Stepwise surgical correction of instability in flexion after total knee replacement

Matthew Abdel, L. Pulido, E. P. Severson, A. D. Hanssen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Instability in flexion after total knee replacement (TKR) typically occurs as a result of mismatched flexion and extension gaps. The goals of this study were to identify factors leading to instability in flexion, the degree of correction, determined radiologically, required at revision surgery, and the subsequent clinical outcomes. Between 2000 and 2010, 60 TKRs in 60 patients underwent revision for instability in flexion associated with well-fixed components. There were 33 women (55%) and 27 men (45%); their mean age was 65 years (43 to 82). Radiological measurements and the Knee Society score (KSS) were used to assess outcome after revision surgery. The mean follow-up was 3.6 years (2 to 9.8). Decreased condylar offset (p < 0.001), distalisation of the joint line (p < 0.001) and increased posterior tibial slope (p < 0.001) contributed to instability in flexion and required correction at revision to regain stability. The combined mean correction of posterior condylar offset and joint line resection was 9.5 mm, and a mean of 5° of posterior tibial slope was removed. At the most recent follow-up, there was a significant improvement in the mean KSS for the knee and function (both p < 0.001), no patient reported instability and no patient underwent further surgery for instability. The following step-wise approach is recommended: reduction of tibial slope, correction of malalignment, and improvement of condylar offset. Additional joint line elevation is needed if the above steps do not equalise the flexion and extension gaps.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1644-1648
Number of pages5
JournalBone and Joint Journal
Volume96B
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Joints
Reoperation
Knee

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Stepwise surgical correction of instability in flexion after total knee replacement. / Abdel, Matthew; Pulido, L.; Severson, E. P.; Hanssen, A. D.

In: Bone and Joint Journal, Vol. 96B, No. 12, 01.12.2014, p. 1644-1648.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abdel, Matthew ; Pulido, L. ; Severson, E. P. ; Hanssen, A. D. / Stepwise surgical correction of instability in flexion after total knee replacement. In: Bone and Joint Journal. 2014 ; Vol. 96B, No. 12. pp. 1644-1648.
@article{4a457b9c50084133a045a2e981c1ea58,
title = "Stepwise surgical correction of instability in flexion after total knee replacement",
abstract = "Instability in flexion after total knee replacement (TKR) typically occurs as a result of mismatched flexion and extension gaps. The goals of this study were to identify factors leading to instability in flexion, the degree of correction, determined radiologically, required at revision surgery, and the subsequent clinical outcomes. Between 2000 and 2010, 60 TKRs in 60 patients underwent revision for instability in flexion associated with well-fixed components. There were 33 women (55{\%}) and 27 men (45{\%}); their mean age was 65 years (43 to 82). Radiological measurements and the Knee Society score (KSS) were used to assess outcome after revision surgery. The mean follow-up was 3.6 years (2 to 9.8). Decreased condylar offset (p < 0.001), distalisation of the joint line (p < 0.001) and increased posterior tibial slope (p < 0.001) contributed to instability in flexion and required correction at revision to regain stability. The combined mean correction of posterior condylar offset and joint line resection was 9.5 mm, and a mean of 5° of posterior tibial slope was removed. At the most recent follow-up, there was a significant improvement in the mean KSS for the knee and function (both p < 0.001), no patient reported instability and no patient underwent further surgery for instability. The following step-wise approach is recommended: reduction of tibial slope, correction of malalignment, and improvement of condylar offset. Additional joint line elevation is needed if the above steps do not equalise the flexion and extension gaps.",
author = "Matthew Abdel and L. Pulido and Severson, {E. P.} and Hanssen, {A. D.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1302/0301-620X.96B12.34821",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96B",
pages = "1644--1648",
journal = "Bone and Joint Journal",
issn = "2049-4394",
publisher = "British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stepwise surgical correction of instability in flexion after total knee replacement

AU - Abdel, Matthew

AU - Pulido, L.

AU - Severson, E. P.

AU - Hanssen, A. D.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Instability in flexion after total knee replacement (TKR) typically occurs as a result of mismatched flexion and extension gaps. The goals of this study were to identify factors leading to instability in flexion, the degree of correction, determined radiologically, required at revision surgery, and the subsequent clinical outcomes. Between 2000 and 2010, 60 TKRs in 60 patients underwent revision for instability in flexion associated with well-fixed components. There were 33 women (55%) and 27 men (45%); their mean age was 65 years (43 to 82). Radiological measurements and the Knee Society score (KSS) were used to assess outcome after revision surgery. The mean follow-up was 3.6 years (2 to 9.8). Decreased condylar offset (p < 0.001), distalisation of the joint line (p < 0.001) and increased posterior tibial slope (p < 0.001) contributed to instability in flexion and required correction at revision to regain stability. The combined mean correction of posterior condylar offset and joint line resection was 9.5 mm, and a mean of 5° of posterior tibial slope was removed. At the most recent follow-up, there was a significant improvement in the mean KSS for the knee and function (both p < 0.001), no patient reported instability and no patient underwent further surgery for instability. The following step-wise approach is recommended: reduction of tibial slope, correction of malalignment, and improvement of condylar offset. Additional joint line elevation is needed if the above steps do not equalise the flexion and extension gaps.

AB - Instability in flexion after total knee replacement (TKR) typically occurs as a result of mismatched flexion and extension gaps. The goals of this study were to identify factors leading to instability in flexion, the degree of correction, determined radiologically, required at revision surgery, and the subsequent clinical outcomes. Between 2000 and 2010, 60 TKRs in 60 patients underwent revision for instability in flexion associated with well-fixed components. There were 33 women (55%) and 27 men (45%); their mean age was 65 years (43 to 82). Radiological measurements and the Knee Society score (KSS) were used to assess outcome after revision surgery. The mean follow-up was 3.6 years (2 to 9.8). Decreased condylar offset (p < 0.001), distalisation of the joint line (p < 0.001) and increased posterior tibial slope (p < 0.001) contributed to instability in flexion and required correction at revision to regain stability. The combined mean correction of posterior condylar offset and joint line resection was 9.5 mm, and a mean of 5° of posterior tibial slope was removed. At the most recent follow-up, there was a significant improvement in the mean KSS for the knee and function (both p < 0.001), no patient reported instability and no patient underwent further surgery for instability. The following step-wise approach is recommended: reduction of tibial slope, correction of malalignment, and improvement of condylar offset. Additional joint line elevation is needed if the above steps do not equalise the flexion and extension gaps.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919342669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919342669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1302/0301-620X.96B12.34821

DO - 10.1302/0301-620X.96B12.34821

M3 - Article

C2 - 25452367

AN - SCOPUS:84919342669

VL - 96B

SP - 1644

EP - 1648

JO - Bone and Joint Journal

JF - Bone and Joint Journal

SN - 2049-4394

IS - 12

ER -