Survey of hand surgeons regarding their perceived needs for an expanded upper extremity fellowship

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To survey practicing hand surgeons regarding their perceived need for an expanded upper extremity fellowship. Methods: Electronic surveys were sent to 248 surgeons who had completed a hand surgery fellowship between 2008 and 2010. The survey was structured to ascertain whether there was a need for expanded education encompassing the entire upper extremity. Four separate mailings were made. Of the 248 surgeons who were sent the survey, 131 (53%) responded. Of the respondents, 74% (97) were trained in orthopedics, 16% (21) in plastic surgery, and 10% (13) in general surgery. Results: Of the 131 respondents, 7% (9) felt that 1 year of specialty training was insufficient, 48% (63) had sought shoulder and elbow training in their fellowship, and 52% (68) did not have dedicated plastic surgery rotations. Microsurgical experience was variable: 8% (10) of respondents had not been exposed to replantation, 23% (30) had not been exposed to free flap surgery, 32% (42) had not participated in brachial plexus surgery, and 17% (22) had not done a vascularized bone graft. Fifty-six percent (73) of respondents had not had dedicated time for research during their fellowship. Eleven percent (15) had obtained additional training after their fellowship, including shoulder and elbow, microsurgery, pediatrics, and peripheral nerve surgery. When asked if they would have applied to a 2-year hand and upper extremity fellowship, 60% (79) of respondents would have applied. Conclusions: Based on the results of this survey, 1 year of hand fellowship training has been perceived as inadequate by 7% (9) of respondents, with exposure insufficient in shoulder and elbow, microsurgery, pediatrics, and clinical research. Further critical review of hand fellowship education should be considered, with the availability of extended fellowship tracks for those requesting an increased breadth of upper extremity surgical training. Type of study/level of evidence: Economic/Decision Analysis II.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2374-2380
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Hand Surgery
Volume37
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

Upper Extremity
Hand
Elbow
Microsurgery
Plastic Surgery
Surgeons
Surveys and Questionnaires
Pediatrics
Education
Decision Support Techniques
Brachial Plexus
Free Tissue Flaps
Replantation
Peripheral Nerves
Research
Orthopedics
Economics
Transplants
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • Fellowship education
  • general surgery
  • hand and upper extremity training
  • orthopedic
  • plastic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Survey of hand surgeons regarding their perceived needs for an expanded upper extremity fellowship. / Kakar, Sanjeev; Bakri, K.; Shin, Alexander Yong-Shik.

In: Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 37, No. 11, 11.2012, p. 2374-2380.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f8ec7c8156a74b3c9a4f01d01e07ca15,
title = "Survey of hand surgeons regarding their perceived needs for an expanded upper extremity fellowship",
abstract = "Purpose: To survey practicing hand surgeons regarding their perceived need for an expanded upper extremity fellowship. Methods: Electronic surveys were sent to 248 surgeons who had completed a hand surgery fellowship between 2008 and 2010. The survey was structured to ascertain whether there was a need for expanded education encompassing the entire upper extremity. Four separate mailings were made. Of the 248 surgeons who were sent the survey, 131 (53{\%}) responded. Of the respondents, 74{\%} (97) were trained in orthopedics, 16{\%} (21) in plastic surgery, and 10{\%} (13) in general surgery. Results: Of the 131 respondents, 7{\%} (9) felt that 1 year of specialty training was insufficient, 48{\%} (63) had sought shoulder and elbow training in their fellowship, and 52{\%} (68) did not have dedicated plastic surgery rotations. Microsurgical experience was variable: 8{\%} (10) of respondents had not been exposed to replantation, 23{\%} (30) had not been exposed to free flap surgery, 32{\%} (42) had not participated in brachial plexus surgery, and 17{\%} (22) had not done a vascularized bone graft. Fifty-six percent (73) of respondents had not had dedicated time for research during their fellowship. Eleven percent (15) had obtained additional training after their fellowship, including shoulder and elbow, microsurgery, pediatrics, and peripheral nerve surgery. When asked if they would have applied to a 2-year hand and upper extremity fellowship, 60{\%} (79) of respondents would have applied. Conclusions: Based on the results of this survey, 1 year of hand fellowship training has been perceived as inadequate by 7{\%} (9) of respondents, with exposure insufficient in shoulder and elbow, microsurgery, pediatrics, and clinical research. Further critical review of hand fellowship education should be considered, with the availability of extended fellowship tracks for those requesting an increased breadth of upper extremity surgical training. Type of study/level of evidence: Economic/Decision Analysis II.",
keywords = "Fellowship education, general surgery, hand and upper extremity training, orthopedic, plastic",
author = "Sanjeev Kakar and K. Bakri and Shin, {Alexander Yong-Shik}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.08.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "2374--2380",
journal = "Journal of Hand Surgery",
issn = "0266-7681",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Survey of hand surgeons regarding their perceived needs for an expanded upper extremity fellowship

AU - Kakar, Sanjeev

AU - Bakri, K.

