The 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, “Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Development of a Policy-relevant Patient-centered Research Agenda” Diagnostic Testing Breakout Session Report

Tyler W. Barrett, Kristin L. Rising, Fernanda Bellolio, M. Kennedy Hall, Aaron Brody, Kenneth W. Dodd, Mira Grieser, Phillip D. Levy, Ali S. Raja, Wesley H. Self, Gail Weingarten, Erik P. Hess, Judd E. Hollander, Timothy B. Jang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Diagnostic testing is an integral component of patient evaluation in the emergency department (ED). Emergency clinicians frequently use diagnostic testing to more confidently exclude “worst-case” diagnoses rather than to determine the most likely etiology for a presenting complaint. Increased utilization of diagnostic testing has not been associated with reductions in disease-related mortality but has led to increased overall healthcare costs and other unintended consequences (e.g., incidental findings requiring further workup, unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation or potentially nephrotoxic contrast). Shared decision making (SDM) presents an opportunity for clinicians to discuss the benefits and harms associated with diagnostic testing with patients to more closely tailor testing to patient risk. This article introduces the challenges and opportunities associated with incorporating SDM into emergency care by summarizing the conclusions of the diagnostic testing group at the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on SDM. Three primary domains emerged: 1) characteristics of a condition or test appropriate for SDM, 2) critical elements of and potential barriers to SDM discussions on diagnostic testing, and 3) financial aspects of SDM applied to diagnostic testing. The most critical research questions to improve engagement of patients in their acute care diagnostic decisions were determined by consensus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1354-1361
Number of pages8
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume23
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Emergency Medicine
Policy Making
Hospital Emergency Service
Consensus
Decision Making
Research
Patient Participation
Incidental Findings
Emergency Medical Services
Ionizing Radiation
Health Care Costs
Emergencies
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

The 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, “Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department : Development of a Policy-relevant Patient-centered Research Agenda” Diagnostic Testing Breakout Session Report. / Barrett, Tyler W.; Rising, Kristin L.; Bellolio, Fernanda; Hall, M. Kennedy; Brody, Aaron; Dodd, Kenneth W.; Grieser, Mira; Levy, Phillip D.; Raja, Ali S.; Self, Wesley H.; Weingarten, Gail; Hess, Erik P.; Hollander, Judd E.; Jang, Timothy B.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 12, 01.12.2016, p. 1354-1361.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barrett, Tyler W. ; Rising, Kristin L. ; Bellolio, Fernanda ; Hall, M. Kennedy ; Brody, Aaron ; Dodd, Kenneth W. ; Grieser, Mira ; Levy, Phillip D. ; Raja, Ali S. ; Self, Wesley H. ; Weingarten, Gail ; Hess, Erik P. ; Hollander, Judd E. ; Jang, Timothy B. / The 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, “Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department : Development of a Policy-relevant Patient-centered Research Agenda” Diagnostic Testing Breakout Session Report. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 23, No. 12. pp. 1354-1361.
@article{245762b0af7541279ab1d1aca1f6a341,
title = "The 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, “Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Development of a Policy-relevant Patient-centered Research Agenda” Diagnostic Testing Breakout Session Report",
abstract = "Diagnostic testing is an integral component of patient evaluation in the emergency department (ED). Emergency clinicians frequently use diagnostic testing to more confidently exclude “worst-case” diagnoses rather than to determine the most likely etiology for a presenting complaint. Increased utilization of diagnostic testing has not been associated with reductions in disease-related mortality but has led to increased overall healthcare costs and other unintended consequences (e.g., incidental findings requiring further workup, unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation or potentially nephrotoxic contrast). Shared decision making (SDM) presents an opportunity for clinicians to discuss the benefits and harms associated with diagnostic testing with patients to more closely tailor testing to patient risk. This article introduces the challenges and opportunities associated with incorporating SDM into emergency care by summarizing the conclusions of the diagnostic testing group at the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on SDM. Three primary domains emerged: 1) characteristics of a condition or test appropriate for SDM, 2) critical elements of and potential barriers to SDM discussions on diagnostic testing, and 3) financial aspects of SDM applied to diagnostic testing. The most critical research questions to improve engagement of patients in their acute care diagnostic decisions were determined by consensus.",
author = "Barrett, {Tyler W.} and Rising, {Kristin L.} and Fernanda Bellolio and Hall, {M. Kennedy} and Aaron Brody and Dodd, {Kenneth W.} and Mira Grieser and Levy, {Phillip D.} and Raja, {Ali S.} and Self, {Wesley H.} and Gail Weingarten and Hess, {Erik P.} and Hollander, {Judd E.} and Jang, {Timothy B.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/acem.13050",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "1354--1361",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, “Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department

T2 - Development of a Policy-relevant Patient-centered Research Agenda” Diagnostic Testing Breakout Session Report

AU - Barrett, Tyler W.

AU - Rising, Kristin L.

AU - Bellolio, Fernanda

AU - Hall, M. Kennedy

AU - Brody, Aaron

AU - Dodd, Kenneth W.

AU - Grieser, Mira

AU - Levy, Phillip D.

AU - Raja, Ali S.

AU - Self, Wesley H.

AU - Weingarten, Gail

AU - Hess, Erik P.

AU - Hollander, Judd E.

AU - Jang, Timothy B.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Diagnostic testing is an integral component of patient evaluation in the emergency department (ED). Emergency clinicians frequently use diagnostic testing to more confidently exclude “worst-case” diagnoses rather than to determine the most likely etiology for a presenting complaint. Increased utilization of diagnostic testing has not been associated with reductions in disease-related mortality but has led to increased overall healthcare costs and other unintended consequences (e.g., incidental findings requiring further workup, unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation or potentially nephrotoxic contrast). Shared decision making (SDM) presents an opportunity for clinicians to discuss the benefits and harms associated with diagnostic testing with patients to more closely tailor testing to patient risk. This article introduces the challenges and opportunities associated with incorporating SDM into emergency care by summarizing the conclusions of the diagnostic testing group at the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on SDM. Three primary domains emerged: 1) characteristics of a condition or test appropriate for SDM, 2) critical elements of and potential barriers to SDM discussions on diagnostic testing, and 3) financial aspects of SDM applied to diagnostic testing. The most critical research questions to improve engagement of patients in their acute care diagnostic decisions were determined by consensus.

AB - Diagnostic testing is an integral component of patient evaluation in the emergency department (ED). Emergency clinicians frequently use diagnostic testing to more confidently exclude “worst-case” diagnoses rather than to determine the most likely etiology for a presenting complaint. Increased utilization of diagnostic testing has not been associated with reductions in disease-related mortality but has led to increased overall healthcare costs and other unintended consequences (e.g., incidental findings requiring further workup, unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation or potentially nephrotoxic contrast). Shared decision making (SDM) presents an opportunity for clinicians to discuss the benefits and harms associated with diagnostic testing with patients to more closely tailor testing to patient risk. This article introduces the challenges and opportunities associated with incorporating SDM into emergency care by summarizing the conclusions of the diagnostic testing group at the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on SDM. Three primary domains emerged: 1) characteristics of a condition or test appropriate for SDM, 2) critical elements of and potential barriers to SDM discussions on diagnostic testing, and 3) financial aspects of SDM applied to diagnostic testing. The most critical research questions to improve engagement of patients in their acute care diagnostic decisions were determined by consensus.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002342218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85002342218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/acem.13050

DO - 10.1111/acem.13050

M3 - Article

C2 - 27404959

AN - SCOPUS:85002342218

VL - 23

SP - 1354

EP - 1361

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 12

ER -