SU‐FF‐T‐560: Evaluation of ExacTrac and CBCT Patient Positioning On the Novalis TX

n(Wink) Walls, T. Nurushev, K. Levin, S. Patel, B. Movsas, S. Ryu, I. Chetty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the precision and accuracy of patient localization using a cone‐beam CT (CBCT) and an orthogonal x‐ray pair with infrared markers on the Novalis Tx treatment unit. Method and Materials: Twenty stereotactic radiosurgery/therapy patients with a total of twenty‐five lesions over ninety sessions (ranging from 1−5 fractions per patient) were localized daily using both ExacTrac (ETX, BrainLab) and on‐board CBCT (Varian) coupled to the Novalis Tx treatment unit. Each patient was first positioned using the ETX system accounting for variances in all six dimensions using a robotic couch top. Following these shifts, a CBCT was performed and further translations were made (x, y, z, table rotation) based on image fusion between the CBCT and simulation CT. A phantom study was also performed, mimicking the patient set‐up method to assess the reproducibility of each system and to determine any systematic differences between the ETX and CBCT localization approaches. Results: Patient positioning between ETX and CBCT was consistent in all four dimensions within 1.1mm and 0.1°. The average discrepancy between each system across all sessions was 1.1±1.2mm A/P, 1.0±1.2mm S/I, 0.1±1.4mm M/L, and 0.1°±0.5° couch rotation. Phantom testing showed that both systems were reproducible within 1.5mm and 0.5° in all dimensions. A systematic discrepancy of 0.3mm A/P, 1.2mm S/I, 0.8mm M/L, and 0.6° rotation was found between the two systems; however, this difference was deemed to be within the calibration tolerance of both systems. Conclusions: The ETX and on‐board CBCT systems were found to agree on tumor localization within 1.1mm (all dimensions) and 0.1° (couch rotation). Phantom studies showed the reproducibility of each system to be acceptable for stereotactic treatments. The Novalis Tx treatment unit incorporates both fiducial marker‐based, and volume‐based localization for reproducible and accurate SRS/SBRT patient treatments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Positioning
Therapeutics
Radiosurgery
Robotics
Calibration
X-Rays
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Walls, NW., Nurushev, T., Levin, K., Patel, S., Movsas, B., Ryu, S., & Chetty, I. (2009). SU‐FF‐T‐560: Evaluation of ExacTrac and CBCT Patient Positioning On the Novalis TX. Medical Physics, 36(6). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3182058

SU‐FF‐T‐560 : Evaluation of ExacTrac and CBCT Patient Positioning On the Novalis TX. / Walls, n(Wink); Nurushev, T.; Levin, K.; Patel, S.; Movsas, B.; Ryu, S.; Chetty, I.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 36, No. 6, 01.01.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Walls, NW, Nurushev, T, Levin, K, Patel, S, Movsas, B, Ryu, S & Chetty, I 2009, 'SU‐FF‐T‐560: Evaluation of ExacTrac and CBCT Patient Positioning On the Novalis TX', Medical Physics, vol. 36, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3182058
Walls, n(Wink) ; Nurushev, T. ; Levin, K. ; Patel, S. ; Movsas, B. ; Ryu, S. ; Chetty, I. / SU‐FF‐T‐560 : Evaluation of ExacTrac and CBCT Patient Positioning On the Novalis TX. In: Medical Physics. 2009 ; Vol. 36, No. 6.
@article{6acf18c0764b417d816454e6487ff4a9,
title = "SU‐FF‐T‐560: Evaluation of ExacTrac and CBCT Patient Positioning On the Novalis TX",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the precision and accuracy of patient localization using a cone‐beam CT (CBCT) and an orthogonal x‐ray pair with infrared markers on the Novalis Tx treatment unit. Method and Materials: Twenty stereotactic radiosurgery/therapy patients with a total of twenty‐five lesions over ninety sessions (ranging from 1−5 fractions per patient) were localized daily using both ExacTrac (ETX, BrainLab) and on‐board CBCT (Varian) coupled to the Novalis Tx treatment unit. Each patient was first positioned using the ETX system accounting for variances in all six dimensions using a robotic couch top. Following these shifts, a CBCT was performed and further translations were made (x, y, z, table rotation) based on image fusion between the CBCT and simulation CT. A phantom study was also performed, mimicking the patient set‐up method to assess the reproducibility of each system and to determine any systematic differences between the ETX and CBCT localization approaches. Results: Patient positioning between ETX and CBCT was consistent in all four dimensions within 1.1mm and 0.1°. The average discrepancy between each system across all sessions was 1.1±1.2mm A/P, 1.0±1.2mm S/I, 0.1±1.4mm M/L, and 0.1°±0.5° couch rotation. Phantom testing showed that both systems were reproducible within 1.5mm and 0.5° in all dimensions. A systematic discrepancy of 0.3mm A/P, 1.2mm S/I, 0.8mm M/L, and 0.6° rotation was found between the two systems; however, this difference was deemed to be within the calibration tolerance of both systems. Conclusions: The ETX and on‐board CBCT systems were found to agree on tumor localization within 1.1mm (all dimensions) and 0.1° (couch rotation). Phantom studies showed the reproducibility of each system to be acceptable for stereotactic treatments. The Novalis Tx treatment unit incorporates both fiducial marker‐based, and volume‐based localization for reproducible and accurate SRS/SBRT patient treatments.",
author = "n(Wink) Walls and T. Nurushev and K. Levin and S. Patel and B. Movsas and S. Ryu and I. Chetty",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.3182058",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐FF‐T‐560

