Surveillance after colorectal cancer resection

A systematic review

Bilgi Baca, Robert W. Beart, David A. Etzioni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surveillance programs are widely accepted as an integral part of the treatment plan provided to patients after surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. Despite an enormous amount of research performed regarding these programs, there is still uncertainty regarding what is appropriate surveillance. OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically review recent literature regarding outcomes achieved with different types of surveillance programs for patients with surgically treated colorectal cancer. DATA SOURCES: A search of the PubMed database was performed to identify studies published in the English language between January 2000 and January 2010. STUDY SELECTION: We included 2 types of studies in our systematic review: first, comparative studies where 2 or more surveillance strategies were applied and outcomes compared; second, single-cohort studies where the outcomes of a single surveillance strategy were reported. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cancer-related outcomes included survival, recurrence detection rate, and the ability of a recurrence to be resected with curative intent. RESULTS: Our review found 15 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Of these, 9 were comparative (4 randomized trials) and 6 were single-cohort studies. One study reported a better survival rate among patients who received more intensive follow-up. The vast majority of recurrences occurred within 3 years. LIMITATIONS: Our review found that the recent literature regarding the efficacy of surveillance is inconclusive, largely because of the small sample sizes and the heterogeneity in the surveillance programs and outcomes reported. CONCLUSIONS: Future randomized trials need to focus on larger sample sizes, and experimental designs should isolate specific elements of surveillance to better understand how each element contributes to improvements in patient outcomes. Risk stratification and duration of surveillance are key elements of surveillance strategies that also deserve focused investigation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1036-1048
Number of pages13
JournalDiseases of the Colon and Rectum
Volume54
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Colorectal Neoplasms
Recurrence
Sample Size
Cohort Studies
Aptitude
PubMed
Uncertainty
Research Design
Language
Survival Rate
Databases
Survival
Therapeutics
Research
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Colon cancer
  • Quality of care
  • Surveillance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Surveillance after colorectal cancer resection : A systematic review. / Baca, Bilgi; Beart, Robert W.; Etzioni, David A.

In: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, Vol. 54, No. 8, 08.2011, p. 1036-1048.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baca, Bilgi ; Beart, Robert W. ; Etzioni, David A. / Surveillance after colorectal cancer resection : A systematic review. In: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2011 ; Vol. 54, No. 8. pp. 1036-1048.
@article{f42047132f954ff38dcb2fa18325e67d,
title = "Surveillance after colorectal cancer resection: A systematic review",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Surveillance programs are widely accepted as an integral part of the treatment plan provided to patients after surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. Despite an enormous amount of research performed regarding these programs, there is still uncertainty regarding what is appropriate surveillance. OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically review recent literature regarding outcomes achieved with different types of surveillance programs for patients with surgically treated colorectal cancer. DATA SOURCES: A search of the PubMed database was performed to identify studies published in the English language between January 2000 and January 2010. STUDY SELECTION: We included 2 types of studies in our systematic review: first, comparative studies where 2 or more surveillance strategies were applied and outcomes compared; second, single-cohort studies where the outcomes of a single surveillance strategy were reported. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cancer-related outcomes included survival, recurrence detection rate, and the ability of a recurrence to be resected with curative intent. RESULTS: Our review found 15 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Of these, 9 were comparative (4 randomized trials) and 6 were single-cohort studies. One study reported a better survival rate among patients who received more intensive follow-up. The vast majority of recurrences occurred within 3 years. LIMITATIONS: Our review found that the recent literature regarding the efficacy of surveillance is inconclusive, largely because of the small sample sizes and the heterogeneity in the surveillance programs and outcomes reported. CONCLUSIONS: Future randomized trials need to focus on larger sample sizes, and experimental designs should isolate specific elements of surveillance to better understand how each element contributes to improvements in patient outcomes. Risk stratification and duration of surveillance are key elements of surveillance strategies that also deserve focused investigation.",
keywords = "Colon cancer, Quality of care, Surveillance",
author = "Bilgi Baca and Beart, {Robert W.} and Etzioni, {David A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/DCR.0b013e31820db364",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "1036--1048",
journal = "Diseases of the Colon and Rectum",
issn = "0012-3706",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surveillance after colorectal cancer resection

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Baca, Bilgi

AU - Beart, Robert W.

AU - Etzioni, David A.

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - BACKGROUND: Surveillance programs are widely accepted as an integral part of the treatment plan provided to patients after surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. Despite an enormous amount of research performed regarding these programs, there is still uncertainty regarding what is appropriate surveillance. OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically review recent literature regarding outcomes achieved with different types of surveillance programs for patients with surgically treated colorectal cancer. DATA SOURCES: A search of the PubMed database was performed to identify studies published in the English language between January 2000 and January 2010. STUDY SELECTION: We included 2 types of studies in our systematic review: first, comparative studies where 2 or more surveillance strategies were applied and outcomes compared; second, single-cohort studies where the outcomes of a single surveillance strategy were reported. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cancer-related outcomes included survival, recurrence detection rate, and the ability of a recurrence to be resected with curative intent. RESULTS: Our review found 15 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Of these, 9 were comparative (4 randomized trials) and 6 were single-cohort studies. One study reported a better survival rate among patients who received more intensive follow-up. The vast majority of recurrences occurred within 3 years. LIMITATIONS: Our review found that the recent literature regarding the efficacy of surveillance is inconclusive, largely because of the small sample sizes and the heterogeneity in the surveillance programs and outcomes reported. CONCLUSIONS: Future randomized trials need to focus on larger sample sizes, and experimental designs should isolate specific elements of surveillance to better understand how each element contributes to improvements in patient outcomes. Risk stratification and duration of surveillance are key elements of surveillance strategies that also deserve focused investigation.

AB - BACKGROUND: Surveillance programs are widely accepted as an integral part of the treatment plan provided to patients after surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. Despite an enormous amount of research performed regarding these programs, there is still uncertainty regarding what is appropriate surveillance. OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically review recent literature regarding outcomes achieved with different types of surveillance programs for patients with surgically treated colorectal cancer. DATA SOURCES: A search of the PubMed database was performed to identify studies published in the English language between January 2000 and January 2010. STUDY SELECTION: We included 2 types of studies in our systematic review: first, comparative studies where 2 or more surveillance strategies were applied and outcomes compared; second, single-cohort studies where the outcomes of a single surveillance strategy were reported. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cancer-related outcomes included survival, recurrence detection rate, and the ability of a recurrence to be resected with curative intent. RESULTS: Our review found 15 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Of these, 9 were comparative (4 randomized trials) and 6 were single-cohort studies. One study reported a better survival rate among patients who received more intensive follow-up. The vast majority of recurrences occurred within 3 years. LIMITATIONS: Our review found that the recent literature regarding the efficacy of surveillance is inconclusive, largely because of the small sample sizes and the heterogeneity in the surveillance programs and outcomes reported. CONCLUSIONS: Future randomized trials need to focus on larger sample sizes, and experimental designs should isolate specific elements of surveillance to better understand how each element contributes to improvements in patient outcomes. Risk stratification and duration of surveillance are key elements of surveillance strategies that also deserve focused investigation.

KW - Colon cancer

KW - Quality of care

KW - Surveillance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052780210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052780210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31820db364

DO - 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31820db364

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 1036

EP - 1048

JO - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

JF - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

SN - 0012-3706

IS - 8

ER -