Surgical case listing accuracy: Failure analysis at a high-volume academic medical center

Robert R. Cima, Curt Hale, Anantha Kollengode, James C. Rogers, Stephen D. Cassivi, Claude Deschamps

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypothesis: Describe the incidence, type, and detection method of surgical listing errors and implement a system to reduce errors. Design: All errors/discrepancies between the surgical listing and the performed procedure reported to an institutional event line during 2008 were analyzed. Setting: Academic tertiary medical center. Main Outcome Measures: Error characteristics and detection mode were documented. An error causal tree analysis was developed and used to modify the standard listing process to reduce errors. Results: During 2008, 759 listing errors were reported of 55 197 surgical procedures for an error rate of 1.38%. No wrong-site surgeries occurred. The errors were missing laterality (501; 66%), incorrect side (108; 14%), incorrect listing besides laterality (86; 11%), and other (64; 9%). Identification/ correction of the listing error occurred in the following areas: nursing review the evening prior to surgery (517; 68%), preoperative admission unit (132; 17%), operating room (98; 12%), recovery room (6; 0.8%), and other (6; 0.8%). Using a causal tree analysis, error-proofing strategies applied in an electronic standardized case listing system significantly reduced the error rate from 1.50% to 0.54% (P < .05) and 2.06% to 0.49% (P < .05) in gynecologic and colorectal surgery, respectively. Conclusions: Surgical listings errors occur with a low constant rate across specialties. The majorities of errors were related to laterality and were detected prior to surgery. An electronic listing system using standardized case descriptions with required laterality significantly reduced the error frequency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)641-646
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume145
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

Medical Errors
Recovery Room
Colorectal Surgery
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
Operating Rooms
Nursing
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Cima, R. R., Hale, C., Kollengode, A., Rogers, J. C., Cassivi, S. D., & Deschamps, C. (2010). Surgical case listing accuracy: Failure analysis at a high-volume academic medical center. Archives of Surgery, 145(7), 641-646. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2010.112

Surgical case listing accuracy : Failure analysis at a high-volume academic medical center. / Cima, Robert R.; Hale, Curt; Kollengode, Anantha; Rogers, James C.; Cassivi, Stephen D.; Deschamps, Claude.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 145, No. 7, 07.2010, p. 641-646.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cima, RR, Hale, C, Kollengode, A, Rogers, JC, Cassivi, SD & Deschamps, C 2010, 'Surgical case listing accuracy: Failure analysis at a high-volume academic medical center', Archives of Surgery, vol. 145, no. 7, pp. 641-646. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2010.112
Cima, Robert R. ; Hale, Curt ; Kollengode, Anantha ; Rogers, James C. ; Cassivi, Stephen D. ; Deschamps, Claude. / Surgical case listing accuracy : Failure analysis at a high-volume academic medical center. In: Archives of Surgery. 2010 ; Vol. 145, No. 7. pp. 641-646.
@article{a6a66784e4da4b5b8646812beb9db62b,
title = "Surgical case listing accuracy: Failure analysis at a high-volume academic medical center",
abstract = "Hypothesis: Describe the incidence, type, and detection method of surgical listing errors and implement a system to reduce errors. Design: All errors/discrepancies between the surgical listing and the performed procedure reported to an institutional event line during 2008 were analyzed. Setting: Academic tertiary medical center. Main Outcome Measures: Error characteristics and detection mode were documented. An error causal tree analysis was developed and used to modify the standard listing process to reduce errors. Results: During 2008, 759 listing errors were reported of 55 197 surgical procedures for an error rate of 1.38{\%}. No wrong-site surgeries occurred. The errors were missing laterality (501; 66{\%}), incorrect side (108; 14{\%}), incorrect listing besides laterality (86; 11{\%}), and other (64; 9{\%}). Identification/ correction of the listing error occurred in the following areas: nursing review the evening prior to surgery (517; 68{\%}), preoperative admission unit (132; 17{\%}), operating room (98; 12{\%}), recovery room (6; 0.8{\%}), and other (6; 0.8{\%}). Using a causal tree analysis, error-proofing strategies applied in an electronic standardized case listing system significantly reduced the error rate from 1.50{\%} to 0.54{\%} (P < .05) and 2.06{\%} to 0.49{\%} (P < .05) in gynecologic and colorectal surgery, respectively. Conclusions: Surgical listings errors occur with a low constant rate across specialties. The majorities of errors were related to laterality and were detected prior to surgery. An electronic listing system using standardized case descriptions with required laterality significantly reduced the error frequency.",
author = "Cima, {Robert R.} and Curt Hale and Anantha Kollengode and Rogers, {James C.} and Cassivi, {Stephen D.} and Claude Deschamps",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1001/archsurg.2010.112",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "145",
pages = "641--646",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical case listing accuracy