AU - Shin, Alexander Yong-Shik

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Purpose: To survey practicing hand surgeons regarding their perceived need for an expanded upper extremity fellowship. Methods: Electronic surveys were sent to 248 surgeons who had completed a hand surgery fellowship between 2008 and 2010. The survey was structured to ascertain whether there was a need for expanded education encompassing the entire upper extremity. Four separate mailings were made. Of the 248 surgeons who were sent the survey, 131 (53%) responded. Of the respondents, 74% (97) were trained in orthopedics, 16% (21) in plastic surgery, and 10% (13) in general surgery. Results: Of the 131 respondents, 7% (9) felt that 1 year of specialty training was insufficient, 48% (63) had sought shoulder and elbow training in their fellowship, and 52% (68) did not have dedicated plastic surgery rotations. Microsurgical experience was variable: 8% (10) of respondents had not been exposed to replantation, 23% (30) had not been exposed to free flap surgery, 32% (42) had not participated in brachial plexus surgery, and 17% (22) had not done a vascularized bone graft. Fifty-six percent (73) of respondents had not had dedicated time for research during their fellowship. Eleven percent (15) had obtained additional training after their fellowship, including shoulder and elbow, microsurgery, pediatrics, and peripheral nerve surgery. When asked if they would have applied to a 2-year hand and upper extremity fellowship, 60% (79) of respondents would have applied. Conclusions: Based on the results of this survey, 1 year of hand fellowship training has been perceived as inadequate by 7% (9) of respondents, with exposure insufficient in shoulder and elbow, microsurgery, pediatrics, and clinical research. Further critical review of hand fellowship education should be considered, with the availability of extended fellowship tracks for those requesting an increased breadth of upper extremity surgical training. Type of study/level of evidence: Economic/Decision Analysis II.

AB - Purpose: To survey practicing hand surgeons regarding their perceived need for an expanded upper extremity fellowship. Methods: Electronic surveys were sent to 248 surgeons who had completed a hand surgery fellowship between 2008 and 2010. The survey was structured to ascertain whether there was a need for expanded education encompassing the entire upper extremity. Four separate mailings were made. Of the 248 surgeons who were sent the survey, 131 (53%) responded. Of the respondents, 74% (97) were trained in orthopedics, 16% (21) in plastic surgery, and 10% (13) in general surgery. Results: Of the 131 respondents, 7% (9) felt that 1 year of specialty training was insufficient, 48% (63) had sought shoulder and elbow training in their fellowship, and 52% (68) did not have dedicated plastic surgery rotations. Microsurgical experience was variable: 8% (10) of respondents had not been exposed to replantation, 23% (30) had not been exposed to free flap surgery, 32% (42) had not participated in brachial plexus surgery, and 17% (22) had not done a vascularized bone graft. Fifty-six percent (73) of respondents had not had dedicated time for research during their fellowship. Eleven percent (15) had obtained additional training after their fellowship, including shoulder and elbow, microsurgery, pediatrics, and peripheral nerve surgery. When asked if they would have applied to a 2-year hand and upper extremity fellowship, 60% (79) of respondents would have applied. Conclusions: Based on the results of this survey, 1 year of hand fellowship training has been perceived as inadequate by 7% (9) of respondents, with exposure insufficient in shoulder and elbow, microsurgery, pediatrics, and clinical research. Further critical review of hand fellowship education should be considered, with the availability of extended fellowship tracks for those requesting an increased breadth of upper extremity surgical training. Type of study/level of evidence: Economic/Decision Analysis II.

KW - Fellowship education

KW - general surgery

KW - hand and upper extremity training

KW - orthopedic

KW - plastic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867884000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867884000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.08.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.08.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 23101535

AN - SCOPUS:84867884000

VL - 37

SP - 2374

EP - 2380

JO - Journal of Hand Surgery

JF - Journal of Hand Surgery

SN - 0266-7681

IS - 11

ER -