Surgery for aortic regurgitation in women

Contrasting indications and outcomes compared with men

Elizabeth Klodas, Maurice E Sarano, A. Jamil Tajik, Charles J. Mullany, Kent R Bailey, James B. Seward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Indications for surgical correction of aortic regurgitation have been established mostly in men and have not been validated in women. The outcome of this surgical correction in women is unknown. Methods and Results: Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between 51 women and 198 men undergoing surgery for isolated aortic regurgitation between 1980 and 1989. Compared with men, women had surgery rarely for severe left ventricular enlargement (systolic diameter ≤55 mm in 11% versus 27%, P=.031; diastolic diameter ≤80 mm in 0% versus 16%, P<.0001) and more often for class III to IV symptoms (59% versus 32%, P<.0001). Operative mortalities were similar in women and men (3.9% and 4.5%, respectively). Among operative survivors, 10-year survival was worse for women than for men (39±9% versus 72±4%, P=.0002) and, in contrast with men, was worse than expected for women (P<.0001). Independent predictors of late survival were different for men (age and ejection fraction) and women (age and concomitant coronary bypass grafting). By multivariate analysis, female sex was an independent predictor of worse late survival (adjusted relative risk, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.11). Conclusions: The generalization to women of the unadjusted left ventricular diameter surgical criteria established in men results in irrelevant criteria almost never reached in women, who often undergo surgery after developing severe symptoms. After surgery, women exhibit an excess late mortality, suggesting that surgical correction of aortic regurgitation should be considered at an earlier stage in women.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2472-2478
Number of pages7
JournalCirculation
Volume94
Issue number10
StatePublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Aortic Valve Insufficiency
Survival
Mortality
Survivors
Multivariate Analysis

Keywords

  • aorta
  • prognosis
  • regurgitation
  • surgery
  • women

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Surgery for aortic regurgitation in women : Contrasting indications and outcomes compared with men. / Klodas, Elizabeth; Sarano, Maurice E; Tajik, A. Jamil; Mullany, Charles J.; Bailey, Kent R; Seward, James B.

In: Circulation, Vol. 94, No. 10, 1996, p. 2472-2478.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Klodas, E, Sarano, ME, Tajik, AJ, Mullany, CJ, Bailey, KR & Seward, JB 1996, 'Surgery for aortic regurgitation in women: Contrasting indications and outcomes compared with men', Circulation, vol. 94, no. 10, pp. 2472-2478.
Klodas, Elizabeth ; Sarano, Maurice E ; Tajik, A. Jamil ; Mullany, Charles J. ; Bailey, Kent R ; Seward, James B. / Surgery for aortic regurgitation in women : Contrasting indications and outcomes compared with men. In: Circulation. 1996 ; Vol. 94, No. 10. pp. 2472-2478.
@article{f16cfb4325b145bab70d863670f3fe75,
title = "Surgery for aortic regurgitation in women: Contrasting indications and outcomes compared with men",
abstract = "Background: Indications for surgical correction of aortic regurgitation have been established mostly in men and have not been validated in women. The outcome of this surgical correction in women is unknown. Methods and Results: Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between 51 women and 198 men undergoing surgery for isolated aortic regurgitation between 1980 and 1989. Compared with men, women had surgery rarely for severe left ventricular enlargement (systolic diameter ≤55 mm in 11{\%} versus 27{\%}, P=.031; diastolic diameter ≤80 mm in 0{\%} versus 16{\%}, P<.0001) and more often for class III to IV symptoms (59{\%} versus 32{\%}, P<.0001). Operative mortalities were similar in women and men (3.9{\%} and 4.5{\%}, respectively). Among operative survivors, 10-year survival was worse for women than for men (39±9{\%} versus 72±4{\%}, P=.0002) and, in contrast with men, was worse than expected for women (P<.0001). Independent predictors of late survival were different for men (age and ejection fraction) and women (age and concomitant coronary bypass grafting). By multivariate analysis, female sex was an independent predictor of worse late survival (adjusted relative risk, 1.80; 95{\%} CI, 1.04 to 3.11). Conclusions: The generalization to women of the unadjusted left ventricular diameter surgical criteria established in men results in irrelevant criteria almost never reached in women, who often undergo surgery after developing severe symptoms. After surgery, women exhibit an excess late mortality, suggesting that surgical correction of aortic regurgitation should be considered at an earlier stage in women.",
keywords = "aorta, prognosis, regurgitation, surgery, women",
author = "Elizabeth Klodas and Sarano, {Maurice E} and Tajik, {A. Jamil} and Mullany, {Charles J.} and Bailey, {Kent R} and Seward, {James B.}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "2472--2478",
journal = "Circulation",
issn = "0009-7322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgery for aortic regurgitation in women

