Systematically reviewing qualitative studies complements survey design: An exploratory study of barriers to paediatric immunisations

Edward J. Mills, Victor Manuel Montori, Cory P. Ross, Beverly Shea, Kumanan Wilson, Gordon H. Guyatt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Designing survey questions requires content expertise, awareness of previous qualitative literature, and piloting. We examined surveys addressing parental barriers to vaccinating children to determine if they comprehensively included themes identified in published qualitative studies. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search of 12 electronic databases and compared questions asked in eligible surveys identified to issues raised in qualitative studies. Issues included nine themes related to harm, six related to distrust, eight to issues of access, and three other issues. Results: The 29 eligible surveys failed to adequately address several important themes identified in qualitative studies. The number that failed to address the following themes were as follows: beliefs that vaccines cause diseases (n = 26); painful (n = 25); distrust of medical community (n = 28); communication problems with staff (n = 25); memories of their own or others adverse experiences (n = 28); fear of long-term effects (n = 26); belief the medical community does not understand adverse events associated with vaccines (n = 28); and parent's own lack of knowledge about diseases (n = 29). Conclusions: Many surveys of parental barriers to immunization failed to address a number of important themes identified in qualitative studies. To the extent this is true in other areas, ensuring that investigators have conducted an adequate number and variety of qualitative studies, and systematically reviewing those studies, will improve surveys' content validity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1101-1108
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume58
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2005

Fingerprint

Immunization
Pediatrics
Vaccines
Fear
Surveys and Questionnaires
Parents
Communication
Research Personnel
Databases

Keywords

  • Immunization
  • Qualitative
  • Surveys
  • Systematic reviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Systematically reviewing qualitative studies complements survey design : An exploratory study of barriers to paediatric immunisations. / Mills, Edward J.; Montori, Victor Manuel; Ross, Cory P.; Shea, Beverly; Wilson, Kumanan; Guyatt, Gordon H.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 58, No. 11, 11.2005, p. 1101-1108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mills, Edward J. ; Montori, Victor Manuel ; Ross, Cory P. ; Shea, Beverly ; Wilson, Kumanan ; Guyatt, Gordon H. / Systematically reviewing qualitative studies complements survey design : An exploratory study of barriers to paediatric immunisations. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2005 ; Vol. 58, No. 11. pp. 1101-1108.
@article{e169f630f964406d904604be06a15614,
title = "Systematically reviewing qualitative studies complements survey design: An exploratory study of barriers to paediatric immunisations",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: Designing survey questions requires content expertise, awareness of previous qualitative literature, and piloting. We examined surveys addressing parental barriers to vaccinating children to determine if they comprehensively included themes identified in published qualitative studies. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search of 12 electronic databases and compared questions asked in eligible surveys identified to issues raised in qualitative studies. Issues included nine themes related to harm, six related to distrust, eight to issues of access, and three other issues. Results: The 29 eligible surveys failed to adequately address several important themes identified in qualitative studies. The number that failed to address the following themes were as follows: beliefs that vaccines cause diseases (n = 26); painful (n = 25); distrust of medical community (n = 28); communication problems with staff (n = 25); memories of their own or others adverse experiences (n = 28); fear of long-term effects (n = 26); belief the medical community does not understand adverse events associated with vaccines (n = 28); and parent's own lack of knowledge about diseases (n = 29). Conclusions: Many surveys of parental barriers to immunization failed to address a number of important themes identified in qualitative studies. To the extent this is true in other areas, ensuring that investigators have conducted an adequate number and variety of qualitative studies, and systematically reviewing those studies, will improve surveys' content validity.",
keywords = "Immunization, Qualitative, Surveys, Systematic reviews",
author = "Mills, {Edward J.} and Montori, {Victor Manuel} and Ross, {Cory P.} and Beverly Shea and Kumanan Wilson and Guyatt, {Gordon H.}",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "1101--1108",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematically reviewing qualitative studies complements survey design

T2 - An exploratory study of barriers to paediatric immunisations

AU - Mills, Edward J.

AU - Montori, Victor Manuel

AU - Ross, Cory P.

AU - Shea, Beverly

AU - Wilson, Kumanan

AU - Guyatt, Gordon H.

PY - 2005/11

Y1 - 2005/11

N2 - Background and Objectives: Designing survey questions requires content expertise, awareness of previous qualitative literature, and piloting. We examined surveys addressing parental barriers to vaccinating children to determine if they comprehensively included themes identified in published qualitative studies. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search of 12 electronic databases and compared questions asked in eligible surveys identified to issues raised in qualitative studies. Issues included nine themes related to harm, six related to distrust, eight to issues of access, and three other issues. Results: The 29 eligible surveys failed to adequately address several important themes identified in qualitative studies. The number that failed to address the following themes were as follows: beliefs that vaccines cause diseases (n = 26); painful (n = 25); distrust of medical community (n = 28); communication problems with staff (n = 25); memories of their own or others adverse experiences (n = 28); fear of long-term effects (n = 26); belief the medical community does not understand adverse events associated with vaccines (n = 28); and parent's own lack of knowledge about diseases (n = 29). Conclusions: Many surveys of parental barriers to immunization failed to address a number of important themes identified in qualitative studies. To the extent this is true in other areas, ensuring that investigators have conducted an adequate number and variety of qualitative studies, and systematically reviewing those studies, will improve surveys' content validity.

AB - Background and Objectives: Designing survey questions requires content expertise, awareness of previous qualitative literature, and piloting. We examined surveys addressing parental barriers to vaccinating children to determine if they comprehensively included themes identified in published qualitative studies. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search of 12 electronic databases and compared questions asked in eligible surveys identified to issues raised in qualitative studies. Issues included nine themes related to harm, six related to distrust, eight to issues of access, and three other issues. Results: The 29 eligible surveys failed to adequately address several important themes identified in qualitative studies. The number that failed to address the following themes were as follows: beliefs that vaccines cause diseases (n = 26); painful (n = 25); distrust of medical community (n = 28); communication problems with staff (n = 25); memories of their own or others adverse experiences (n = 28); fear of long-term effects (n = 26); belief the medical community does not understand adverse events associated with vaccines (n = 28); and parent's own lack of knowledge about diseases (n = 29). Conclusions: Many surveys of parental barriers to immunization failed to address a number of important themes identified in qualitative studies. To the extent this is true in other areas, ensuring that investigators have conducted an adequate number and variety of qualitative studies, and systematically reviewing those studies, will improve surveys' content validity.

KW - Immunization

KW - Qualitative

KW - Surveys

KW - Systematic reviews

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=26644451628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=26644451628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 16223652

AN - SCOPUS:26644451628

VL - 58

SP - 1101

EP - 1108

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 11

ER -