Systemic mastocytosis in 342 consecutive adults: Survival studies and prognostic factors

Ken Hong Lim, Ayalew Tefferi, Terra L. Lasho, Christy Finke, Mrinal Patnaik, Joseph H. Butterfield, Rebecca F. McClure, Chin Yang Li, Animesh Pardanani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

328 Scopus citations

Abstract

Clinical phenotype in systemic mastocytosis (SM) is markedly variable, which complicates prognostication and decision making regarding the choice and timing of therapy. In a retrospective study of 342 consecutive adult patients with SM seen at the Mayo Clinic between 1976 and 2007, disease subdesignation according to the World Health Organization (WHO) proposal was indolent (ISM) in 159 (46%), with associated clonal hematologic non-mast cell lineage disease (SM-AHNMD) in 138 (40%), aggressive (ASM) in 41 (12%), and mast cell leukemia in 4 (1%). KITD816V was detected in bone marrow-derived DNA by allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 68% of 165 patients evaluated (ISM, 78%; ASM, 82%; SM-AHNMD, 60%; P = .03); JAK2V617F was detected in 4%, all in SM-AHNMD. Compared with those with nonindolent SM, life expectancy in ISM was superior and not significantly different from that of the age- and sex-matched US population. In addition, multivariable analysis identified advanced age, weight loss, anemia, thrombocytopenia, hypoalbuminemia, and excess bone marrow blasts as independent adverse prognostic factors for survival. The current study validates the prognostic relevance of the WHO subclassification of SM and provides additional information of value in terms of both risk stratification and interpretation of clinical presentation and laboratory results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5727-5736
Number of pages10
JournalBlood
Volume113
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Immunology
  • Hematology
  • Cell Biology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Systemic mastocytosis in 342 consecutive adults: Survival studies and prognostic factors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this