The Cox maze III procedure for atrial fibrillation: Long-term efficacy in patients undergoing lone versus concomitant procedures

Sunil M. Prasad, Hersh S. Maniar, Cindy J. Camillo, Richard B. Schuessler, John P. Boineau, Thoralf M. Sundt, James L. Cox, Ralph J. Damiano, Hartzell V. Schaff, D. Craig Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

388 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: For the last decade, the Cox maze III procedure has been available for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. It is unknown whether the operation has similar efficacy in patients with lone atrial fibrillation compared with that in patients with atrial fibrillation associated with coronary, valve, or congenital heart disease. This study examined the long-term outcome of patients who underwent this procedure either as a lone operation or as a concomitant procedure. Methods: From 1988 to 2001, 198 patients underwent a Cox maze III procedure; 112 were lone operations, and 86 were concomitant procedures. Major complications included renal failure, reoperation for bleeding, mediastinitis, stroke, and balloon pump insertion. Follow-up was performed by means of mail and telephone questionnaires with both the patients and their cardiologists. All patients who had any history of arrhythmia or who were taking medication had their rhythm documented by means of electrocardiography. Results: The lone operation group was significantly younger (51.3 ± 10.5 vs 58.8 ± 9.9 years) and had a higher male/female ratio (4:1 vs 2:1). There was no difference in operative mortality between groups (1.8% vs 1.2%). At a follow-up of 5.4 ± 2.9 years, 96.6% (172/178) of all patients were free of atrial fibrillation. There was no difference between the lone operation and concomitant procedure groups (95.9% vs 97.5%). Conclusion: The Cox maze III procedure has equivalent operative risk and long-term efficacy in patients undergoing both lone operations and concomitant procedures. The Cox maze III procedure remains the standard against which alternative procedures for atrial fibrillation must be judged.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1822-1827
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume126
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2003

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Prasad, S. M., Maniar, H. S., Camillo, C. J., Schuessler, R. B., Boineau, J. P., Sundt, T. M., Cox, J. L., Damiano, R. J., Schaff, H. V., & Miller, D. C. (2003). The Cox maze III procedure for atrial fibrillation: Long-term efficacy in patients undergoing lone versus concomitant procedures. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 126(6), 1822-1827. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(03)01287-X