Surgical Outcomes of Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction in Young Women

Oscar J. Manrique, Joseph Banuelos, Amjed Abu-Ghname, Minh Doan Nguyen, Nho V. Tran, Jorys Martinez-Jorge, Christin Harless, Basel Sharaf, James W. Jakub, Amy C. Degnim, Judy C. Boughey, Steven R. Jacobson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Two-staged implant-based reconstruction (IBR) is the most common breast reconstructive modality. Recently, technological and surgical advances have encouraged surgeons to revisit prepectoral IBR. Data comparing prepectoral against subpectoral IBR in women under the age of 40 are lacking. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients under the age of 40 years old, who underwent immediate 2-staged IBR at our institution, was performed. Patient's demographics, clinical characteristics, operative details, and early surgical outcomes of prepectoral and subpectoral reconstruction were compared. Data with values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Between 2012 and 2016, 100 patients (187 breasts) who underwent prepectoral and 69 patients (124 breasts) who underwent subpectoral IBR were included. Median follow-up was 17.9 and 17.5 months in the prepectoral and subpectoral groups, respectively. Total number of complications including both stages of reconstruction was 20 (10.7%) and 19 (15.3%) in the prepectoral and subpectoral groups, respectively (P = 0.227). Specific complications, including hematoma, seroma, skin flap necrosis, wound dehiscence, and breast infections, were not significantly different among groups. Ten (5.4%) devices, including implants and tissue expander, required explantation in the prepectoral group and 8 (6.5%) in the subpectoral group (P = 0.683). Explantation was most commonly due to infection (n = 14), and all of them occurred during the first stage (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Early complications and implant explantation rates are comparable among prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction in women under 40 years old. Based on these results, we believe that prepectoral IBR is a safe, reliable, and promising reconstructive option.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere2119
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical Outcomes of Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction in Young Women'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this