T2 - Evaluation of ExacTrac and CBCT Patient Positioning On the Novalis TX

AU - Walls, n(Wink)

AU - Nurushev, T.

AU - Levin, K.

AU - Patel, S.

AU - Movsas, B.

AU - Ryu, S.

AU - Chetty, I.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the precision and accuracy of patient localization using a cone‐beam CT (CBCT) and an orthogonal x‐ray pair with infrared markers on the Novalis Tx treatment unit. Method and Materials: Twenty stereotactic radiosurgery/therapy patients with a total of twenty‐five lesions over ninety sessions (ranging from 1−5 fractions per patient) were localized daily using both ExacTrac (ETX, BrainLab) and on‐board CBCT (Varian) coupled to the Novalis Tx treatment unit. Each patient was first positioned using the ETX system accounting for variances in all six dimensions using a robotic couch top. Following these shifts, a CBCT was performed and further translations were made (x, y, z, table rotation) based on image fusion between the CBCT and simulation CT. A phantom study was also performed, mimicking the patient set‐up method to assess the reproducibility of each system and to determine any systematic differences between the ETX and CBCT localization approaches. Results: Patient positioning between ETX and CBCT was consistent in all four dimensions within 1.1mm and 0.1°. The average discrepancy between each system across all sessions was 1.1±1.2mm A/P, 1.0±1.2mm S/I, 0.1±1.4mm M/L, and 0.1°±0.5° couch rotation. Phantom testing showed that both systems were reproducible within 1.5mm and 0.5° in all dimensions. A systematic discrepancy of 0.3mm A/P, 1.2mm S/I, 0.8mm M/L, and 0.6° rotation was found between the two systems; however, this difference was deemed to be within the calibration tolerance of both systems. Conclusions: The ETX and on‐board CBCT systems were found to agree on tumor localization within 1.1mm (all dimensions) and 0.1° (couch rotation). Phantom studies showed the reproducibility of each system to be acceptable for stereotactic treatments. The Novalis Tx treatment unit incorporates both fiducial marker‐based, and volume‐based localization for reproducible and accurate SRS/SBRT patient treatments.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the precision and accuracy of patient localization using a cone‐beam CT (CBCT) and an orthogonal x‐ray pair with infrared markers on the Novalis Tx treatment unit. Method and Materials: Twenty stereotactic radiosurgery/therapy patients with a total of twenty‐five lesions over ninety sessions (ranging from 1−5 fractions per patient) were localized daily using both ExacTrac (ETX, BrainLab) and on‐board CBCT (Varian) coupled to the Novalis Tx treatment unit. Each patient was first positioned using the ETX system accounting for variances in all six dimensions using a robotic couch top. Following these shifts, a CBCT was performed and further translations were made (x, y, z, table rotation) based on image fusion between the CBCT and simulation CT. A phantom study was also performed, mimicking the patient set‐up method to assess the reproducibility of each system and to determine any systematic differences between the ETX and CBCT localization approaches. Results: Patient positioning between ETX and CBCT was consistent in all four dimensions within 1.1mm and 0.1°. The average discrepancy between each system across all sessions was 1.1±1.2mm A/P, 1.0±1.2mm S/I, 0.1±1.4mm M/L, and 0.1°±0.5° couch rotation. Phantom testing showed that both systems were reproducible within 1.5mm and 0.5° in all dimensions. A systematic discrepancy of 0.3mm A/P, 1.2mm S/I, 0.8mm M/L, and 0.6° rotation was found between the two systems; however, this difference was deemed to be within the calibration tolerance of both systems. Conclusions: The ETX and on‐board CBCT systems were found to agree on tumor localization within 1.1mm (all dimensions) and 0.1° (couch rotation). Phantom studies showed the reproducibility of each system to be acceptable for stereotactic treatments. The Novalis Tx treatment unit incorporates both fiducial marker‐based, and volume‐based localization for reproducible and accurate SRS/SBRT patient treatments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024801901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024801901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3182058

DO - 10.1118/1.3182058

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024801901

VL - 36

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -