Sural nerve biopsy utility by masked assessment of individual histologic preparations

Background and Aims: Comprehensive study of sural nerve biopsy utility based on individual histopathologic preparations is lacking. We aimed to quantify the value of different histologic preparations in diagnosis. Methods: One hundred consecutive sural nerves were studied by standard histological preparations plus graded teased nerve fibers (GTNF), immunohistochemistry, and epoxy-semithin morphometry. Three examiners scored the individual preparations separately by a questionnaire of neuropathic and interstitial abnormalities, masked to the biopsy number, versus a gold-standard of all preparations. Multivariate modeling was utilized to determine best approach versus the gold-standard. Results: Highest confidence (range 8–9 of 10) and inter-rater reliability (99%) for fiber abnormalities came from GTNF, and interstitial abnormalities from paraffin stains (range 7–8, 99%). Vasculitic neuropathy associated with GTNF axonal degeneration (moderate to severe 79%) with OR 3.8, 95% CI (1.001–14.7), p =.04, but not significantly with the other preparations. Clinicopathologic diagnoses associated with teased fiber abnormalities in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, 80% (8/10); amyloidosis, 50% (1/2); adult-onset polyglucosan disease 100% (1/1). GTNF and paraffin stains significantly correlated with fiber density determined by morphometric analysis (GTNF: OR 9.9, p <.0001, paraffin: OR 3.8, p =.03). GTNF combined with paraffin sections had highest accuracy for clinicopathologic diagnoses and fiber density with 0.86 C-stat prediction versus morphometric analysis. Pathological results lead to initiation or changes of immunotherapy in 70% (35/50; initiation n = 22, reduction n = 9, escalation n = 4) with the remaining having alternative intervention or no change. Interpretation: Nerve biopsy paraffin stains combined with GTNF have highest diagnostic utility, confidence, inter-rater reliability, improving accuracy for a pathologic diagnosis aiding treatment recommendations. Immunostains and epoxy preparations are also demonstrated useful supporting consensus guidelines. This study provides class II evidence for individual nerve preparation utility.