Stroke with dysarthria

Evaluate and treat; garden variety or down the garden path?

Joseph R. Duffy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The case of a man who initially presented to an emergency room with an isolated dysarthria is reviewed in order to demonstrate how the history, clinical context, and clinical observations can lead to accurate or inaccurate diagnosis. The diagnostic process in this case illustrates (1) the value of experience in clinical practice; (2) the role of the history and clinical context in diagnosis, but their occasional capacity to mislead; (3) the importance of distinguishing evidence from inference; (4) the use of deductive strategies and pattern recognition in speech diagnosis; (5) the importance of diagnostic vigilance; (6) the value of distinguishing among dysarthria types; and (7) the contribution that the diagnosis of speech disorders can make to the localization and diagnosis of neurologic disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)93-98
Number of pages6
JournalSeminars in Speech and Language
Volume19
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Dysarthria
Stroke
History
Speech Disorders
Nervous System Diseases
Hospital Emergency Service

Keywords

  • Diagnosis
  • Dysarthria
  • Motor speech disorder
  • Myasthenia gravis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Stroke with dysarthria : Evaluate and treat; garden variety or down the garden path? / Duffy, Joseph R.

In: Seminars in Speech and Language, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1998, p. 93-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c173e3939e0d426a814b1a43ec64c03d,
title = "Stroke with dysarthria: Evaluate and treat; garden variety or down the garden path?",
abstract = "The case of a man who initially presented to an emergency room with an isolated dysarthria is reviewed in order to demonstrate how the history, clinical context, and clinical observations can lead to accurate or inaccurate diagnosis. The diagnostic process in this case illustrates (1) the value of experience in clinical practice; (2) the role of the history and clinical context in diagnosis, but their occasional capacity to mislead; (3) the importance of distinguishing evidence from inference; (4) the use of deductive strategies and pattern recognition in speech diagnosis; (5) the importance of diagnostic vigilance; (6) the value of distinguishing among dysarthria types; and (7) the contribution that the diagnosis of speech disorders can make to the localization and diagnosis of neurologic disease.",
keywords = "Diagnosis, Dysarthria, Motor speech disorder, Myasthenia gravis",
author = "Duffy, {Joseph R.}",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "93--98",
journal = "Seminars in Speech and Language",
issn = "0734-0478",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stroke with dysarthria

T2 - Evaluate and treat; garden variety or down the garden path?

AU - Duffy, Joseph R.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - The case of a man who initially presented to an emergency room with an isolated dysarthria is reviewed in order to demonstrate how the history, clinical context, and clinical observations can lead to accurate or inaccurate diagnosis. The diagnostic process in this case illustrates (1) the value of experience in clinical practice; (2) the role of the history and clinical context in diagnosis, but their occasional capacity to mislead; (3) the importance of distinguishing evidence from inference; (4) the use of deductive strategies and pattern recognition in speech diagnosis; (5) the importance of diagnostic vigilance; (6) the value of distinguishing among dysarthria types; and (7) the contribution that the diagnosis of speech disorders can make to the localization and diagnosis of neurologic disease.

AB - The case of a man who initially presented to an emergency room with an isolated dysarthria is reviewed in order to demonstrate how the history, clinical context, and clinical observations can lead to accurate or inaccurate diagnosis. The diagnostic process in this case illustrates (1) the value of experience in clinical practice; (2) the role of the history and clinical context in diagnosis, but their occasional capacity to mislead; (3) the importance of distinguishing evidence from inference; (4) the use of deductive strategies and pattern recognition in speech diagnosis; (5) the importance of diagnostic vigilance; (6) the value of distinguishing among dysarthria types; and (7) the contribution that the diagnosis of speech disorders can make to the localization and diagnosis of neurologic disease.

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Dysarthria

KW - Motor speech disorder

KW - Myasthenia gravis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0348137762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0348137762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 93

EP - 98

JO - Seminars in Speech and Language

JF - Seminars in Speech and Language

SN - 0734-0478

IS - 1

ER -