T2 - Contrasting indications and outcomes compared with men

AU - Klodas, Elizabeth

AU - Sarano, Maurice E

AU - Tajik, A. Jamil

AU - Mullany, Charles J.

AU - Bailey, Kent R

AU - Seward, James B.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Background: Indications for surgical correction of aortic regurgitation have been established mostly in men and have not been validated in women. The outcome of this surgical correction in women is unknown. Methods and Results: Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between 51 women and 198 men undergoing surgery for isolated aortic regurgitation between 1980 and 1989. Compared with men, women had surgery rarely for severe left ventricular enlargement (systolic diameter ≤55 mm in 11% versus 27%, P=.031; diastolic diameter ≤80 mm in 0% versus 16%, P<.0001) and more often for class III to IV symptoms (59% versus 32%, P<.0001). Operative mortalities were similar in women and men (3.9% and 4.5%, respectively). Among operative survivors, 10-year survival was worse for women than for men (39±9% versus 72±4%, P=.0002) and, in contrast with men, was worse than expected for women (P<.0001). Independent predictors of late survival were different for men (age and ejection fraction) and women (age and concomitant coronary bypass grafting). By multivariate analysis, female sex was an independent predictor of worse late survival (adjusted relative risk, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.11). Conclusions: The generalization to women of the unadjusted left ventricular diameter surgical criteria established in men results in irrelevant criteria almost never reached in women, who often undergo surgery after developing severe symptoms. After surgery, women exhibit an excess late mortality, suggesting that surgical correction of aortic regurgitation should be considered at an earlier stage in women.

AB - Background: Indications for surgical correction of aortic regurgitation have been established mostly in men and have not been validated in women. The outcome of this surgical correction in women is unknown. Methods and Results: Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between 51 women and 198 men undergoing surgery for isolated aortic regurgitation between 1980 and 1989. Compared with men, women had surgery rarely for severe left ventricular enlargement (systolic diameter ≤55 mm in 11% versus 27%, P=.031; diastolic diameter ≤80 mm in 0% versus 16%, P<.0001) and more often for class III to IV symptoms (59% versus 32%, P<.0001). Operative mortalities were similar in women and men (3.9% and 4.5%, respectively). Among operative survivors, 10-year survival was worse for women than for men (39±9% versus 72±4%, P=.0002) and, in contrast with men, was worse than expected for women (P<.0001). Independent predictors of late survival were different for men (age and ejection fraction) and women (age and concomitant coronary bypass grafting). By multivariate analysis, female sex was an independent predictor of worse late survival (adjusted relative risk, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.11). Conclusions: The generalization to women of the unadjusted left ventricular diameter surgical criteria established in men results in irrelevant criteria almost never reached in women, who often undergo surgery after developing severe symptoms. After surgery, women exhibit an excess late mortality, suggesting that surgical correction of aortic regurgitation should be considered at an earlier stage in women.

KW - aorta

KW - prognosis

KW - regurgitation

KW - surgery

KW - women

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029827109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029827109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 94

SP - 2472

EP - 2478

JO - Circulation

JF - Circulation

SN - 0009-7322

IS - 10

ER -