Stimulation ranges, usage ranges, and paresthesia mapping during occipital nerve stimulation

Terrence L. Trentman, Richard S. Zimmerman, Nikesh Seth, Joseph G. Hentz, David William Dodick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction. Subcutaneous, occipital nerve stimulation has emerged as a potentially effective treatment modality for patients with refractory headache disorders. The purpose of this study was to document occipital stimulation characteristics in 10 patients status post implantation of an occipital nerve stimulator. Methods. All possible electrode combinations were tested in each patient, and sensory threshold, discomfort threshold, and associated paresthesia maps were noted. Results. Mean perception threshold was 1.07 V and mean discomfort threshold was 3.63 V. The associated paresthesia maps demonstrated that most patients felt stimulation as expected in the occipital regions; trigeminal distribution stimulation occurred but only in a minority of patients. Half of the patients experienced ≥ 50% reduction in headache frequency or severity. Conclusions. These results should aid in clinical decision-making and manufacturing requirements for this modality; larger, prospective studies will be needed to determine the safety and efficacy of stimulation techniques for headache disorders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)56-61
Number of pages6
JournalNeuromodulation
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008

Fingerprint

Paresthesia
Headache Disorders
Sensory Thresholds
Occipital Lobe
Headache
Electrodes
Prospective Studies
Safety

Keywords

  • Headache disorder
  • Migraine headache
  • Occipital nerve stimulation
  • Paresthesia
  • Peripheral nerve stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Stimulation ranges, usage ranges, and paresthesia mapping during occipital nerve stimulation. / Trentman, Terrence L.; Zimmerman, Richard S.; Seth, Nikesh; Hentz, Joseph G.; Dodick, David William.

In: Neuromodulation, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 56-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trentman, Terrence L. ; Zimmerman, Richard S. ; Seth, Nikesh ; Hentz, Joseph G. ; Dodick, David William. / Stimulation ranges, usage ranges, and paresthesia mapping during occipital nerve stimulation. In: Neuromodulation. 2008 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 56-61.
@article{68fce821bdf548299e034dda701bcbb9,
title = "Stimulation ranges, usage ranges, and paresthesia mapping during occipital nerve stimulation",
abstract = "Introduction. Subcutaneous, occipital nerve stimulation has emerged as a potentially effective treatment modality for patients with refractory headache disorders. The purpose of this study was to document occipital stimulation characteristics in 10 patients status post implantation of an occipital nerve stimulator. Methods. All possible electrode combinations were tested in each patient, and sensory threshold, discomfort threshold, and associated paresthesia maps were noted. Results. Mean perception threshold was 1.07 V and mean discomfort threshold was 3.63 V. The associated paresthesia maps demonstrated that most patients felt stimulation as expected in the occipital regions; trigeminal distribution stimulation occurred but only in a minority of patients. Half of the patients experienced ≥ 50{\%} reduction in headache frequency or severity. Conclusions. These results should aid in clinical decision-making and manufacturing requirements for this modality; larger, prospective studies will be needed to determine the safety and efficacy of stimulation techniques for headache disorders.",
keywords = "Headache disorder, Migraine headache, Occipital nerve stimulation, Paresthesia, Peripheral nerve stimulation",
author = "Trentman, {Terrence L.} and Zimmerman, {Richard S.} and Nikesh Seth and Hentz, {Joseph G.} and Dodick, {David William}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1525-1403.2007.00143.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "56--61",
journal = "Neuromodulation",
issn = "1094-7159",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stimulation ranges, usage ranges, and paresthesia mapping during occipital nerve stimulation

AU - Trentman, Terrence L.

AU - Zimmerman, Richard S.

AU - Seth, Nikesh

AU - Hentz, Joseph G.

AU - Dodick, David William

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - Introduction. Subcutaneous, occipital nerve stimulation has emerged as a potentially effective treatment modality for patients with refractory headache disorders. The purpose of this study was to document occipital stimulation characteristics in 10 patients status post implantation of an occipital nerve stimulator. Methods. All possible electrode combinations were tested in each patient, and sensory threshold, discomfort threshold, and associated paresthesia maps were noted. Results. Mean perception threshold was 1.07 V and mean discomfort threshold was 3.63 V. The associated paresthesia maps demonstrated that most patients felt stimulation as expected in the occipital regions; trigeminal distribution stimulation occurred but only in a minority of patients. Half of the patients experienced ≥ 50% reduction in headache frequency or severity. Conclusions. These results should aid in clinical decision-making and manufacturing requirements for this modality; larger, prospective studies will be needed to determine the safety and efficacy of stimulation techniques for headache disorders.

AB - Introduction. Subcutaneous, occipital nerve stimulation has emerged as a potentially effective treatment modality for patients with refractory headache disorders. The purpose of this study was to document occipital stimulation characteristics in 10 patients status post implantation of an occipital nerve stimulator. Methods. All possible electrode combinations were tested in each patient, and sensory threshold, discomfort threshold, and associated paresthesia maps were noted. Results. Mean perception threshold was 1.07 V and mean discomfort threshold was 3.63 V. The associated paresthesia maps demonstrated that most patients felt stimulation as expected in the occipital regions; trigeminal distribution stimulation occurred but only in a minority of patients. Half of the patients experienced ≥ 50% reduction in headache frequency or severity. Conclusions. These results should aid in clinical decision-making and manufacturing requirements for this modality; larger, prospective studies will be needed to determine the safety and efficacy of stimulation techniques for headache disorders.

KW - Headache disorder

KW - Migraine headache

KW - Occipital nerve stimulation

KW - Paresthesia

KW - Peripheral nerve stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37549015226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37549015226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2007.00143.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2007.00143.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 22150992

AN - SCOPUS:37549015226

VL - 11

SP - 56

EP - 61

JO - Neuromodulation

JF - Neuromodulation

SN - 1094-7159

IS - 1

ER -