Surgical planning of total hip arthroplasty: Accuracy of computer-assisted EndoMap software in predicting component size

Jesse A. Davila, Mark J. Kransdorf, Gavan P. Duffy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of a computer-assisted templating in the surgical planning of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty utilizing EndoMap software (Siemans AG, Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Endomap Software is an electronic program that uses DICOM images to analyze standard anteroposterior radiographs for determination of optimal prosthesis component size. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative radiographs of 36 patients undergoing uncomplicated primary total hip arthroplasty, utilizing EndoMap software, Version VA20. DICOM anteroposterior radiographs were analyzed using standard manufacturer supplied electronic templates to determine acetabular and femoral component sizes. No additional clinical information was reviewed. Acetabular and femoral component sizes were assessed by an orthopedic surgeon and two radiologists. Mean and estimated component size was compared with component size as documented in operative reports. Results: The mean estimated acetabular component size was 53 mm (range 48-60 mm), 1 mm larger than the mean implanted size of 52 mm (range 48-62 mm). Thirty-one of 36 acetabular component sizes (86%) were accurate within one size. The mean calculated femoral component size was 4 (range 2-7), 1 size smaller than the actual mean component size of 5 (range 2-9). Twenty-six of 36 femoral component sizes (72%) were accurate within one size, and accurate within two sizes in all but four cases (94%). Conclusion: EndoMap Software predicted femoral component size well, with 72% within one component size of that used, and 94% within two sizes. Acetabular component size was predicted slightly better with 86% within one component size and 94% within two component sizes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)390-393
Number of pages4
JournalSkeletal Radiology
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006

Fingerprint

Thigh
Arthroplasty
Hip
Software
Prostheses and Implants
Germany

Keywords

  • Computer software
  • Hip
  • Hip arthroplasty
  • Prothesis
  • Templating

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Surgical planning of total hip arthroplasty : Accuracy of computer-assisted EndoMap software in predicting component size. / Davila, Jesse A.; Kransdorf, Mark J.; Duffy, Gavan P.

In: Skeletal Radiology, Vol. 35, No. 6, 06.2006, p. 390-393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davila, Jesse A. ; Kransdorf, Mark J. ; Duffy, Gavan P. / Surgical planning of total hip arthroplasty : Accuracy of computer-assisted EndoMap software in predicting component size. In: Skeletal Radiology. 2006 ; Vol. 35, No. 6. pp. 390-393.
@article{539e7d63a0a84b7899478c776879a706,
title = "Surgical planning of total hip arthroplasty: Accuracy of computer-assisted EndoMap software in predicting component size",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of a computer-assisted templating in the surgical planning of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty utilizing EndoMap software (Siemans AG, Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Endomap Software is an electronic program that uses DICOM images to analyze standard anteroposterior radiographs for determination of optimal prosthesis component size. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative radiographs of 36 patients undergoing uncomplicated primary total hip arthroplasty, utilizing EndoMap software, Version VA20. DICOM anteroposterior radiographs were analyzed using standard manufacturer supplied electronic templates to determine acetabular and femoral component sizes. No additional clinical information was reviewed. Acetabular and femoral component sizes were assessed by an orthopedic surgeon and two radiologists. Mean and estimated component size was compared with component size as documented in operative reports. Results: The mean estimated acetabular component size was 53 mm (range 48-60 mm), 1 mm larger than the mean implanted size of 52 mm (range 48-62 mm). Thirty-one of 36 acetabular component sizes (86{\%}) were accurate within one size. The mean calculated femoral component size was 4 (range 2-7), 1 size smaller than the actual mean component size of 5 (range 2-9). Twenty-six of 36 femoral component sizes (72{\%}) were accurate within one size, and accurate within two sizes in all but four cases (94{\%}). Conclusion: EndoMap Software predicted femoral component size well, with 72{\%} within one component size of that used, and 94{\%} within two sizes. Acetabular component size was predicted slightly better with 86{\%} within one component size and 94{\%} within two component sizes.",
keywords = "Computer software, Hip, Hip arthroplasty, Prothesis, Templating",
author = "Davila, {Jesse A.} and Kransdorf, {Mark J.} and Duffy, {Gavan P.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s00256-006-0106-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "390--393",
journal = "Skeletal Radiology",
issn = "0364-2348",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical planning of total hip arthroplasty

T2 - Accuracy of computer-assisted EndoMap software in predicting component size

AU - Davila, Jesse A.

AU - Kransdorf, Mark J.

AU - Duffy, Gavan P.

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of a computer-assisted templating in the surgical planning of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty utilizing EndoMap software (Siemans AG, Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Endomap Software is an electronic program that uses DICOM images to analyze standard anteroposterior radiographs for determination of optimal prosthesis component size. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative radiographs of 36 patients undergoing uncomplicated primary total hip arthroplasty, utilizing EndoMap software, Version VA20. DICOM anteroposterior radiographs were analyzed using standard manufacturer supplied electronic templates to determine acetabular and femoral component sizes. No additional clinical information was reviewed. Acetabular and femoral component sizes were assessed by an orthopedic surgeon and two radiologists. Mean and estimated component size was compared with component size as documented in operative reports. Results: The mean estimated acetabular component size was 53 mm (range 48-60 mm), 1 mm larger than the mean implanted size of 52 mm (range 48-62 mm). Thirty-one of 36 acetabular component sizes (86%) were accurate within one size. The mean calculated femoral component size was 4 (range 2-7), 1 size smaller than the actual mean component size of 5 (range 2-9). Twenty-six of 36 femoral component sizes (72%) were accurate within one size, and accurate within two sizes in all but four cases (94%). Conclusion: EndoMap Software predicted femoral component size well, with 72% within one component size of that used, and 94% within two sizes. Acetabular component size was predicted slightly better with 86% within one component size and 94% within two component sizes.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of a computer-assisted templating in the surgical planning of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty utilizing EndoMap software (Siemans AG, Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Endomap Software is an electronic program that uses DICOM images to analyze standard anteroposterior radiographs for determination of optimal prosthesis component size. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative radiographs of 36 patients undergoing uncomplicated primary total hip arthroplasty, utilizing EndoMap software, Version VA20. DICOM anteroposterior radiographs were analyzed using standard manufacturer supplied electronic templates to determine acetabular and femoral component sizes. No additional clinical information was reviewed. Acetabular and femoral component sizes were assessed by an orthopedic surgeon and two radiologists. Mean and estimated component size was compared with component size as documented in operative reports. Results: The mean estimated acetabular component size was 53 mm (range 48-60 mm), 1 mm larger than the mean implanted size of 52 mm (range 48-62 mm). Thirty-one of 36 acetabular component sizes (86%) were accurate within one size. The mean calculated femoral component size was 4 (range 2-7), 1 size smaller than the actual mean component size of 5 (range 2-9). Twenty-six of 36 femoral component sizes (72%) were accurate within one size, and accurate within two sizes in all but four cases (94%). Conclusion: EndoMap Software predicted femoral component size well, with 72% within one component size of that used, and 94% within two sizes. Acetabular component size was predicted slightly better with 86% within one component size and 94% within two component sizes.

KW - Computer software

KW - Hip

KW - Hip arthroplasty

KW - Prothesis

KW - Templating

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646436215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646436215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00256-006-0106-4

DO - 10.1007/s00256-006-0106-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 16572344

AN - SCOPUS:33646436215

VL - 35

SP - 390

EP - 393

JO - Skeletal Radiology

JF - Skeletal Radiology

SN - 0364-2348

IS - 6

ER -