TY - JOUR
T1 - Teaching Systems Improvement to Early Medical Students
T2 - Strategies and Lessons Learned
AU - Harbell, Monica W.
AU - Li, Descartes
AU - Boscardin, Christy
AU - Pierluissi, Edgar
AU - Hauer, Karen E.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Anna Chang, MD, clinical microsystems clerkship (CMC) director, and the University of California, San Francisco, CMC team, for their support and feedback in conducting this research project, and Victoria Ruddick for her assistance in designing Figure 1.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 by the Association of American Medical Colleges.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Purpose Despite increasing emphasis in medical school education on quality and systems improvement, many medical schools lack sufficient faculty with expertise to teach systems improvement. Using the pedagogical content knowledge framework, this study explores how faculty engage students in systems improvement work and faculty perceptions of the outcomes for the health system and students. Method In May-June 2017, the authors interviewed 12 of 13 invited faculty with experience in teaching and engaging first-year medical students in systems improvement work, the course of students' systems improvement work over time, the impact of students' projects on health systems, and students' learning and attitudes about systems improvement. The authors conducted qualitative analysis iteratively with data collection to sufficiency. Results Six emergent themes characterized faculty's approach to guiding students in systems improvement work: faculty-student relationship, faculty role, student role, faculty-student shared responsibility for projects, faculty and student content knowledge, and project outcomes. The faculty-student relationship was foundational for successful systems improvement work. Faculty roles included project selection, project management, and health systems interactions. Students engaged in systems improvement as their faculty leveraged their knowledge and skills and created meaningful student roles. Faculty and students shared responsibility and colearned systems improvement content knowledge. Faculty defined successful outcomes as students' learning about the systems improvement process and interprofessional collaboration. Conclusions Findings highlight the critical importance of pedagogical content knowledge to engage early learners in systems improvement work, understand their learning interests and needs, and manage their projects longitudinally.
AB - Purpose Despite increasing emphasis in medical school education on quality and systems improvement, many medical schools lack sufficient faculty with expertise to teach systems improvement. Using the pedagogical content knowledge framework, this study explores how faculty engage students in systems improvement work and faculty perceptions of the outcomes for the health system and students. Method In May-June 2017, the authors interviewed 12 of 13 invited faculty with experience in teaching and engaging first-year medical students in systems improvement work, the course of students' systems improvement work over time, the impact of students' projects on health systems, and students' learning and attitudes about systems improvement. The authors conducted qualitative analysis iteratively with data collection to sufficiency. Results Six emergent themes characterized faculty's approach to guiding students in systems improvement work: faculty-student relationship, faculty role, student role, faculty-student shared responsibility for projects, faculty and student content knowledge, and project outcomes. The faculty-student relationship was foundational for successful systems improvement work. Faculty roles included project selection, project management, and health systems interactions. Students engaged in systems improvement as their faculty leveraged their knowledge and skills and created meaningful student roles. Faculty and students shared responsibility and colearned systems improvement content knowledge. Faculty defined successful outcomes as students' learning about the systems improvement process and interprofessional collaboration. Conclusions Findings highlight the critical importance of pedagogical content knowledge to engage early learners in systems improvement work, understand their learning interests and needs, and manage their projects longitudinally.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077016467&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077016467&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002886
DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002886
M3 - Article
C2 - 31335811
AN - SCOPUS:85077016467
SN - 1040-2446
VL - 95
SP - 136
EP - 144
JO - Academic Medicine
JF - Academic Medicine
IS - 1
ER -