TY - JOUR
T1 - Surgical Findings and Outcomes in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Oophorectomy
T2 - A Multicenter Review From the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Fellows Pelvic Research Network
AU - Harvey, Lara F.B.
AU - Abramson, Vandana G.
AU - Alvarez, Jimena
AU - DeStephano, Christopher
AU - Hur, Hye Chun
AU - Lee, Katherine
AU - Mattingly, Patricia
AU - Park, Beau
AU - Piszczek, Carolyn
AU - Seifi, Farinaz
AU - Stuparich, Mallory
AU - Yunker, Amanda
N1 - Funding Information:
The project described was supported by CTSA award No. UL1TR000445 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences . Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent official views of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences or the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Study Objective To describe the procedures performed, intra-abdominal findings, and surgical pathology in a cohort of women with premenopausal breast cancer who underwent oopherectomy. Design Multicenter retrospective chart review (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting Nine US academic medical centers participating in the Fellows’ Pelvic Research Network (FPRN). Patients One hundred twenty-seven women with premenopausal breast cancer undergoing oophorectomy between January 2013 and March 2016. Intervention Surgical castration. Measurements and Main Results The mean patient age was 45.8 years. Fourteen patients (11%) carried a BRCA mutations, and 22 (17%) carried another germline or acquired mutation, including multiple variants of uncertain significance. There was wide variation in surgical approach. Sixty-five patients (51%) underwent pelvic washings, and 43 (35%) underwent concurrent hysterectomy. Other concomitant procedures included midurethral sling placement, appendectomy, and hysteroscopy. Three patients experienced complications (transfusion, wound cellulitis, and vaginal cuff dehiscence). Thirteen patients (10%) had ovarian pathology detected on analysis of the surgical specimen, including metastatic tumor, serous cystadenomas, endometriomas, and Brenner tumor. Eight patients (6%) had Fallopian tube pathology, including 3 serous tubal intraepithelial cancers. Among the 44 uterine specimens, 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma and 1 multifocal endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia were noted. Regarding the entire study population, the number of patients meeting our study criteria and seen by gynecologic surgeons in the FPRN for oophorectomy increased by nearly 400% from 2013 to 2015. Conclusion Since publication of the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial data, bilateral oophorectomy has been recommended for some women with premenopausal breast cancer to facilitate breast cancer treatment with aromatase inhibitors. These women may be at elevated risk for occult abdominal pathology compared with the general population. Gynecologic surgeons often perform castration oophorectomy in patients with breast cancer as an increasing number of oncologists are using aromatase inhibitors to treat premenopausal breast cancer. Our data suggest that other abdominal/pelvic cancers, precancerous conditions, and previously unrecognized metastatic disease are not uncommon findings in this patient population. Gynecologists serving this patient population may consider a careful abdominal survey, pelvic washings, endometrial sampling, and serial sectioning of fallopian tube specimens for a thorough evaluation.
AB - Study Objective To describe the procedures performed, intra-abdominal findings, and surgical pathology in a cohort of women with premenopausal breast cancer who underwent oopherectomy. Design Multicenter retrospective chart review (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting Nine US academic medical centers participating in the Fellows’ Pelvic Research Network (FPRN). Patients One hundred twenty-seven women with premenopausal breast cancer undergoing oophorectomy between January 2013 and March 2016. Intervention Surgical castration. Measurements and Main Results The mean patient age was 45.8 years. Fourteen patients (11%) carried a BRCA mutations, and 22 (17%) carried another germline or acquired mutation, including multiple variants of uncertain significance. There was wide variation in surgical approach. Sixty-five patients (51%) underwent pelvic washings, and 43 (35%) underwent concurrent hysterectomy. Other concomitant procedures included midurethral sling placement, appendectomy, and hysteroscopy. Three patients experienced complications (transfusion, wound cellulitis, and vaginal cuff dehiscence). Thirteen patients (10%) had ovarian pathology detected on analysis of the surgical specimen, including metastatic tumor, serous cystadenomas, endometriomas, and Brenner tumor. Eight patients (6%) had Fallopian tube pathology, including 3 serous tubal intraepithelial cancers. Among the 44 uterine specimens, 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma and 1 multifocal endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia were noted. Regarding the entire study population, the number of patients meeting our study criteria and seen by gynecologic surgeons in the FPRN for oophorectomy increased by nearly 400% from 2013 to 2015. Conclusion Since publication of the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial data, bilateral oophorectomy has been recommended for some women with premenopausal breast cancer to facilitate breast cancer treatment with aromatase inhibitors. These women may be at elevated risk for occult abdominal pathology compared with the general population. Gynecologic surgeons often perform castration oophorectomy in patients with breast cancer as an increasing number of oncologists are using aromatase inhibitors to treat premenopausal breast cancer. Our data suggest that other abdominal/pelvic cancers, precancerous conditions, and previously unrecognized metastatic disease are not uncommon findings in this patient population. Gynecologists serving this patient population may consider a careful abdominal survey, pelvic washings, endometrial sampling, and serial sectioning of fallopian tube specimens for a thorough evaluation.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Occult cancer
KW - Ovarian mass
KW - Salpingo-oophorectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029586686&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029586686&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.643
DO - 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.643
M3 - Article
C2 - 28821472
AN - SCOPUS:85029586686
SN - 1553-4650
VL - 25
SP - 111
EP - 115
JO - Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
JF - Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
IS - 1
ER -