the items, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the DS taps 3 dimensions of disgust: Core Disgust, Animal Reminder Disgust, and Contamination-Based Disgust. Women scored higher than men on the 3 disgust dimensions. Structural modeling provided support for the specificity of the 3-factor model, as Core Disgust and Contamination-Based Disgust were significantly predictive of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) concerns, whereas Animal Reminder Disgust was not. Results from a clinical sample indicated that patients with OCD washing concerns scored significantly higher than patients with OCD without washing concerns on both Core Disgust and Contamination-Based Disgust, but not on Animal Reminder Disgust. These findings are discussed in the context of the refinement of the DS to promote a more psychometrically sound assessment of disgust sensitivity.",
keywords = "Disgust Scale, disgust sensitivity, factor analysis, obsessive-compulsive disorder",
author = "Olatunji, {Bunmi O.} and Williams, {Nathan L.} and Tolin, {David F.} and Abramowitz, {Jonathan S.} and Craig Sawchuk and Lohr, {Jeffrey M.} and Elwood, {Lisa S.}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.281",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "281--297",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Disgust Scale

T2 - Item Analysis, Factor Structure, and Suggestions for Refinement

AU - Olatunji, Bunmi O.

AU - Williams, Nathan L.

AU - Tolin, David F.

AU - Abramowitz, Jonathan S.

AU - Sawchuk, Craig

AU - Lohr, Jeffrey M.

AU - Elwood, Lisa S.

PY - 2007/9/1

Y1 - 2007/9/1

N2 - In the 4 studies presented (N = 1,939), a converging set of analyses was conducted to evaluate the item adequacy, factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Disgust Scale (DS; J. Haidt, C. McCauley, & P. Rozin, 1994). The results suggest that 7 items (i.e., Items 2, 7, 8, 21, 23, 24, and 25) should be considered for removal from the DS. Secondary to removing the items, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the DS taps 3 dimensions of disgust: Core Disgust, Animal Reminder Disgust, and Contamination-Based Disgust. Women scored higher than men on the 3 disgust dimensions. Structural modeling provided support for the specificity of the 3-factor model, as Core Disgust and Contamination-Based Disgust were significantly predictive of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) concerns, whereas Animal Reminder Disgust was not. Results from a clinical sample indicated that patients with OCD washing concerns scored significantly higher than patients with OCD without washing concerns on both Core Disgust and Contamination-Based Disgust, but not on Animal Reminder Disgust. These findings are discussed in the context of the refinement of the DS to promote a more psychometrically sound assessment of disgust sensitivity.

AB - In the 4 studies presented (N = 1,939), a converging set of analyses was conducted to evaluate the item adequacy, factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Disgust Scale (DS; J. Haidt, C. McCauley, & P. Rozin, 1994). The results suggest that 7 items (i.e., Items 2, 7, 8, 21, 23, 24, and 25) should be considered for removal from the DS. Secondary to removing the items, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the DS taps 3 dimensions of disgust: Core Disgust, Animal Reminder Disgust, and Contamination-Based Disgust. Women scored higher than men on the 3 disgust dimensions. Structural modeling provided support for the specificity of the 3-factor model, as Core Disgust and Contamination-Based Disgust were significantly predictive of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) concerns, whereas Animal Reminder Disgust was not. Results from a clinical sample indicated that patients with OCD washing concerns scored significantly higher than patients with OCD without washing concerns on both Core Disgust and Contamination-Based Disgust, but not on Animal Reminder Disgust. These findings are discussed in the context of the refinement of the DS to promote a more psychometrically sound assessment of disgust sensitivity.

KW - Disgust Scale

KW - disgust sensitivity

KW - factor analysis

KW - obsessive-compulsive disorder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34748882974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34748882974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.281

DO - 10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.281

M3 - Article

C2 - 17845120

AN - SCOPUS:34748882974

VL - 19

SP - 281

EP - 297

JO - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

IS - 3

ER -