Surgical technical evidence review for gynecologic surgery conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery

Eleftheria Kalogera, Gregg Nelson, Jessica Liu, Q. Lina Hu, Clifford Y. Ko, Elizabeth Wick, Sean C. Dowdy

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, in partnership with the American College of Surgeons and the Armstrong Institute at Johns Hopkins, developed the Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery, which integrates principles of implementation science into adoption of enhanced recovery pathways and promotes evidence-based perioperative care. Objective: The objective of this study is to review the enhanced recovery pathways literature in gynecologic surgery and provide the framework for an Improving Surgical Care and Recovery pathway for gynecologic surgery. Study Design: We searched PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from 1990 through October 2017. Studies were included in hierarchical and chronological order: meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and interventional and observational studies. Enhanced recovery pathways components relevant to gynecologic surgery were identified through review of existing pathways. A PubMed search for each component was performed in gynecologic surgery and expanded to include colorectal surgery as needed to have sufficient evidence to support or deter a process. This review focuses on surgical components; anesthesiology components are reported separately in a companion article in the anesthesiology literature. Results: Fifteen surgical components were identified: patient education, bowel preparation, elimination of nasogastric tubes, minimization of surgical drains, early postoperative mobilization, early postoperative feeding, early intravenous fluid discontinuation, early removal of urinary catheters, use of laxatives, chewing gum, peripheral mu antagonists, surgical site infection reduction bundle, glucose management, and preoperative and postoperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. In addition, 14 components previously identified in the colorectal Improving Surgical Care and Recovery pathway review were included in the final pathway. Conclusion: Evidence and existing guidelines support 29 protocol elements for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery in gynecologic surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)563.e1-563.e19
JournalAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Volume219
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2018

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • Improving Surgical Care and Recovery
  • enhanced recovery after surgery
  • enhanced recovery pathway
  • gynecologic surgery
  • patient safety
  • review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this