Subsequent pulmonary embolism: Risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram - Prospective comparison with scintigraphy

Lawrence R. Goodman, Randolph J. Lipchik, Ronald S Kuzo, Yu Liu, Timothy L. McAuliffe, Daniel J. O'Brien

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

239 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether a helical computed tomographic (CT) scan that is negative for pulmonary embolism (PE) is a sufficiently reliable criterion to safely withhold anticoagulation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with negative helical CT scans were prospectively compared with patients with negative or low-probability scintigrams. In a 460-bed university hospital and clinic, 1,015 adult patients underwent either scintigraphy or helical CT for possible PE for 25 months. Five hundred forty- eight patients who had negative images and were not receiving anticoagulation therapy were prospectively followed up for 3 months for clinical, new imaging, death certificate, or autopsy evidence of subsequent PE. Ninety- seven patients were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: Subsequent PE was found in two (1.0%) of 198 patients with negative CT scans, none of 188 patients with negative ventilation-perfusion (V-P) scans, and five (3.1%) of 162 patients with low-probability V-P scans (not statistically significant). Patient in the helical CT group were hospitalized more often, had more severe disease, had more substantial PE risk factors, and had a higher death rate. No deaths were attributed to PE in either group. CONCLUSION: The frequency of clinical diagnoses of PE after a negative CT scan was low and similar to that after a negative or low-probability V-P scan. Helical CT is a reliable imaging tool for excluding clinically important PE.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)535-542
Number of pages8
JournalRadiology
Volume215
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pulmonary Embolism
Radionuclide Imaging
Angiography
Lung
Perfusion
Death Certificates
Lost to Follow-Up
Ventilation
Autopsy
Mortality
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies
  • Computed tomography (CT), helical
  • Embolism, pulmonary
  • Lung, perfusion
  • Lung, ventilation
  • Pulmonary arteries, CT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Goodman, L. R., Lipchik, R. J., Kuzo, R. S., Liu, Y., McAuliffe, T. L., & O'Brien, D. J. (2000). Subsequent pulmonary embolism: Risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram - Prospective comparison with scintigraphy. Radiology, 215(2), 535-542.

Subsequent pulmonary embolism : Risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram - Prospective comparison with scintigraphy. / Goodman, Lawrence R.; Lipchik, Randolph J.; Kuzo, Ronald S; Liu, Yu; McAuliffe, Timothy L.; O'Brien, Daniel J.

In: Radiology, Vol. 215, No. 2, 2000, p. 535-542.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goodman, LR, Lipchik, RJ, Kuzo, RS, Liu, Y, McAuliffe, TL & O'Brien, DJ 2000, 'Subsequent pulmonary embolism: Risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram - Prospective comparison with scintigraphy', Radiology, vol. 215, no. 2, pp. 535-542.
Goodman, Lawrence R. ; Lipchik, Randolph J. ; Kuzo, Ronald S ; Liu, Yu ; McAuliffe, Timothy L. ; O'Brien, Daniel J. / Subsequent pulmonary embolism : Risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram - Prospective comparison with scintigraphy. In: Radiology. 2000 ; Vol. 215, No. 2. pp. 535-542.
@article{67ae78d425bc4e2e9798d0dc99bcff97,
title = "Subsequent pulmonary embolism: Risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram - Prospective comparison with scintigraphy",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To determine whether a helical computed tomographic (CT) scan that is negative for pulmonary embolism (PE) is a sufficiently reliable criterion to safely withhold anticoagulation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with negative helical CT scans were prospectively compared with patients with negative or low-probability scintigrams. In a 460-bed university hospital and clinic, 1,015 adult patients underwent either scintigraphy or helical CT for possible PE for 25 months. Five hundred forty- eight patients who had negative images and were not receiving anticoagulation therapy were prospectively followed up for 3 months for clinical, new imaging, death certificate, or autopsy evidence of subsequent PE. Ninety- seven patients were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: Subsequent PE was found in two (1.0{\%}) of 198 patients with negative CT scans, none of 188 patients with negative ventilation-perfusion (V-P) scans, and five (3.1{\%}) of 162 patients with low-probability V-P scans (not statistically significant). Patient in the helical CT group were hospitalized more often, had more severe disease, had more substantial PE risk factors, and had a higher death rate. No deaths were attributed to PE in either group. CONCLUSION: The frequency of clinical diagnoses of PE after a negative CT scan was low and similar to that after a negative or low-probability V-P scan. Helical CT is a reliable imaging tool for excluding clinically important PE.",
keywords = "Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies, Computed tomography (CT), helical, Embolism, pulmonary, Lung, perfusion, Lung, ventilation, Pulmonary arteries, CT",
author = "Goodman, {Lawrence R.} and Lipchik, {Randolph J.} and Kuzo, {Ronald S} and Yu Liu and McAuliffe, {Timothy L.} and O'Brien, {Daniel J.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "215",
pages = "535--542",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subsequent pulmonary embolism

