TH‐A‐116‐07: Validation of Patient Contours for Head and Neck Treatments Using Population‐Based Metrics

J. Kavanaugh, H. Wooten, o. Pechenaya Green, Todd DeWees, H. li, S. Mutic, M. Altman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a statistical and anatomical population‐based model that can be used to validate the accuracy and integrity of head and neck normal tissue structures of individual patients for use in preplanning and/or online adaptive radiation therapy. Methods: Normal tissue contours from 29 patients treated for head and neck cancers were used in development of the model. For each patient, DICOM plan and structure files were exported from the treatment planning system to an in‐house developed software program which calculated anatomic metrics for volume, shape, and intra‐structure distances for all structures. A statistical analysis of these metrics produced population specific rules that were used within the software program to evaluate the accuracy of head and neck contours for subsequent patients. The contour assessment program included only metrics for which the standard deviation was less than a heuristically determined limit of 15% of the mean for that metric. To verify the softwares utility, 42 common contouring errors were intentionally introduced within 9 specific structures for 9 different patients. These errors included incorrect laterality, position, size and shape, inclusion of small isolated pixels, deleted segments, and empty structures. The evaluation of all 9 head and neck structure sets was blinded to the nature and number of the generated errors. Results: The contour accuracy and integrity program correctly identified 40 of 42 generated errors. Small modifications to the structures shape and volume were the most difficult to correctly identify; however the program correctly identified all positional and laterality errors, deleted/isolated segments, small pixels, and deleted contours. Conclusion: Rules developed from a statistical analysis of anatomic population‐based metrics can provide much of the necessary information to correctly and efficiently evaluate the accuracy and integrity of a unique patient contour structure set for IMRT preplanning or for an online adaptive radiation therapy protocol.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neck
Head
Software
Radiotherapy
Therapeutics
Anatomic Models
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

TH‐A‐116‐07 : Validation of Patient Contours for Head and Neck Treatments Using Population‐Based Metrics. / Kavanaugh, J.; Wooten, H.; Green, o. Pechenaya; DeWees, Todd; li, H.; Mutic, S.; Altman, M.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 40, No. 6, 01.01.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kavanaugh, J. ; Wooten, H. ; Green, o. Pechenaya ; DeWees, Todd ; li, H. ; Mutic, S. ; Altman, M. / TH‐A‐116‐07 : Validation of Patient Contours for Head and Neck Treatments Using Population‐Based Metrics. In: Medical Physics. 2013 ; Vol. 40, No. 6.
@article{b0345bb55d7242c2a52752dfe5a8b210,
title = "TH‐A‐116‐07: Validation of Patient Contours for Head and Neck Treatments Using Population‐Based Metrics",
abstract = "Purpose: To develop a statistical and anatomical population‐based model that can be used to validate the accuracy and integrity of head and neck normal tissue structures of individual patients for use in preplanning and/or online adaptive radiation therapy. Methods: Normal tissue contours from 29 patients treated for head and neck cancers were used in development of the model. For each patient, DICOM plan and structure files were exported from the treatment planning system to an in‐house developed software program which calculated anatomic metrics for volume, shape, and intra‐structure distances for all structures. A statistical analysis of these metrics produced population specific rules that were used within the software program to evaluate the accuracy of head and neck contours for subsequent patients. The contour assessment program included only metrics for which the standard deviation was less than a heuristically determined limit of 15{\%} of the mean for that metric. To verify the softwares utility, 42 common contouring errors were intentionally introduced within 9 specific structures for 9 different patients. These errors included incorrect laterality, position, size and shape, inclusion of small isolated pixels, deleted segments, and empty structures. The evaluation of all 9 head and neck structure sets was blinded to the nature and number of the generated errors. Results: The contour accuracy and integrity program correctly identified 40 of 42 generated errors. Small modifications to the structures shape and volume were the most difficult to correctly identify; however the program correctly identified all positional and laterality errors, deleted/isolated segments, small pixels, and deleted contours. Conclusion: Rules developed from a statistical analysis of anatomic population‐based metrics can provide much of the necessary information to correctly and efficiently evaluate the accuracy and integrity of a unique patient contour structure set for IMRT preplanning or for an online adaptive radiation therapy protocol.",
author = "J. Kavanaugh and H. Wooten and Green, {o. Pechenaya} and Todd DeWees and H. li and S. Mutic and M. Altman",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.4815736",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - TH‐A‐116‐07

