Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids

Andrew W. Gorlin, David M. Rosenfeld, Jillian Maloney, Christopher S. Wie, Johnathan McGarvey, Terrence L. Trentman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

The conversion of high-dose intravenous (IV) opioids to an equianalgesic epidural (EP) or intrathecal (IT) dose is a common clinical dilemma for which there is little evidence to guide practice. Expert opinion varies, though a 100 IV:10:EP:1 IT conversion ratio is commonly cited in the literature, especially for morphine. In this study, the authors surveyed 724 pain specialists to elucidate the ratios that respondents apply to convert high-dose IV morphine, hydromorphone, and fentanyl to both EP and IT routes. Eighty-three respondents completed the survey. Conversion ratios were calculated and entered into graphical scatter plots. The data suggest that there is wide variation in how pain specialists convert high-dose IV opioids to EP and IT routes. The 100 IV:10 EP:1 IT ratio was the most common answer of survey respondent, especially for morphine, though also for hydromorphone and fentanyl. Furthermore, more respondents applied a more aggressive conversion strategy for hydromorphone and fentanyl, likely reflecting less spinal selectivity of those opioids compared with morphine. The authors conclude that there is little consensus on this issue and suggest that in the absence of better data, a conservative approach to opioid conversion between IV and neuraxial routes is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)693-700
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Pain Research
Volume9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 21 2016

Keywords

  • Cancer pain
  • Epidural
  • Intrathecal pump

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Survey of pain specialists regarding conversion of high-dose intravenous to neuraxial opioids'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this