TY - JOUR
T1 - The biomarker-based diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. 2—lessons from oncology
AU - Geneva Task Force for the Roadmap of Alzheimer's Biomarkers
AU - Boccardi, Marina
AU - Gallo, Valentina
AU - Yasui, Yutaka
AU - Vineis, Paolo
AU - Padovani, Alessandro
AU - Mosimann, Urs
AU - Giannakopoulos, Panteleimon
AU - Gold, Gabriel
AU - Dubois, Bruno
AU - Jack, Clifford R.
AU - Winblad, Bengt
AU - Frisoni, Giovanni B.
AU - Albanese, Emiliano
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - Biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are not yet validated for use in clinical settings. We aim to provide a methodological framework for their systematic validation, by reference to that developed for oncology biomarkers. As for this discipline, the steps for the systematic validation of AD biomarkers need to target analytical validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility. However, the premises are different from oncology: the nature of disease (neurodegeneration vs. cancer), the purpose (improve diagnosis in clinically affected vs. screening preclinical individuals), and the target population (mild cognitive impairment patients referring to memory clinics vs. general population) lead to important differences, influencing both the design of validation studies and the use of selected biomarkers. This framework is applied within a wider initiative to assess the current available evidence on the clinical validity of biomarkers for AD, for the final aim to identify gaps and research priorities, and to inform coordinated research efforts boosting AD biomarkers research.
AB - Biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are not yet validated for use in clinical settings. We aim to provide a methodological framework for their systematic validation, by reference to that developed for oncology biomarkers. As for this discipline, the steps for the systematic validation of AD biomarkers need to target analytical validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility. However, the premises are different from oncology: the nature of disease (neurodegeneration vs. cancer), the purpose (improve diagnosis in clinically affected vs. screening preclinical individuals), and the target population (mild cognitive impairment patients referring to memory clinics vs. general population) lead to important differences, influencing both the design of validation studies and the use of selected biomarkers. This framework is applied within a wider initiative to assess the current available evidence on the clinical validity of biomarkers for AD, for the final aim to identify gaps and research priorities, and to inform coordinated research efforts boosting AD biomarkers research.
KW - Alzheimer
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Dementia
KW - Early diagnosis
KW - Methodology
KW - Validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015637626&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015637626&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.01.021
DO - 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.01.021
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28317645
AN - SCOPUS:85015637626
SN - 0197-4580
VL - 52
SP - 141
EP - 152
JO - Neurobiology of Aging
JF - Neurobiology of Aging
ER -