Step detection using multi- versus single tri-axial accelerometer-based systems

E. Fortune, Va Lugade, Shreyasee Amin, Kenton R Kaufman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multiple sensors are often considered necessary for increased step count accuracy. However, subject adherence to device-wear increases using a minimal number of activity monitors (AMs). The study aims were to determine and compare the validity of using multiple AMs versus a single AM to detect steps by comparison to video using a modification of an algorithm previously developed for a four-accelerometer AM system capable, unlike other algorithms, of accurate step detection for gait velocities as low as 0.1 m s-1. Twelve healthy adults wore ankle, thigh and waist AMs while performing walking/jogging trials at gait velocities from 0.1-4.8 m s-1 and a simulated free-living dynamic activities protocol. Nineteen older adults wore ankle and waist AMs while walking at velocities from 0.5-2.0 m s-1. As little as one AM (thigh or waist) accurately detected steps for velocities >0.5 m s-1. A single ankle AM accurately detected steps for velocities 0.1 m s-1. Only the thigh AM could not accurately detect steps during the dynamic activities. Only the thigh-ankle combination or single waist AM could accurately distinguish between walking and jogging steps. These laboratory-based results suggest that the presented algorithm can accurately detect steps in a free-living environment using only one ankle or waist AM.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2519-2535
Number of pages17
JournalPhysiological Measurement
Volume36
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 23 2015

Fingerprint

Accelerometers
Ankle
Thigh
Jogging
Walking
Wear of materials
Gait
Equipment and Supplies
Sensors

Keywords

  • accelerometer
  • body-worn sensors
  • movement analysis
  • sensor location
  • step detection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Step detection using multi- versus single tri-axial accelerometer-based systems. / Fortune, E.; Lugade, Va; Amin, Shreyasee; Kaufman, Kenton R.

In: Physiological Measurement, Vol. 36, No. 12, 23.11.2015, p. 2519-2535.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f1e60a9a61084667b43713486703d072,
title = "Step detection using multi- versus single tri-axial accelerometer-based systems",
abstract = "Multiple sensors are often considered necessary for increased step count accuracy. However, subject adherence to device-wear increases using a minimal number of activity monitors (AMs). The study aims were to determine and compare the validity of using multiple AMs versus a single AM to detect steps by comparison to video using a modification of an algorithm previously developed for a four-accelerometer AM system capable, unlike other algorithms, of accurate step detection for gait velocities as low as 0.1 m s-1. Twelve healthy adults wore ankle, thigh and waist AMs while performing walking/jogging trials at gait velocities from 0.1-4.8 m s-1 and a simulated free-living dynamic activities protocol. Nineteen older adults wore ankle and waist AMs while walking at velocities from 0.5-2.0 m s-1. As little as one AM (thigh or waist) accurately detected steps for velocities >0.5 m s-1. A single ankle AM accurately detected steps for velocities 0.1 m s-1. Only the thigh AM could not accurately detect steps during the dynamic activities. Only the thigh-ankle combination or single waist AM could accurately distinguish between walking and jogging steps. These laboratory-based results suggest that the presented algorithm can accurately detect steps in a free-living environment using only one ankle or waist AM.",
keywords = "accelerometer, body-worn sensors, movement analysis, sensor location, step detection",
author = "E. Fortune and Va Lugade and Shreyasee Amin and Kaufman, {Kenton R}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1088/0967-3334/36/12/2519",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "2519--2535",
journal = "Physiological Measurement",
issn = "0967-3334",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Step detection using multi- versus single tri-axial accelerometer-based systems

AU - Fortune, E.

AU - Lugade, Va

AU - Amin, Shreyasee

AU - Kaufman, Kenton R

PY - 2015/11/23

Y1 - 2015/11/23

N2 - Multiple sensors are often considered necessary for increased step count accuracy. However, subject adherence to device-wear increases using a minimal number of activity monitors (AMs). The study aims were to determine and compare the validity of using multiple AMs versus a single AM to detect steps by comparison to video using a modification of an algorithm previously developed for a four-accelerometer AM system capable, unlike other algorithms, of accurate step detection for gait velocities as low as 0.1 m s-1. Twelve healthy adults wore ankle, thigh and waist AMs while performing walking/jogging trials at gait velocities from 0.1-4.8 m s-1 and a simulated free-living dynamic activities protocol. Nineteen older adults wore ankle and waist AMs while walking at velocities from 0.5-2.0 m s-1. As little as one AM (thigh or waist) accurately detected steps for velocities >0.5 m s-1. A single ankle AM accurately detected steps for velocities 0.1 m s-1. Only the thigh AM could not accurately detect steps during the dynamic activities. Only the thigh-ankle combination or single waist AM could accurately distinguish between walking and jogging steps. These laboratory-based results suggest that the presented algorithm can accurately detect steps in a free-living environment using only one ankle or waist AM.

AB - Multiple sensors are often considered necessary for increased step count accuracy. However, subject adherence to device-wear increases using a minimal number of activity monitors (AMs). The study aims were to determine and compare the validity of using multiple AMs versus a single AM to detect steps by comparison to video using a modification of an algorithm previously developed for a four-accelerometer AM system capable, unlike other algorithms, of accurate step detection for gait velocities as low as 0.1 m s-1. Twelve healthy adults wore ankle, thigh and waist AMs while performing walking/jogging trials at gait velocities from 0.1-4.8 m s-1 and a simulated free-living dynamic activities protocol. Nineteen older adults wore ankle and waist AMs while walking at velocities from 0.5-2.0 m s-1. As little as one AM (thigh or waist) accurately detected steps for velocities >0.5 m s-1. A single ankle AM accurately detected steps for velocities 0.1 m s-1. Only the thigh AM could not accurately detect steps during the dynamic activities. Only the thigh-ankle combination or single waist AM could accurately distinguish between walking and jogging steps. These laboratory-based results suggest that the presented algorithm can accurately detect steps in a free-living environment using only one ankle or waist AM.

KW - accelerometer

KW - body-worn sensors

KW - movement analysis

KW - sensor location

KW - step detection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957874547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957874547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/0967-3334/36/12/2519

DO - 10.1088/0967-3334/36/12/2519

M3 - Article

C2 - 26595421

AN - SCOPUS:84957874547

VL - 36

SP - 2519

EP - 2535

JO - Physiological Measurement

JF - Physiological Measurement

SN - 0967-3334

IS - 12

ER -