The decisional conflict scale: Moving from the individual to the dyad level

France Légaré, Annie Leblanc, Hubert Robitaille, Stéphane Turcotte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Decisional conflict is a central determinant of decision making, particularly in the context of uncertainty. It is also one of the most frequently reported outcomes in studies on decision support interventions. Decisional conflict is defined as personal uncertainty about which option to choose. The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) is a self-administered questionnaire that was originally designed to assess decisional conflict in patients. The scale has since been adapted to and tested among health professionals, since decisional conflict as seen by doctors, nurses and other healthcare providers has proven useful in evaluating the quality of the shared decision making (SDM) process. In recent years, however, more and more researchers have found that evaluating the perspectives of the patient and the health professional as interdependent members of a dyad, rather than as two autonomous individuals, offers exciting avenues for developing interventions to improve decision making in the clinical setting. For that reason, the SDM community has increasingly turned its attention to a dyadic approach to SDM. In this paper, we briefly review the history of the Dyadic Decisional Conflict Scale (D-DCS), update its psychometrics based on published work, and propose a research agenda for refining it further.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-252
Number of pages6
JournalZeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen
Volume106
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

dyad
Decision Making
decision making
health professionals
Uncertainty
uncertainty
decision making process
Health
Psychometrics
Health Personnel
psychometrics
Conflict (Psychology)
nurse
History
Nurses
Research Personnel
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
determinants
questionnaire
history

Keywords

  • decisional conflict scale
  • dyadic
  • health professionals
  • patients
  • psychometry
  • shared decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Education

Cite this

The decisional conflict scale : Moving from the individual to the dyad level. / Légaré, France; Leblanc, Annie; Robitaille, Hubert; Turcotte, Stéphane.

In: Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen, Vol. 106, No. 4, 2012, p. 247-252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Légaré, France ; Leblanc, Annie ; Robitaille, Hubert ; Turcotte, Stéphane. / The decisional conflict scale : Moving from the individual to the dyad level. In: Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen. 2012 ; Vol. 106, No. 4. pp. 247-252.
@article{88756ac75b08448283314e94fa486784,
title = "The decisional conflict scale: Moving from the individual to the dyad level",
abstract = "Decisional conflict is a central determinant of decision making, particularly in the context of uncertainty. It is also one of the most frequently reported outcomes in studies on decision support interventions. Decisional conflict is defined as personal uncertainty about which option to choose. The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) is a self-administered questionnaire that was originally designed to assess decisional conflict in patients. The scale has since been adapted to and tested among health professionals, since decisional conflict as seen by doctors, nurses and other healthcare providers has proven useful in evaluating the quality of the shared decision making (SDM) process. In recent years, however, more and more researchers have found that evaluating the perspectives of the patient and the health professional as interdependent members of a dyad, rather than as two autonomous individuals, offers exciting avenues for developing interventions to improve decision making in the clinical setting. For that reason, the SDM community has increasingly turned its attention to a dyadic approach to SDM. In this paper, we briefly review the history of the Dyadic Decisional Conflict Scale (D-DCS), update its psychometrics based on published work, and propose a research agenda for refining it further.",
keywords = "decisional conflict scale, dyadic, health professionals, patients, psychometry, shared decision making",
author = "France L{\'e}gar{\'e} and Annie Leblanc and Hubert Robitaille and St{\'e}phane Turcotte",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.zefq.2012.02.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "247--252",
journal = "Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen",
issn = "1865-9217",
publisher = "Urban und Fischer Verlag Jena",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The decisional conflict scale

T2 - Moving from the individual to the dyad level

AU - Légaré, France

AU - Leblanc, Annie

AU - Robitaille, Hubert

AU - Turcotte, Stéphane

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Decisional conflict is a central determinant of decision making, particularly in the context of uncertainty. It is also one of the most frequently reported outcomes in studies on decision support interventions. Decisional conflict is defined as personal uncertainty about which option to choose. The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) is a self-administered questionnaire that was originally designed to assess decisional conflict in patients. The scale has since been adapted to and tested among health professionals, since decisional conflict as seen by doctors, nurses and other healthcare providers has proven useful in evaluating the quality of the shared decision making (SDM) process. In recent years, however, more and more researchers have found that evaluating the perspectives of the patient and the health professional as interdependent members of a dyad, rather than as two autonomous individuals, offers exciting avenues for developing interventions to improve decision making in the clinical setting. For that reason, the SDM community has increasingly turned its attention to a dyadic approach to SDM. In this paper, we briefly review the history of the Dyadic Decisional Conflict Scale (D-DCS), update its psychometrics based on published work, and propose a research agenda for refining it further.

AB - Decisional conflict is a central determinant of decision making, particularly in the context of uncertainty. It is also one of the most frequently reported outcomes in studies on decision support interventions. Decisional conflict is defined as personal uncertainty about which option to choose. The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) is a self-administered questionnaire that was originally designed to assess decisional conflict in patients. The scale has since been adapted to and tested among health professionals, since decisional conflict as seen by doctors, nurses and other healthcare providers has proven useful in evaluating the quality of the shared decision making (SDM) process. In recent years, however, more and more researchers have found that evaluating the perspectives of the patient and the health professional as interdependent members of a dyad, rather than as two autonomous individuals, offers exciting avenues for developing interventions to improve decision making in the clinical setting. For that reason, the SDM community has increasingly turned its attention to a dyadic approach to SDM. In this paper, we briefly review the history of the Dyadic Decisional Conflict Scale (D-DCS), update its psychometrics based on published work, and propose a research agenda for refining it further.

KW - decisional conflict scale

KW - dyadic

KW - health professionals

KW - patients

KW - psychometry

KW - shared decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863211821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863211821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.02.021

DO - 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.02.021

M3 - Article

C2 - 22749071

AN - SCOPUS:84863211821

VL - 106

SP - 247

EP - 252

JO - Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen

JF - Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen

SN - 1865-9217

IS - 4

ER -