Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: Evaluation of the effect of the size of the resection

Rodrigo M. Mardones, Carlos Gonzalez, Qingshan Chen, Mark Zobitz, Kenton R Kaufman, Robert T. Trousdale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

173 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In patients with symptomatic hip impingement, surgical resection of the femoral head-neck junction may improve the range of motion and relieve pain. A risk of this procedure is fracture. We evaluated the amount of resection of the anterolateral aspect of the femoral head-neck junction that can be done safely. Methods: Cadaveric proximal femoral specimens (fifteen matched pairs) were divided into three groups: 10%, 30%, or 50% of the diameter of one femoral neck was removed, and the contralateral femoral neck was left intact to serve as the control. A compressive load was applied directly to the femoral head. Peak load, stiffness, and energy to fracture were compared among the groups. Results: The energy to fracture differed significantly (p = 0.0015) among the 10%, 30%, and 50% resection groups. The peak load after the 50% resection was significantly less (p = 0.0025) than that after the 10% or 30% resection. With the numbers available, there was no significant difference in peak load between the 10% and 30% resections. Conclusions: Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral quadrant of the head-neck junction did not significantly alter the load-bearing capacity of the proximal part of the femur. However, a 30% resection significantly decreased the amount of energy required to produce a fracture. Thirty percent should be considered to be the greatest feasible amount of resection because of the change in the pattern of the femoral head-neck response to axial loads that we observed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-279
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A
Volume87
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2005

Fingerprint

Femoracetabular Impingement
Femur Neck
Thigh
Therapeutics
Weight-Bearing
Articular Range of Motion
Femur
Hip
Neck
Head
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement : Evaluation of the effect of the size of the resection. / Mardones, Rodrigo M.; Gonzalez, Carlos; Chen, Qingshan; Zobitz, Mark; Kaufman, Kenton R; Trousdale, Robert T.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, Vol. 87, No. 2, 02.2005, p. 273-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mardones, Rodrigo M. ; Gonzalez, Carlos ; Chen, Qingshan ; Zobitz, Mark ; Kaufman, Kenton R ; Trousdale, Robert T. / Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement : Evaluation of the effect of the size of the resection. In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A. 2005 ; Vol. 87, No. 2. pp. 273-279.
@article{f109f1ea2bd44724ad439ed07224cd63,
title = "Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: Evaluation of the effect of the size of the resection",
abstract = "Background: In patients with symptomatic hip impingement, surgical resection of the femoral head-neck junction may improve the range of motion and relieve pain. A risk of this procedure is fracture. We evaluated the amount of resection of the anterolateral aspect of the femoral head-neck junction that can be done safely. Methods: Cadaveric proximal femoral specimens (fifteen matched pairs) were divided into three groups: 10{\%}, 30{\%}, or 50{\%} of the diameter of one femoral neck was removed, and the contralateral femoral neck was left intact to serve as the control. A compressive load was applied directly to the femoral head. Peak load, stiffness, and energy to fracture were compared among the groups. Results: The energy to fracture differed significantly (p = 0.0015) among the 10{\%}, 30{\%}, and 50{\%} resection groups. The peak load after the 50{\%} resection was significantly less (p = 0.0025) than that after the 10{\%} or 30{\%} resection. With the numbers available, there was no significant difference in peak load between the 10{\%} and 30{\%} resections. Conclusions: Resection of up to 30{\%} of the anterolateral quadrant of the head-neck junction did not significantly alter the load-bearing capacity of the proximal part of the femur. However, a 30{\%} resection significantly decreased the amount of energy required to produce a fracture. Thirty percent should be considered to be the greatest feasible amount of resection because of the change in the pattern of the femoral head-neck response to axial loads that we observed.",
author = "Mardones, {Rodrigo M.} and Carlos Gonzalez and Qingshan Chen and Mark Zobitz and Kaufman, {Kenton R} and Trousdale, {Robert T.}",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
doi = "10.2106/JBJS.D.01793",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "273--279",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume",
issn = "0021-9355",
publisher = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement

T2 - Evaluation of the effect of the size of the resection

AU - Mardones, Rodrigo M.

AU - Gonzalez, Carlos

AU - Chen, Qingshan

AU - Zobitz, Mark

AU - Kaufman, Kenton R

AU - Trousdale, Robert T.

PY - 2005/2

Y1 - 2005/2

N2 - Background: In patients with symptomatic hip impingement, surgical resection of the femoral head-neck junction may improve the range of motion and relieve pain. A risk of this procedure is fracture. We evaluated the amount of resection of the anterolateral aspect of the femoral head-neck junction that can be done safely. Methods: Cadaveric proximal femoral specimens (fifteen matched pairs) were divided into three groups: 10%, 30%, or 50% of the diameter of one femoral neck was removed, and the contralateral femoral neck was left intact to serve as the control. A compressive load was applied directly to the femoral head. Peak load, stiffness, and energy to fracture were compared among the groups. Results: The energy to fracture differed significantly (p = 0.0015) among the 10%, 30%, and 50% resection groups. The peak load after the 50% resection was significantly less (p = 0.0025) than that after the 10% or 30% resection. With the numbers available, there was no significant difference in peak load between the 10% and 30% resections. Conclusions: Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral quadrant of the head-neck junction did not significantly alter the load-bearing capacity of the proximal part of the femur. However, a 30% resection significantly decreased the amount of energy required to produce a fracture. Thirty percent should be considered to be the greatest feasible amount of resection because of the change in the pattern of the femoral head-neck response to axial loads that we observed.

AB - Background: In patients with symptomatic hip impingement, surgical resection of the femoral head-neck junction may improve the range of motion and relieve pain. A risk of this procedure is fracture. We evaluated the amount of resection of the anterolateral aspect of the femoral head-neck junction that can be done safely. Methods: Cadaveric proximal femoral specimens (fifteen matched pairs) were divided into three groups: 10%, 30%, or 50% of the diameter of one femoral neck was removed, and the contralateral femoral neck was left intact to serve as the control. A compressive load was applied directly to the femoral head. Peak load, stiffness, and energy to fracture were compared among the groups. Results: The energy to fracture differed significantly (p = 0.0015) among the 10%, 30%, and 50% resection groups. The peak load after the 50% resection was significantly less (p = 0.0025) than that after the 10% or 30% resection. With the numbers available, there was no significant difference in peak load between the 10% and 30% resections. Conclusions: Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral quadrant of the head-neck junction did not significantly alter the load-bearing capacity of the proximal part of the femur. However, a 30% resection significantly decreased the amount of energy required to produce a fracture. Thirty percent should be considered to be the greatest feasible amount of resection because of the change in the pattern of the femoral head-neck response to axial loads that we observed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13444292817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13444292817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.D.01793

DO - 10.2106/JBJS.D.01793

M3 - Article

C2 - 15687147

AN - SCOPUS:13444292817

VL - 87

SP - 273

EP - 279

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

SN - 0021-9355

IS - 2

ER -