T2 - Failure analysis at a high-volume academic medical center

AU - Cima, Robert R.

AU - Hale, Curt

AU - Kollengode, Anantha

AU - Rogers, James C.

AU - Cassivi, Stephen D.

AU - Deschamps, Claude

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - Hypothesis: Describe the incidence, type, and detection method of surgical listing errors and implement a system to reduce errors. Design: All errors/discrepancies between the surgical listing and the performed procedure reported to an institutional event line during 2008 were analyzed. Setting: Academic tertiary medical center. Main Outcome Measures: Error characteristics and detection mode were documented. An error causal tree analysis was developed and used to modify the standard listing process to reduce errors. Results: During 2008, 759 listing errors were reported of 55 197 surgical procedures for an error rate of 1.38%. No wrong-site surgeries occurred. The errors were missing laterality (501; 66%), incorrect side (108; 14%), incorrect listing besides laterality (86; 11%), and other (64; 9%). Identification/ correction of the listing error occurred in the following areas: nursing review the evening prior to surgery (517; 68%), preoperative admission unit (132; 17%), operating room (98; 12%), recovery room (6; 0.8%), and other (6; 0.8%). Using a causal tree analysis, error-proofing strategies applied in an electronic standardized case listing system significantly reduced the error rate from 1.50% to 0.54% (P < .05) and 2.06% to 0.49% (P < .05) in gynecologic and colorectal surgery, respectively. Conclusions: Surgical listings errors occur with a low constant rate across specialties. The majorities of errors were related to laterality and were detected prior to surgery. An electronic listing system using standardized case descriptions with required laterality significantly reduced the error frequency.

AB - Hypothesis: Describe the incidence, type, and detection method of surgical listing errors and implement a system to reduce errors. Design: All errors/discrepancies between the surgical listing and the performed procedure reported to an institutional event line during 2008 were analyzed. Setting: Academic tertiary medical center. Main Outcome Measures: Error characteristics and detection mode were documented. An error causal tree analysis was developed and used to modify the standard listing process to reduce errors. Results: During 2008, 759 listing errors were reported of 55 197 surgical procedures for an error rate of 1.38%. No wrong-site surgeries occurred. The errors were missing laterality (501; 66%), incorrect side (108; 14%), incorrect listing besides laterality (86; 11%), and other (64; 9%). Identification/ correction of the listing error occurred in the following areas: nursing review the evening prior to surgery (517; 68%), preoperative admission unit (132; 17%), operating room (98; 12%), recovery room (6; 0.8%), and other (6; 0.8%). Using a causal tree analysis, error-proofing strategies applied in an electronic standardized case listing system significantly reduced the error rate from 1.50% to 0.54% (P < .05) and 2.06% to 0.49% (P < .05) in gynecologic and colorectal surgery, respectively. Conclusions: Surgical listings errors occur with a low constant rate across specialties. The majorities of errors were related to laterality and were detected prior to surgery. An electronic listing system using standardized case descriptions with required laterality significantly reduced the error frequency.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954963002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954963002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.2010.112

DO - 10.1001/archsurg.2010.112

M3 - Article

C2 - 20644126

AN - SCOPUS:77954963002

VL - 145

SP - 641

EP - 646

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 7

ER -