The benefits and limitations of needle protectors and needleless intravenous systems

Robert Orenstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Needleless and needle protector intravenous systems have taken the place of 80% of needles used in IV therapy. Although these new systems are marketed as safe, many have not been widely tested and are not fail-safe. Each of the needleless IV systems and needle protector systems has limitations and potential benefit when applied in the appropriate circumstances. The benefits and limitations of these devices in today's healthcare market are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)122-128
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Intravenous Nursing
Volume22
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Needles
Health Care Sector
Equipment and Supplies
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

The benefits and limitations of needle protectors and needleless intravenous systems. / Orenstein, Robert.

In: Journal of Intravenous Nursing, Vol. 22, No. 3, 05.1999, p. 122-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{39e1781e341e486bbd266b87a671ff77,
title = "The benefits and limitations of needle protectors and needleless intravenous systems",
abstract = "Needleless and needle protector intravenous systems have taken the place of 80{\%} of needles used in IV therapy. Although these new systems are marketed as safe, many have not been widely tested and are not fail-safe. Each of the needleless IV systems and needle protector systems has limitations and potential benefit when applied in the appropriate circumstances. The benefits and limitations of these devices in today's healthcare market are discussed.",
author = "Robert Orenstein",
year = "1999",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "122--128",
journal = "Journal of Infusion Nursing",
issn = "1533-1458",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The benefits and limitations of needle protectors and needleless intravenous systems

AU - Orenstein, Robert

PY - 1999/5

Y1 - 1999/5

N2 - Needleless and needle protector intravenous systems have taken the place of 80% of needles used in IV therapy. Although these new systems are marketed as safe, many have not been widely tested and are not fail-safe. Each of the needleless IV systems and needle protector systems has limitations and potential benefit when applied in the appropriate circumstances. The benefits and limitations of these devices in today's healthcare market are discussed.

AB - Needleless and needle protector intravenous systems have taken the place of 80% of needles used in IV therapy. Although these new systems are marketed as safe, many have not been widely tested and are not fail-safe. Each of the needleless IV systems and needle protector systems has limitations and potential benefit when applied in the appropriate circumstances. The benefits and limitations of these devices in today's healthcare market are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033505942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033505942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10640075

AN - SCOPUS:0033505942

VL - 22

SP - 122

EP - 128

JO - Journal of Infusion Nursing

JF - Journal of Infusion Nursing

SN - 1533-1458

IS - 3

ER -