T2 - Risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram - Prospective comparison with scintigraphy

AU - Goodman, Lawrence R.

AU - Lipchik, Randolph J.

AU - Kuzo, Ronald S

AU - Liu, Yu

AU - McAuliffe, Timothy L.

AU - O'Brien, Daniel J.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - PURPOSE: To determine whether a helical computed tomographic (CT) scan that is negative for pulmonary embolism (PE) is a sufficiently reliable criterion to safely withhold anticoagulation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with negative helical CT scans were prospectively compared with patients with negative or low-probability scintigrams. In a 460-bed university hospital and clinic, 1,015 adult patients underwent either scintigraphy or helical CT for possible PE for 25 months. Five hundred forty- eight patients who had negative images and were not receiving anticoagulation therapy were prospectively followed up for 3 months for clinical, new imaging, death certificate, or autopsy evidence of subsequent PE. Ninety- seven patients were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: Subsequent PE was found in two (1.0%) of 198 patients with negative CT scans, none of 188 patients with negative ventilation-perfusion (V-P) scans, and five (3.1%) of 162 patients with low-probability V-P scans (not statistically significant). Patient in the helical CT group were hospitalized more often, had more severe disease, had more substantial PE risk factors, and had a higher death rate. No deaths were attributed to PE in either group. CONCLUSION: The frequency of clinical diagnoses of PE after a negative CT scan was low and similar to that after a negative or low-probability V-P scan. Helical CT is a reliable imaging tool for excluding clinically important PE.

AB - PURPOSE: To determine whether a helical computed tomographic (CT) scan that is negative for pulmonary embolism (PE) is a sufficiently reliable criterion to safely withhold anticoagulation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with negative helical CT scans were prospectively compared with patients with negative or low-probability scintigrams. In a 460-bed university hospital and clinic, 1,015 adult patients underwent either scintigraphy or helical CT for possible PE for 25 months. Five hundred forty- eight patients who had negative images and were not receiving anticoagulation therapy were prospectively followed up for 3 months for clinical, new imaging, death certificate, or autopsy evidence of subsequent PE. Ninety- seven patients were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: Subsequent PE was found in two (1.0%) of 198 patients with negative CT scans, none of 188 patients with negative ventilation-perfusion (V-P) scans, and five (3.1%) of 162 patients with low-probability V-P scans (not statistically significant). Patient in the helical CT group were hospitalized more often, had more severe disease, had more substantial PE risk factors, and had a higher death rate. No deaths were attributed to PE in either group. CONCLUSION: The frequency of clinical diagnoses of PE after a negative CT scan was low and similar to that after a negative or low-probability V-P scan. Helical CT is a reliable imaging tool for excluding clinically important PE.

KW - Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies

KW - Computed tomography (CT), helical

KW - Embolism, pulmonary

KW - Lung, perfusion

KW - Lung, ventilation

KW - Pulmonary arteries, CT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033999934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033999934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10796937

AN - SCOPUS:0033999934

VL - 215

SP - 535

EP - 542

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 2

ER -