Structural stiffness and reducibility of external fixators placed in malalignment and malrotation

David B. Carmack, Kenneth L. Kaylor, Michael J Yaszemski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the structural stiffness and reducibility of various external fixators placed in malalignment and malrotation. Design: Uniform testing of all external fixator configurations. Setting: Orthopaedic biomechanical laboratory. Methods: Thirteen external fixators from different manufacturers, in a total of fifteen configurations, were studied. All external fixators were applied to a malreduction jig initially, and a subsequent anatomic reduction was then attempted. If an anatomic reduction was possible, the structural stiffness of those fixators was determined. If anatomic reduction was not possible, the external fixator was removed and reapplied to an anatomically reduced model, and then structural stiffness was determined. Results: Six of the thirteen external fixator configurations, allowed an anatomic reduction after placement on a malreduction model. The other nine external fixator configurations would not allow for an anatomic reduction. All the external fixator configurations were biomechanically tested in anteroposterior bending, lateral bending, axial load, and torsion. Each fixator had its own structural stiffness and is reported. Conclusions: Some external fixators will not allow for an anatomic reduction once placed in malalignment and malrotation without repositioning of the fixator pins. External fixator configurations (i.e., single-pin, dual-pin, and multipin barclamps) affect structural stiffness. Structural stiffness widely varied among the external fixators. Proper external fixator selection will enable early fracture immobilization in malalignment and malrotation in suboptimal conditions (e.g., wartime conditions or a civilian disaster), with subsequent external fixator adjustment for an anatomic reduction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-253
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

External Fixators
Structural Models
Disasters
Immobilization
Orthopedics

Keywords

  • External fixator
  • Tibia fracture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Structural stiffness and reducibility of external fixators placed in malalignment and malrotation. / Carmack, David B.; Kaylor, Kenneth L.; Yaszemski, Michael J.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2001, p. 247-253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bcdb345b10984ba0b9d09ef35fb3667c,
title = "Structural stiffness and reducibility of external fixators placed in malalignment and malrotation",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the structural stiffness and reducibility of various external fixators placed in malalignment and malrotation. Design: Uniform testing of all external fixator configurations. Setting: Orthopaedic biomechanical laboratory. Methods: Thirteen external fixators from different manufacturers, in a total of fifteen configurations, were studied. All external fixators were applied to a malreduction jig initially, and a subsequent anatomic reduction was then attempted. If an anatomic reduction was possible, the structural stiffness of those fixators was determined. If anatomic reduction was not possible, the external fixator was removed and reapplied to an anatomically reduced model, and then structural stiffness was determined. Results: Six of the thirteen external fixator configurations, allowed an anatomic reduction after placement on a malreduction model. The other nine external fixator configurations would not allow for an anatomic reduction. All the external fixator configurations were biomechanically tested in anteroposterior bending, lateral bending, axial load, and torsion. Each fixator had its own structural stiffness and is reported. Conclusions: Some external fixators will not allow for an anatomic reduction once placed in malalignment and malrotation without repositioning of the fixator pins. External fixator configurations (i.e., single-pin, dual-pin, and multipin barclamps) affect structural stiffness. Structural stiffness widely varied among the external fixators. Proper external fixator selection will enable early fracture immobilization in malalignment and malrotation in suboptimal conditions (e.g., wartime conditions or a civilian disaster), with subsequent external fixator adjustment for an anatomic reduction.",
keywords = "External fixator, Tibia fracture",
author = "Carmack, {David B.} and Kaylor, {Kenneth L.} and Yaszemski, {Michael J}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1097/00005131-200105000-00003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "247--253",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma",
issn = "0890-5339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structural stiffness and reducibility of external fixators placed in malalignment and malrotation

AU - Carmack, David B.

AU - Kaylor, Kenneth L.

AU - Yaszemski, Michael J

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objective: To determine the structural stiffness and reducibility of various external fixators placed in malalignment and malrotation. Design: Uniform testing of all external fixator configurations. Setting: Orthopaedic biomechanical laboratory. Methods: Thirteen external fixators from different manufacturers, in a total of fifteen configurations, were studied. All external fixators were applied to a malreduction jig initially, and a subsequent anatomic reduction was then attempted. If an anatomic reduction was possible, the structural stiffness of those fixators was determined. If anatomic reduction was not possible, the external fixator was removed and reapplied to an anatomically reduced model, and then structural stiffness was determined. Results: Six of the thirteen external fixator configurations, allowed an anatomic reduction after placement on a malreduction model. The other nine external fixator configurations would not allow for an anatomic reduction. All the external fixator configurations were biomechanically tested in anteroposterior bending, lateral bending, axial load, and torsion. Each fixator had its own structural stiffness and is reported. Conclusions: Some external fixators will not allow for an anatomic reduction once placed in malalignment and malrotation without repositioning of the fixator pins. External fixator configurations (i.e., single-pin, dual-pin, and multipin barclamps) affect structural stiffness. Structural stiffness widely varied among the external fixators. Proper external fixator selection will enable early fracture immobilization in malalignment and malrotation in suboptimal conditions (e.g., wartime conditions or a civilian disaster), with subsequent external fixator adjustment for an anatomic reduction.

AB - Objective: To determine the structural stiffness and reducibility of various external fixators placed in malalignment and malrotation. Design: Uniform testing of all external fixator configurations. Setting: Orthopaedic biomechanical laboratory. Methods: Thirteen external fixators from different manufacturers, in a total of fifteen configurations, were studied. All external fixators were applied to a malreduction jig initially, and a subsequent anatomic reduction was then attempted. If an anatomic reduction was possible, the structural stiffness of those fixators was determined. If anatomic reduction was not possible, the external fixator was removed and reapplied to an anatomically reduced model, and then structural stiffness was determined. Results: Six of the thirteen external fixator configurations, allowed an anatomic reduction after placement on a malreduction model. The other nine external fixator configurations would not allow for an anatomic reduction. All the external fixator configurations were biomechanically tested in anteroposterior bending, lateral bending, axial load, and torsion. Each fixator had its own structural stiffness and is reported. Conclusions: Some external fixators will not allow for an anatomic reduction once placed in malalignment and malrotation without repositioning of the fixator pins. External fixator configurations (i.e., single-pin, dual-pin, and multipin barclamps) affect structural stiffness. Structural stiffness widely varied among the external fixators. Proper external fixator selection will enable early fracture immobilization in malalignment and malrotation in suboptimal conditions (e.g., wartime conditions or a civilian disaster), with subsequent external fixator adjustment for an anatomic reduction.

KW - External fixator

KW - Tibia fracture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034952157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034952157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005131-200105000-00003

DO - 10.1097/00005131-200105000-00003

M3 - Article

C2 - 11371789

AN - SCOPUS:0034952157

VL - 15

SP - 247

EP - 253

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

SN - 0890-5339

IS - 4

ER -