T2 - Validation of Patient Contours for Head and Neck Treatments Using Population‐Based Metrics

AU - Kavanaugh, J.

AU - Wooten, H.

AU - Green, o. Pechenaya

AU - DeWees, Todd

AU - li, H.

AU - Mutic, S.

AU - Altman, M.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To develop a statistical and anatomical population‐based model that can be used to validate the accuracy and integrity of head and neck normal tissue structures of individual patients for use in preplanning and/or online adaptive radiation therapy. Methods: Normal tissue contours from 29 patients treated for head and neck cancers were used in development of the model. For each patient, DICOM plan and structure files were exported from the treatment planning system to an in‐house developed software program which calculated anatomic metrics for volume, shape, and intra‐structure distances for all structures. A statistical analysis of these metrics produced population specific rules that were used within the software program to evaluate the accuracy of head and neck contours for subsequent patients. The contour assessment program included only metrics for which the standard deviation was less than a heuristically determined limit of 15% of the mean for that metric. To verify the softwares utility, 42 common contouring errors were intentionally introduced within 9 specific structures for 9 different patients. These errors included incorrect laterality, position, size and shape, inclusion of small isolated pixels, deleted segments, and empty structures. The evaluation of all 9 head and neck structure sets was blinded to the nature and number of the generated errors. Results: The contour accuracy and integrity program correctly identified 40 of 42 generated errors. Small modifications to the structures shape and volume were the most difficult to correctly identify; however the program correctly identified all positional and laterality errors, deleted/isolated segments, small pixels, and deleted contours. Conclusion: Rules developed from a statistical analysis of anatomic population‐based metrics can provide much of the necessary information to correctly and efficiently evaluate the accuracy and integrity of a unique patient contour structure set for IMRT preplanning or for an online adaptive radiation therapy protocol.

AB - Purpose: To develop a statistical and anatomical population‐based model that can be used to validate the accuracy and integrity of head and neck normal tissue structures of individual patients for use in preplanning and/or online adaptive radiation therapy. Methods: Normal tissue contours from 29 patients treated for head and neck cancers were used in development of the model. For each patient, DICOM plan and structure files were exported from the treatment planning system to an in‐house developed software program which calculated anatomic metrics for volume, shape, and intra‐structure distances for all structures. A statistical analysis of these metrics produced population specific rules that were used within the software program to evaluate the accuracy of head and neck contours for subsequent patients. The contour assessment program included only metrics for which the standard deviation was less than a heuristically determined limit of 15% of the mean for that metric. To verify the softwares utility, 42 common contouring errors were intentionally introduced within 9 specific structures for 9 different patients. These errors included incorrect laterality, position, size and shape, inclusion of small isolated pixels, deleted segments, and empty structures. The evaluation of all 9 head and neck structure sets was blinded to the nature and number of the generated errors. Results: The contour accuracy and integrity program correctly identified 40 of 42 generated errors. Small modifications to the structures shape and volume were the most difficult to correctly identify; however the program correctly identified all positional and laterality errors, deleted/isolated segments, small pixels, and deleted contours. Conclusion: Rules developed from a statistical analysis of anatomic population‐based metrics can provide much of the necessary information to correctly and efficiently evaluate the accuracy and integrity of a unique patient contour structure set for IMRT preplanning or for an online adaptive radiation therapy protocol.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923342211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923342211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4815736

DO - 10.1118/1.4815736

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84923342211

VL - 40

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -