TY - JOUR
T1 - The Attitude of Practitioners Towards Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty
AU - Badurdeen, Dilhana
AU - Farha, Jad
AU - Fayad, Lea
AU - Abbarh, Shahem
AU - Singh, Gagandeep
AU - Jovani, Manol
AU - Hedjoudje, Abdellah
AU - Adam, Atif
AU - Alqahtani, Aayed
AU - Neto, Manoel G.
AU - Kumbhari, Vivek
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/10/1
Y1 - 2022/10/1
N2 - Background and Aim: Despite widespread adoption and encouraging results seen over the last 5 years, no consensus exists regarding the endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) technique, training, or preprocedure and postprocedure management of the patient. The aim of our survey was to assess practice trends and preferences of bariatric endoscopists with respect to ESG. Methods: Using a digital platform, we conducted a worldwide survey by emailing a link with an electronic questionnaire to 1200 bariatric endoscopists trained to perform endoscopic suturing using the Apollo Overstitch suturing device (Apollo Endosurgery). Results: We received 221 responses that were included in the analysis. Fifty-one responders (36.4%) required 1 to 10 procedures, and 37 (26.4%) needed 11 to 20 procedures to become proficient at ESG. Ninety-six (68.6%) stated that lower body mass index thresholds should be adopted for Asian and Arab patients. There was no consensus on the ideal number of sutures, with 45 (32.1%), 42 (30%), 36 (25.7%), 13 (9.3%), and 4 (2.9%) recommending 4 to 6, 5 to 7, 6 to 8, 7 to 9, and 8 to 12 sutures, respectively. The primary barriers to establishing an endobariatric program were the inability to establish a cash pay model, 77 (95.1%); lack of institutional support, 61 (75.3%); and difficulty in establishing an ambulatory surgical center/hospital to perform ESG, 73 (90.1%). Conclusions: ESG practice trends remain heterogenous among practitioners in regard to indication, technique, and preprocedure and postprocedure management. Specific ESG guidelines are warranted, and this survey will assist in providing the framework for these guidelines to be written.
AB - Background and Aim: Despite widespread adoption and encouraging results seen over the last 5 years, no consensus exists regarding the endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) technique, training, or preprocedure and postprocedure management of the patient. The aim of our survey was to assess practice trends and preferences of bariatric endoscopists with respect to ESG. Methods: Using a digital platform, we conducted a worldwide survey by emailing a link with an electronic questionnaire to 1200 bariatric endoscopists trained to perform endoscopic suturing using the Apollo Overstitch suturing device (Apollo Endosurgery). Results: We received 221 responses that were included in the analysis. Fifty-one responders (36.4%) required 1 to 10 procedures, and 37 (26.4%) needed 11 to 20 procedures to become proficient at ESG. Ninety-six (68.6%) stated that lower body mass index thresholds should be adopted for Asian and Arab patients. There was no consensus on the ideal number of sutures, with 45 (32.1%), 42 (30%), 36 (25.7%), 13 (9.3%), and 4 (2.9%) recommending 4 to 6, 5 to 7, 6 to 8, 7 to 9, and 8 to 12 sutures, respectively. The primary barriers to establishing an endobariatric program were the inability to establish a cash pay model, 77 (95.1%); lack of institutional support, 61 (75.3%); and difficulty in establishing an ambulatory surgical center/hospital to perform ESG, 73 (90.1%). Conclusions: ESG practice trends remain heterogenous among practitioners in regard to indication, technique, and preprocedure and postprocedure management. Specific ESG guidelines are warranted, and this survey will assist in providing the framework for these guidelines to be written.
KW - ESG guidelines
KW - ESG training
KW - Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137167257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85137167257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001615
DO - 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001615
M3 - Article
C2 - 34653069
AN - SCOPUS:85137167257
SN - 0192-0790
VL - 56
SP - 756
EP - 763
JO - Journal of clinical gastroenterology
JF - Journal of clinical gastroenterology
IS - 9
ER -